One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
House republican shatters conservative dreams of impeachment
Page <<first <prev 7 of 7
Jul 18, 2014 12:10:51   #
Sicilianthing
 
DennisDee wrote:
Anyway you look at it the cost was high 650,000 Americans died. In a nation of 30 Million. That would be line 7 Million dead today.


Pray for Peace
Pray for your Peaceful V**e change
Prepare for battle.

Reply
Jul 18, 2014 13:12:50   #
Retired669
 
Bruce Kennedy wrote:
That very well may happen, but that will in no way include Liberals. That may do the trick in getting rid of the "Tea Party". Let's start with the KKK. There's another treasonous organization, who doesn't support the Constitution. It's about time we closed that sad chapter, in American history. You know I was a little frustrated the other day and when I get frustrated I need a release, something to pick my spirits up. So I went out and bought a Confederate f**g and burned it. I felt great. Talk about an emotional high. I usually try and find something associated with the old Confederacy and destroy it. You'd think it would have been destroyed after the Civil War. But it seems to be like a chronic disease. You can still find "Rebel" s**t, being sold. You know a friend of mine once told me..."The South shall rise again...because s**t floats". Ain't it the t***h.
That very well may happen, but that will in no way... (show quote)


:thumbup: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Reply
Jul 18, 2014 15:16:35   #
Bigmac495 Loc: Indiana
 
Retired669 wrote:
Night work would work for me thumper. Have you seen some of those scopes for night hunting? I could see you baggers from a long way off. :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:


You think you are going to be the only one with a rifle and night vision scope in the U.S.!
Maybe you right about people overseas , but you better re-think the U.S.people!

Reply
 
 
Jul 18, 2014 23:24:00   #
BigMike Loc: yerington nv
 
Bruce Kennedy wrote:
Uh, I guess the Independents will do as they did, in the last e******n and reject "Right Wing Radicalism". Maybe, once again, we'll hear all the Conservative pundits denouncing the polls and predicting land slide victories over Democrats, like they did in 2012.

You mention Obama's policies, the only thing about Obama's policies is they will continue to be obstructed, as they have been, since his first day in office. But just as the Conservative loons vowed to make Obama a "One term President", they will fail again. The ACA is already a success. And this just galls the obstructionist Conservatives. Yet they will continue to waste Americans time and money trying to repeal the program. After all they wasted Congress', and ultimately American's, time on 47 useless and meaningless v**es, in the House to repeal the ACA. About the only thing Republicans are good for is obstructionism and wasting American's time. And I feel fairly confident that the Conservative "loons" will try and impeach Obama, and after another failed attempt to convict on articles of impeachment the American people are going to be thoroughly fed up with the "loony Right" and ensure that Democrats have the Presidency for at least eight more years.
Uh, I guess the Independents will do as they did, ... (show quote)


Conservative pundits? Like who? Dick Morris? Sean Hannity? Rush Limbaugh? Those people play to an audience. I don't listen to any of them, even if they are right at times.

Obama deserves to be impeached, but I'll bet that it never becomes a serious priority for most conservatives. Limiting the damage he does during his last three (obstruction, to liberals) years will be, though. So, yeah, the Con Man in Chief is going to get stymied. Conservatives swear that Obama gets wh**ever he wants and liberals swear he gets blocked at every turn. It's a bunch of hogwash to me. The ACA is a fool's law, passed by fools, for fools. If that's your guy's crowning achievement, then man, does he suck!

I wouldn't worry too much, though, if I were you. If it's the policies and not the person that matters the most to you, then it will comfort you to know that the Establishment Republicans, who are over a barrel because of the TP, and desperately want to appear as conservatives to the base, have the same goals as your guy, they just don't want it to look that way, especially with an e******n coming. Once they're safely in office it will be business as usual - more spending, more taxes, more dependent Americans, fewer freedoms. You won't even be able to tell the difference

