One Political PlazaSM - Home of politics
Hang him from a great oak tree.
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 next>>
Jun 29, 2020 14:01:35   #
permafrost Loc: Minnesota
 
useful mattoid 45 wrote:
I do wonder why the evangelicals have such a crush on him.

He doesn't attend church. He doesn't read the bible. Fake Christian.

I'd venture he's probably paid for a few abortion in his lifetime. We know from the firsthand molestation accounts that he doesn't use a condom.


I bet you are correct..

Also, can not find it in myself to believe anyone who would support trump can be a true Christian.. I simply is not possible.

| Reply
Jun 29, 2020 14:10:15   #
useful mattoid 45
 
Yes, the true nutjobs are absolutely certain Jesus was a light skinned Middle Easterner.

Their bubble is thin and there are a lot of sharp objects around. Truth being one of them :)

| Reply
Jun 29, 2020 14:47:28   #
Fit2BTied Loc: Texas
 
permafrost wrote:
LOL,,, how long do you think it will take brightbarf to print this??

Or do you prefer some other cage liner for your news??
Hold the phone, there permafrost. I decided to "fact check" your meme. And I call BS
https://www.thebalance.com/deficit-by-president-what-budget-deficits-hide-3306151

Since Barack Obama was the president with the largest deficits and deficit increase...
"President Obama had the largest deficits. By the end of his final budget, FY 2017, his budget deficits totaled $6.781 trillion. That's a 58% increase"

So I thought, what could the meme be trying to say. Well, if you look year to year, Obama did "reduce the deficit"
FY 2010 - $1.5 trillion
FY 2011 - $1.300 trillion. (see, it went down)
FY 2012 - $1.077 trillion. (down again)
FY 2013 - $680 billion. (nice)
FY 2014 - $485 billion. (keep it up)
FY 2015 - $442 billion. (sweet)
FY 2016 - $585 billion. (oops...)
FY 2017 - $665 billion. (well, dangit...)

So - using that same logic...

George W Bush
FY 2004 - $413 billion.
FY 2005 - $318 billion. v
FY 2006 - $248 billion. v
FY 2007 - $161 billion. v

George H. W. Bush
FY 1992 - $290 billion.
FY 1993 - $255 billion. v

Ronald Reagan
FY 1983 - $208 billion.
FY 1984 - $185 billion. v
and
FY 1986 - $221 billion.
FY 1987 - $150 billion. v
and
FY 1988 - $155 billion.
FY 1989 - $153 billion. v

So Clinton, an unqualified yes
Everyone else both raised and lowered the deficit during their administration.
Thanks for playing...

| Reply
Jun 29, 2020 16:25:37   #
Navigator
 
permafrost wrote:
"Imagine wearing the uniform of the United States military, and learning that Russia is paying bounties to Afghan soldiers to kill you. Then you hear that your commander in chief has not only known about this for months and not only done nothing, but has actively courted the Russian president.”
#PutinsPuppet
#CadetBoneSpurs
#TraitorTrump


You do realize the Taliban need no incentive to kill American soldiers when they want to? This is a totally fake story, it never happened and Trump was never briefed on it because the President is usually not briefed on things that didn't happen.

| Reply
Jun 29, 2020 17:22:29   #
Carol Kelly
 
proud republican wrote:
BS post , permy!!! Have you heard of Innocent until proven Guilty???? Traitor?? Obama was traitor , selling guns to Mexico which killed our
American citizen ,probably more than one (Fast &Furious )What else are you going to blame Trump for ???? Tomorrow you probably will blame him for JFK Assassination!!! You Arses never stop!!!!
BS post , permy!!! Have you heard of Innocent ... (show quote)


Amen, pr.

| Reply
Jun 29, 2020 18:36:22   #
useful mattoid 45
 
Navigator wrote:
You do realize the Taliban need no incentive to kill American soldiers when they want to? This is a totally fake story, it never happened and Trump was never briefed on it because the President is usually not briefed on things that didn't happen.


... and even if he was briefed, he WOULDN'T LISTEN. Cuz, ya know, that's who he is. Smartest guy around.

| Reply
Jun 29, 2020 19:32:34   #
nwtk2007
 
permafrost wrote:
Yes, nwtk, it all goes on and on..

