Can your kids tell you any of the 10 comments? I bet not.
Jul 3, 2020 13:45:40 #
Michael Rich
Loc: Lapine Oregon
moldyoldy wrote:
Like ignoring the fact that Putin put a bounty on our soldiers.
The Pentagon said the story was unverified.
Jul 3, 2020 14:08:33 #
byronglimish wrote:
The Pentagon said the story was unverified.
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2020/6/27/1956352/-Additional-sources-confirm-Russian-cash-for-corpses-program-that-paid-for-death-of-American-soldiers
Jul 3, 2020 14:15:03 #
Michael Rich
Loc: Lapine Oregon
moldyoldy wrote:
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2020/6/27/1956352/-Additional-sources-confirm-Russian-cash-for-corpses-program-that-paid-for-death-of-American-soldiers
The Pentagon outweighs a Washington Compost opinion piece.
You people are supposed to be the ones who listen to the Intel agencies.
Jul 3, 2020 14:20:27 #
moldyoldy wrote:
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2020/6/27/1956352/-Additional-sources-confirm-Russian-cash-for-corpses-program-that-paid-for-death-of-American-soldiers
There they go again: NYT serves up spy fantasy about Russian ‘bounties’ on US troops in Afghanistan
by Nebojsa Malic
(Malic is a Serbian-American journalist, blogger and t***slator, who wrote a regular column for Antiwar.com from 2000 to 2015.
Brace yourselves for another breathless Russia bombshell: The New York Times says US spies think Moscow may have offered Taliban bounty money to k**l US troops in Afghanistan and Trump was told but did nothing about it! Impeach!
“American intelligence officials have concluded that a Russian military intelligence unit secretly offered bounties to Taliban-linked militants for k*****g coalition forces in Afghanistan,” begins the story, published on Friday afternoon, and citing “officials briefed on the matter.”
This “intelligence finding” was briefed to President Donald Trump in late March, but the White House “has yet to authorize” any of the proposed responses, according to the Times.
Within minutes, a former FBI official (now working at NBC) was declaring Trump “Putin’s puppet,” while Congressman Ted Lieu (D-California) said the lack of response “suggests Trump may be beholden to Putin.”
The story itself – hidden behind the Times’s paywall, of course, so the commoners not subscribed to their unmatched wisdom can only go on the clickbaity headline – is that the unnamed US intelligence officials “concluded” that a Russian unit “linked to” a massive conspiracy against the West secretly offered money to the Taliban, and “Islamist militants, or armed criminal elements closely associated with them, are believed to have collected” some of it at some point, maybe.
This assessment is “said to be based at least in part on interrogations of captured Afghan militants and criminals,” who are totally trustworthy and would not at all ever say anything to try and avoid torture in Afghan prisons, globally known as bastions of human rights and democracy.
You’re not supposed to notice all the qualifiers and weasel words, however, but focus on the razzle-dazzle “facts” such as the entirely baseless claim that Russia is conducting a “so-called hybrid war against the United States, a strategy of destabilizing adversaries through a combination of such tactics as cyberattacks, the spread of f**e news and covert and deniable military operations.” This assertion, by the way, is mentioned in passing as an established and unquestionable fact, a favorite tactic of propaganda-peddlers anywhere.
But wait, there’s more. The anonymous officials said the spies had “assessed” the operation to be the work of “Unit 29155” of the “GRU,” which is “linked to the March 2018 nerve agent poisoning in Salisbury” – the infamous Skripal incident that the UK “highly likely” declared the work of Russia and then treated that assertion as fact. Supposedly, there is “uncertainty” among US spies whether this is a rogue operation or one authorized from the very top of the Kremlin.
If you can’t trust anonymous intelligence officials, after all, who can you trust? It’s not as if the US “intelligence community” had accused Russia of “hacking our democracy” based on a dodgy dossier written by a British spy and paid for by Hillary Clinton’s campaign, in order to get the FBI to spy on President Donald Trump’s campaign before and after the 2016 e******n, right? All based on “assessments” and beliefs, no less! We should totally trust them when they talk about rogue spy operations – in Russia, obviously, what did you think I was suggesting?
