One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Blocking Sections Of Mueller Report
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
Jul 3, 2020 23:25:31   #
Seth
 
Milosia2 wrote:
Welcome to your new world where everything everything is to the left of you and your trumpet party.
This proves how far you’ve gone to the right. Now you’ve lost all hope of centrist anything. Centrist for you is still way far right.


Nope. The propagandists on the left are employing the old Marxist strategy of leading people to believe that "everybody agrees with us."

You'll learn in November just how much you've been misled. Naturally, you won't accept the e******n results -- you'll yell that the polls were r****d, you'll accuse the e*****rate of being stupid, you'll claim that "the Russians did it" -- anything rather than admit the t***h; that the American people just aren't buying what today's Democratic Party has to sell.

Some people are simply beyond help.

Reply
Jul 4, 2020 02:18:19   #
Kickaha Loc: Nebraska
 
Milosia2 wrote:
Trump just filed papers to block sections of the Mueller Report that
Would
EXONERATE
him!!!!


The only sections blocked in the Mueller report concerned grand jury testimony, which is kept secret by law. This is nothing new because of Trump, it has been a legal requirement throughout American legal history.

Reply
Jul 7, 2020 21:56:24   #
Milosia2 Loc: Cleveland Ohio
 
Seth wrote:
Wrong.

The entire reason for the Mueller "investigation" was not the stated "to determine if there was Russian interference in the e******n," it was, pure and simple, to "find a way, any way, to prove that Trump colluded with the Russians to influence the e******n in his favor."

To that end, Mueller's "investigative" group was staffed entirely with severe anti-Trump and fervent Hillary supporters, not a neutral soul among them, and his chief "investigator" was an anti-Trump shark/attorney with a reputation for framing anyone he set out to convict.

Anyone who even infers that there was anything impartial about Mueller and Co. is full of feces, and anyone who thinks that anything about that make-up of "investigative" staff is even remotely in keeping with any kind of fairness or the spirit of American jurisprudence is either really stupid or simply so h**eful of this president that they are willing to disregard any fragment of honesty or decency -- in other words, scum.

That said, Mueller was being paid to find Russian Collusion, not to find the t***h. Since he and his kangaroo court style "inquiry" were unable to come up with even a shred of evidence to support the lie they were paid to bring to fruition, the only thing Mueller could do was claim that he couldn't "exonerate" the president instead of being t***hful and saying there was no "there" there.

When he testified before Congress, the man couldn't even "remember" or cite a single significant element of his so-called "investigation."

The Democrats subjected the American people to two years of that bulls**t at a cost of nearly $40 million to the hard working taxpayer, with Adam Schitt and innumerable mainstream media shills parroting the "we have irrefutable proof" narrative, only to find that we had been blatantly lied to.

Do you honestly believe that We, the People are that stupid or senile that we will have already forgotten that two year farce or can be fooled by any obfuscations the Democrats try to cover it over with?

Boy, are you in for a shock on 3 November!
Wrong. br br The entire reason for the Mueller &q... (show quote)


No one was looking for collusion. Collusion is not a crime nor is it punishable.
Mueller found 10 instances of “ Impeachable” Offenses.
Yes. 10.

Reply
 
 
Jul 7, 2020 22:20:00   #
Seth
 
Milosia2 wrote:
No one was looking for collusion. Collusion is not a crime nor is it punishable.
Mueller found 10 instances of “ Impeachable” Offenses.
Yes. 10.


Mueller's brief was to find something to pin on Trump, period. There was nothing impartial about it, and his staff were all known Trump h**ers and major Hillary supporters. The lead "investigator" was a prosector known to be sk**led at finding crimes where there were none.

Had Mueller found a there there, he would have flatly stated it in his conclusions as he was hired to do.

Nothing there, just a lot of nothing for $40 million in taxpayer dollars.

You can let your TDS and its resulting bitterness tell you there were some non-existent impeachable offenses, but evidently even Pelosi and Schitt didn't see any, so they were compelled to impeach him over a different farce later.

Look how well that worked out for them.

Reply
Jul 8, 2020 04:33:05   #
Kickaha Loc: Nebraska
 
Milosia2 wrote:
No one was looking for collusion. Collusion is not a crime nor is it punishable.
Mueller found 10 instances of “ Impeachable” Offenses.
Yes. 10.


If there were 'impeachable' offences in the report, why were they not in the impeachment hearing records or used in the impeachment trial? Could it be that the Democrats wanted to hold on to some charges in case Trump is reelected so they could try impeachment another time or two?

Reply
Jul 8, 2020 04:42:40   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
Milosia2 wrote:
The evidence was suppressed that would’ve
Proved him guilty.
Testimony was suppressed. Obstructed by trump himself.
Whose testimony was suppressed? Do you know who really conducted the Mueller investigation? Who led the charge? Wasn't Robert Mueller.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.