Congress demands answers from Trump administration on Russia bounty intelligence

A bipartisan group of congressional leaders is demanding the Trump administration explain what it knew about reports US intelligence concluded Russia offered bounties to Taliban fighters to kill US troops.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi on Monday and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer called on Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe and CIA Director Gina Haspel to provide all-member briefings to Congress on the intelligence, while Senate Republicans say they are seeking more information from the Trump administration, too.
"Congress and the country need answers now," wrote Pelosi, a Democrat from California. "Congress needs to know what the intelligence community knows about this significant threat to American troops and our allies and what options are available to hold Russia accountable. The Administration's disturbing silence and inaction endanger the lives of our troops and our coalition partners."
Yes, nwtk, it all goes on and on.. br br Congres... (show quote)


Not a single intel org has corroborated it. Like the accusers of Kavanaugh. That is the answer. Period. All Trump can do is comment on what intel tells him. Or do you think he has Rudi over there with "evidence" of it?? Or maybe he heard from the Taliban secretary? And since when does or did the Taliban need to be paid to shoot Americans?

And of course your sources of this, NYT and WaPo corroborated each others stories!

| Reply
Jun 29, 2020 19:34:17   #
nwtk2007
 
Navigator wrote:
You do realize the Taliban need no incentive to kill American soldiers when they want to? This is a totally fake story, it never happened and Trump was never briefed on it because the President is usually not briefed on things that didn't happen.


I am betting that there was never even a rumor suggesting it!

| Reply
Jun 29, 2020 19:51:01   #
useful mattoid 45
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
I am betting that there was never even a rumor suggesting it!
I am betting that there was never even a rumor sug... (show quote)


You'd lose that bet.

| Reply
Jun 29, 2020 20:04:32   #
TexaCan Loc: Heart in W Texas - feet on the beach in Al.
 
permafrost wrote:
I bet you are correct..

Also, can not find it in myself to believe anyone who would support trump can be a true Christian.. I simply is not possible.


And I can’t believe that a Christian could be a Democrat and support the senseless slaughter of millions of babies! What would you say when he asked you about the method that pulls the arms and legs off of their little bodies?👿👿👿👿👿. You don’t have a clue who Christians are!

| Reply
Jun 29, 2020 22:05:08   #
useful mattoid 45
 
TexaCan wrote:
And I can’t believe that a Christian could be a Democrat and support the senseless slaughter of millions of babies! What would you say when he asked you about the method that pulls the arms and legs off of their little bodies?👿👿👿👿👿. You don’t have a clue who Christians are!


Chalking you up as another nutjob.

Sorry Texcan, your babble is old. Many Catholics, Christians etc have had abortions. It's the woman's choice.

Please don't faint. Your nutjobbery would be missed.

| Reply
Jun 29, 2020 22:27:47   #
TexaCan Loc: Heart in W Texas - feet on the beach in Al.
 
useful mattoid 45 wrote:
Chalking you up as another nutjob.

Sorry Texcan, your babble is old. Many Catholics, Christians etc have had abortions. It's the woman's choice.

Please don't faint. Your nutjobbery would be missed.


Oh sweetie, no pansy ass like you could make me faint...I don’t faint! Yes, it is a woman’s choice........murder her baby or give birth to him/her and either keep it or give it up for adoption! It doesn’t matter if the woman is the queen of England, a Saint, a Catholic, a Baptist, or a hooker!.........abortion is the taking of another’s life! MURDER!

| Reply
Jun 29, 2020 22:50:51   #
useful mattoid 45
 
Please keep your tackle safe, texcan

Do not masturbate! That is denying life too.

| Reply
Jun 29, 2020 23:11:17   #
TexaCan Loc: Heart in W Texas - feet on the beach in Al.
 
useful mattoid 45 wrote:
Please keep your tackle safe, texcan

Do not masturbate! That is denying life too.


You’re not shocking me!😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

| Reply
Jun 29, 2020 23:24:44   #
nwtk2007
 
useful mattoid 45 wrote:
Please keep your tackle safe, texcan

Do not masturbate! That is denying life too.



| Reply
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 next>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2020 IDF International Technologies, Inc.