Besides, it’s not as if the New York Times – that bastion of t***h-telling that earned numerous Pulitzers for ‘Russiagate’ coverage – could ever print something that wasn’t thoroughly vetted and properly sourced, right? I mean, the story has four – four – bylines, and the newsroom did not revolt the way they had over the recent op-ed by Senator Tom Cotton, so it must be unimpeachably true!
Buried deep inside the story is the admission that the Taliban “have not attacked American positions” since February, after the US signed an agreement with the militants to withdraw from Afghanistan. That, by the way, was greeted with wailing and gnashing of the teeth by the US political establishment – including the Times – which has been committed to having other people fight and die in Afghanistan forever in the name of democracy, human rights or... something. Clearly, Trump is only pulling out of there not because he disapproves of Americans dying in endless foreign wars but because of Russia!
By all means, go ahead and take at face value the evidence-free assertions of a newspaper whose mendacious 1619 Project is in great part responsible for setting US race relations on fire, and the country with them – and sourced to anonymous spies who have been consistently and terrifyingly wrong on just about everything. Enough of you have done it enough of the time so far, and look how well it has worked out!
Jul 3, 2020 14:33:54 #
moldyoldy wrote:
Somebody is ignorant.
The Ten Commandments, also known in Christianity as the Decalogue, are a set of biblical principles relating to ethics and worship. These are fundamental to both Judaism and Christianity. The text of the Ten Commandments appears twice in the Hebrew Bible: at Exodus 20:2-17 and Deuteronomy 5:6-21. Wikipedia
The Ten Commandments, also known in Christianity as the Decalogue, are a set of biblical principles relating to ethics and worship. These are fundamental to both Judaism and Christianity. The text of the Ten Commandments appears twice in the Hebrew Bible: at Exodus 20:2-17 and Deuteronomy 5:6-21. Wikipedia
So, the words "you shall not k**l" is religion fact? And "you shall not steal" the same? "You shall not lie"
We true Americans can see why you C****es what to ban it, it's all the s**t you do every day.
Jul 3, 2020 14:42:19 #
Smedley_buzk**l wrote:
Which of the ten comments would you like me to commandment on?
Did you ever read them? I wager not.
Jul 3, 2020 14:58:32 #
byronglimish wrote:
The Pentagon outweighs a Washington Compost opinion piece.
You people are supposed to be the ones who listen to the Intel agencies.
You people are supposed to be the ones who listen to the Intel agencies.
You provided no source, where is your pentagon source, and not some guy who started last week.
Jul 3, 2020 15:47:04 #
moldyoldy wrote:
You provided no source, where is your pentagon source, and not some guy who started last week.
Would it make any difference to you? No, not at all. You have been brander for life with the sad liberal code.
Jul 3, 2020 16:00:15 #
Michael Rich
Loc: Lapine Oregon
moldyoldy wrote:
You provided no source, where is your pentagon source, and not some guy who started last week.
The story was in the Washington Examiner 3 days ago, but you won't look it up.
Here's a little goody for the forth.
Jul 3, 2020 16:02:01 #
Peewee
Loc: San Antonio, TX
byronglimish wrote:
The story was in the Washington Examiner 3 days ago, but you won't look it up.
Here's a little goody for the forth.
Here's a little goody for the forth.
Jul 3, 2020 16:49:04 #
byronglimish wrote:
The story was in the Washington Examiner 3 days ago, but you won't look it up.
Here's a little goody for the forth.
Here's a little goody for the forth.
That is right wing lie sheet it never gets the facts straight and never corrects their stories.
Jul 3, 2020 17:27:59 #
Bebida
Loc: Michigan
Peewee wrote:
An unverified assertion, not supported by the intel agencies who provide the briefings. Try again, Moldy.
You mean MORE F**E NEWS?? OH NO!! Whoda THUNKIT???
Jul 5, 2020 08:24:22 #
moldyoldy wrote:
That is right wing lie sheet it never gets the facts straight and never corrects their stories.
That sounds more like the New York Times and the LA Times.
Jul 5, 2020 08:24:50 #
byronglimish wrote:
The story was in the Washington Examiner 3 days ago, but you won't look it up.
Here's a little goody for the forth.
Here's a little goody for the forth.
Good job.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.