News, from snowflake central
Jul 1, 2020 12:57:55 #
[quote=moldyoldy][quote=WEBCO]Really, where are they then?
You are the first reporter I've heard that from.
Destroying or deleting emails under subpoena is a crime.
This is stupid statement, even from you.[/
The FBI has reportedly recovered both personal and work-related emails from Hillary Clinton’s private computer server that she used during her time as secretary of state. The FBI is investigating the reasoning behind the presence of classified information on the server, and the remainder of the probe will take an additional several months. Also Tuesday, the Democratic p**********l frontrunner dismissed a Washington Post report that claims the State Department’s request for her emails was “prompted entirely by the discovery that Clinton had exclusively used a private email system.” The report contradicts what Clinton has maintained, which is that the department asked for her emails as part of a routine record-keeping effort to archive “everything from other secretaries of state, not just me,” as she said Sunday. When a Des Moines Register asked Clinton about the discrepancy between her and the State Department’s accounts, she said she didn’t know.
Daily Beast[/quote]
Yes that pertains to the 30,000 emails she did hand over, which DID contain classified information.
It doesn't mention the 30,000 she deleted. It is also 4 years old.
Nice try though
You are the first reporter I've heard that from.
Destroying or deleting emails under subpoena is a crime.
This is stupid statement, even from you.[/
The FBI has reportedly recovered both personal and work-related emails from Hillary Clinton’s private computer server that she used during her time as secretary of state. The FBI is investigating the reasoning behind the presence of classified information on the server, and the remainder of the probe will take an additional several months. Also Tuesday, the Democratic p**********l frontrunner dismissed a Washington Post report that claims the State Department’s request for her emails was “prompted entirely by the discovery that Clinton had exclusively used a private email system.” The report contradicts what Clinton has maintained, which is that the department asked for her emails as part of a routine record-keeping effort to archive “everything from other secretaries of state, not just me,” as she said Sunday. When a Des Moines Register asked Clinton about the discrepancy between her and the State Department’s accounts, she said she didn’t know.
Daily Beast[/quote]
Yes that pertains to the 30,000 emails she did hand over, which DID contain classified information.
It doesn't mention the 30,000 she deleted. It is also 4 years old.
Nice try though
Jul 1, 2020 14:07:39 #
WEBCO wrote:
Yes that pertains to the 30,000 emails she did hand over, which DID contain classified information.
It doesn't mention the 30,000 she deleted. It is also 4 years old.
Nice try though
It doesn't mention the 30,000 she deleted. It is also 4 years old.
Nice try though
E mails have a sender and receiver. Any relevant e mail could be checked on the other end. But there was nothing worth checking . As for any deletions, a staff member answered the request and deleted personal e mails.
Jul 1, 2020 14:52:18 #
moldyoldy wrote:
E mails have a sender and receiver. Any relevant e mail could be checked on the other end. But there was nothing worth checking . As for any deletions, a staff member answered the request and deleted personal e mails.
I'm sorry but a staffer doesn't have the authority to delete subpoenaed emails. No one does. Its really simple
Jul 1, 2020 16:00:42 #
WEBCO wrote:
I'm sorry but a staffer doesn't have the authority to delete subpoenaed emails. No one does. Its really simple
The request was for pertinent e mails, things about her daughter did not count.
Jul 1, 2020 18:09:52 #
moldyoldy wrote:
The request was for pertinent e mails, things about her daughter did not count.
It wasn't a request, it was a subpoena to hand over "all" emails.
Jul 1, 2020 18:12:20 #
WEBCO wrote:
It wasn't a request, it was a subpoena to hand over "all" emails.
May I see your copy of the subpoena?
Jul 1, 2020 18:30:27 #
[quote=WEBCO]It wasn't a request, it was a subpoena to hand over "all" emails.[/
March 4, 2015: The B******i committee issues a subpoena requiring Clinton to turn over all emails from her private server related to the incident in Libya.
March 4, 2015: The B******i committee issues a subpoena requiring Clinton to turn over all emails from her private server related to the incident in Libya.
Jul 1, 2020 20:40:14 #
nwtk2007
Loc: Texas
[quote=moldyoldy][quote=WEBCO]It wasn't a request, it was a subpoena to hand over "all" emails.[/
March 4, 2015: The B******i committee issues a subpoena requiring Clinton to turn over all emails from her private server related to the incident in Libya.[/quote]
It is hard to understand why moldy defends Clinton on this. Even IF they acted appropriately, her hiding her emails and server "stuff" is not dependable. We're it Trump,he'd be ready to lynch.
March 4, 2015: The B******i committee issues a subpoena requiring Clinton to turn over all emails from her private server related to the incident in Libya.[/quote]
It is hard to understand why moldy defends Clinton on this. Even IF they acted appropriately, her hiding her emails and server "stuff" is not dependable. We're it Trump,he'd be ready to lynch.
Jul 1, 2020 20:42:48 #
moldyoldy wrote:
Barr misinterpreted the mueller report.
Really. What is your interpretation?
And who do you think should interpret the report?
Jul 1, 2020 20:50:05 #
promilitary wrote:
Really. What is your interpretation?
And who do you think should interpret the report?
And who do you think should interpret the report?
If he had released the summary that was provided there would be no controversy. He rewrote it to defend trump who is guilty of multiple crimes.
Jul 1, 2020 21:05:28 #
moldyoldy wrote:
If he had released the summary that was provided there would be no controversy. He rewrote it to defend trump who is guilty of multiple crimes.
He didn't re-write anything.
And what crimes exactly? I hear that often but nobody is ever specific.
Unlike Obama's crimes which were easily identified.
Jul 1, 2020 22:49:56 #
promilitary wrote:
He didn't re-write anything.
And what crimes exactly? I hear that often but nobody is ever specific.
Unlike Obama's crimes which were easily identified.
And what crimes exactly? I hear that often but nobody is ever specific.
Unlike Obama's crimes which were easily identified.
Read what mueller wrote
Jul 1, 2020 23:12:08 #
Crayons
Loc: St Jo, Texas
promilitary wrote:
This was BEFORE Barr; where were you and who were you listening to?
He was listenin to, and g***med by Rev. Wright
Jul 2, 2020 01:04:48 #
moldyoldy wrote:
Read what mueller wrote
He didn't write anything. He was a figurehead.
Jul 2, 2020 02:55:06 #
moldyoldy wrote:
Read what mueller wrote
Anybody, and I mean ANYBODY who watched Muellers testimony knows that he had no idea of what was in "his" report. He didn't even know who the main players were.
It's kinda ironic, both Mueller and Biden play the same part...that of a puppet.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.