Would you v**e for a political party that had this platform?
Jul 12, 2020 12:09:51 #
JFlorio
Loc: Seminole Florida
son of witless wrote:
Was there more to your post ? Maybe I must fill in the blanks to your cryptic post ? Ask my Wife, I am not good at mind reading. 
If you could mind read I’m sure FNF’s mind would be more like a short story, no novel there.
Jul 12, 2020 12:14:50 #
JFlorio wrote:
If you could mind read I’m sure FNF’s mind would be more like a short story, no novel there.
I think it is written in Arabic or Ebonoics.
Jul 12, 2020 12:39:58 #
Liberty Tree wrote:
Not to mention the platform would be all lies if proposed by Democrats.
AGREED. It's why I won't v**e Democrat. Every one of them lied about policies they "intended" to pass over the last 50 years, that I know of.Jul 12, 2020 12:41:03 #
steve66613 wrote:
Good point! However, the Rats would eliminate the E*******l College for sure. Term limits? Most Rats are lifelong politicians and the more recent ones plan to be. Some of them have been politicians FOR GENERATIONS!
Yep. I would NEVER see Democrats instituting term limits. They all get far too rich in office
Jul 12, 2020 12:42:34 #
JFlorio
Loc: Seminole Florida
debeda wrote:
Yep. I would NEVER see Democrats instituting term limits. They all get far too rich in office
I agree, but I believe most Republicans just give term limits lip service.
Jul 12, 2020 12:42:51 #
JFlorio wrote:
Even fact not fiction can’t believe any Democrats would support More than 5% of those points.
Yep. Only the abolishing of the e*******l college, IMO. The rest would never serve them. Well, maybe using trying to balance the budget by extremely raising taxes
Jul 12, 2020 12:44:09 #
Auntie Dee wrote:
A few of these SOUND good & will probably be touted, but anyone with ANY sense knows they would NEVER happen!! The only one they will push REALLY HARD is the POPULAR V**E to do away with the E*******l College! Because that completely changes the power structure in the USA and we will only have ONE political party...C*******T DEMOCRATS!!
Jul 12, 2020 13:13:46 #
Liberty Tree wrote:
Not to mention the platform would be all lies if proposed by Democrats.
That’s the t***h in the picture.
Jul 12, 2020 13:14:31 #
debeda wrote:
Yep. I would NEVER see Democrats instituting term limits. They all get far too rich in office
Jul 12, 2020 13:14:53 #
JFlorio wrote:
I agree, but I believe most Republicans just give term limits lip service.
Don’t they all?
Jul 12, 2020 13:15:33 #
JFlorio wrote:
If you could mind read I’m sure FNF’s mind would be more like a short story, no novel there.
Jul 12, 2020 13:45:15 #
factnotfiction wrote:
.Maintaining a balanced budget, ensured by passing ... (show quote)
It's just rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic if the platform doesn't include an end to the a*********n of a******n. I venture to say that God cares very little about most of this platform but woe to the unrepentant come Judgement Day when our Father demands an explanation for allowing, even encouraging, the butchering of the little brothers and sisters.
Jul 12, 2020 13:51:52 #
Roamin' Catholic wrote:
.
It's just rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic if the platform doesn't include an end to the a*********n of a******n. I venture to say that God cares very little about most of this platform but woe to the unrepentant come Judgement Day when our Father demands an explanation for allowing, even encouraging, the butchering of the little brothers and sisters.
It's just rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic if the platform doesn't include an end to the a*********n of a******n. I venture to say that God cares very little about most of this platform but woe to the unrepentant come Judgement Day when our Father demands an explanation for allowing, even encouraging, the butchering of the little brothers and sisters.
Jul 12, 2020 14:25:30 #
How about this for e*******l college reform - Rather than have all the e*****rs having to v**e for the candidate who got the most v**es in their state, the e*****rs representing the two state senators would have to v**e for the candidate who got the most v**es in the state and the e*****rs representing the House members would have to v**e for the candidate who got the most v**es in their district. This gives more weight to conservative v**ers in states like California, New York, and Washington state where I live. and this would be fair because supposedly Representatives all represent an equal number of citizens. This parallels the makeup of the U.S. Congress where the Senators represent the states (at least they did until the 17th Amendment was ratified) and the Representatives represent the people.
Jul 12, 2020 15:01:51 #
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.