Reply
Jul 18, 2014 23:52:41   #
BigMike Loc: yerington nv
 
Bruce Kennedy wrote:
Look I can only do so much, I can't keep up with all of you. First of all, and I know this will be breaking news for you, there are over 300 million people in the U.S. There is no one in this country that doesn't have someone that doesn't dislike them. Obama is the President of the United States, that position alone comes with millions of people that dislike whoever is in that office. The Chicago thing is a "City" issue. It is not Obama's personal responsibility. Now overall crime and homicides, in this country, is an issue that Obama should address, on a Federal level. He has no business meddling in City or State affairs, unless of course there are federal issues involved. He can comment on them and make his feelings known but it is the City's responsibility to address the issue of violence and take concrete measures to deal with the situation. I know how Conservatives are lazy, and like to blame Obama for everything, but contrary to a Conservative's belief Obama doesn't control the purse strings of the U.S. government. He can ask for money to do things, but it is the House of Representatives who have to approve whether the money is allocated or not. So ignorant statements like "Obama is spending all this money on the border" is a display of sheer ignorance. And there is another thing, the President of the United States has more than one issue to deal with. The "border issue" is a direct responsibility of the Federal government. It is easy to attack Obama on one issue. We know it's easy to attack him on one issue, because Conservatives do it. And they can only do things that are easy, primarily because they are simple minded. So when you post anecdotal examples like the one here, dealing with the Chicago crime problem, I say who gives a rat's a$$. Yes there is always someone going to bit*h about something. And the reality is no one is going to solve every problem. Conservatives never solve problems, they create them, then pass those problems on to others. And then ultimately blame those they dumped the problem on. It's a neat little system they are never held accountable for the messes they make they just leave the messes for others to clean up. Face it Conservatives are children, they are not adults. I for one am shocked, that hypocritical Conservatives bring this issue to light. They always seem to be the ones screaming about "personal responsibility" and now they seem to be siding with individuals, who they despise, who want to make this a federal issue. Isn't this the exact thing Conservatives bit*h about all the time? People not taking responsibility to clean up their own messes and quit asking for federal assistance. Conservatives never cease to amaze me, every time I think they can't take hypocrisy to a new level, voilĂ , they've done it. What is amazing is that Conservatives are so focused on negative publicity about Obama, they can't see the overall picture. Here is an article about some b****s, in Chicago, saying negative things about Obama. One in particular implies that Obama may go down as the worst President, in history. Yet Conservatives miss the "Big Picture", that here are a group of citizens asking for help from the federal government and not dealing with the problem, themselves. This is the heart of the Conservative's core values, a "smaller" Federal government and "personal responsibility" and they forsake all of their principles, just because they heard someone bad mouthing Obama. Conservatives have no "principles", they are amoral.
Look I can only do so much, I can't keep up with a... (show quote)


That's just dumb! This conservative wouldn't mind programs that were designed to make folks independent, but they aren't. They're designed to keep people dependent. Proof? More people than ever are on them and they're getting poorer.

People have to be adults and take care of themselves. An adult might need a hand up at some point in their lives, but we don't need to raise adults as if they were children.

You think you're altruistic and caring, and I understand why, but ultimately, anything that makes more people dependent on the government is a disservice to them and the taxpayers who are already under seige.

Obama is a con-man. Period. And you put him in office. If I'd v**ed for him I'd be embarassed at being fooled so badly. Mark Twain said, 'It's easier to fool a man than to convince him he's been fooled'. I don't need pundits or links or clever little pictures or emotional rhetoric to explain to me what's going on here.

Reply
Jul 19, 2014 09:29:50   #
Bigmac495 Loc: Indiana
 
BigMike wrote:
That's just dumb! This conservative wouldn't mind programs that were designed to make folks independent, but they aren't. They're designed to keep people dependent. Proof? More people than ever are on them and they're getting poorer.

People have to be adults and take care of themselves. An adult might need a hand up at some point in their lives, but we don't need to raise adults as if they were children.

You think you're altruistic and caring, and I understand why, but ultimately, anything that makes more people dependent on the government is a disservice to them and the taxpayers who are already under seige.

Obama is a con-man. Period. And you put him in office. If I'd v**ed for him I'd be embarassed at being fooled so badly. Mark Twain said, 'It's easier to fool a man than to convince him he's been fooled'. I don't need pundits or links or clever little pictures or emotional rhetoric to explain to me what's going on here.
That's just dumb! This conservative wouldn't mind ... (show quote)


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
Jul 19, 2014 10:07:09   #
Bigmac495 Loc: Indiana
 
karpenter wrote:
Never Mind That

LIES !! ALL LIES !!!


In reply to Dennis Dee's post that said, Borrowing and spending are lower in Reagan's years. And carpenter says is all lies:
When Reagan took office;
National debt went from 712 billion to 2.012 trillion
Obama's went from 5.14 trillion to 10.95 trillion in just 6 years
Reagan: Unemployment from 13.5% to 5.4 %
Obama: 5.0 % to 8.3 %
Reagan: cost of living from 10% to 4.0%
Obama: Can't compare because groceries and gasoline not included in Obama's report.

Reply
 
 
Jul 19, 2014 10:32:29   #
VladimirPee
 
Actually Reagans went to 2.9 trillion

Obama took over at 10 Trillion and now its 17.5 trillion


Bigmac495 wrote:
In reply to Dennis Dee's post that said, Borrowing and spending are lower in Reagan's years. And carpenter says is all lies:
When Reagan took office;
National debt went from 712 billion to 2.012 trillion
Obama's went from 5.14 trillion to 10.95 trillion in just 6 years
Reagan: Unemployment from 13.5% to 5.4 %
Obama: 5.0 % to 8.3 %
Reagan: cost of living from 10% to 4.0%
Obama: Can't compare because groceries and gasoline not included in Obama's report.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 7 of 7
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.