Kevyn wrote:
Amid a dramatic rise in spending on police and prisons while funding for vital social services has shrunk or disappeared altogether, a movement to defund police gains 'unprecedented' support across US
Government officials have long dismissed the idea as a l*****t fantasy, but the recent unrest and massive budget shortfalls from the C****-** crisis appear to have inspired more mainstream recognition of the central arguments behind defunding.
“To see legislators who aren’t even necessarily on the left supporting at least a significant decrease in New York police department [NYPD] funding is really very encouraging,” Julia Salazar, a New York state senator and Democratic socialist, told the Guardian on Tuesday. “It feels a little bit surreal.”
Floyd’s death on camera in Minneapolis, advocates say, was a powerful demonstration that police reform efforts of the last half-decade have failed to stop r****t policing and k*****gs. Meanwhile, the striking visuals of enormous, militarized and at times violent police forces responding to peaceful protests have led some politicians to question whether police really need this much money and firepower.
Amid a dramatic rise in spending on police and pri... (
show quote)
You can depend on the political leadership in places like NYC, Minneapolis, Chicago and others to do precisely the wrong thing at the right time.
Instead of addressing the root causes of an issue such as "Police Brutality" or the judgement of Politicians who have ordered police to stand down, and let the l**ters destroy and steal from small businesses, their solution is to defund the police.
Why does the public not hold them accountable for their failure to look into these issues:
1. Police Training. "When McKinney, TX police officer David Eric Casebolt brutally took down a teenage girl at a pool party in June, he was using a form of martial arts called Krav Maga in which he trained exclusively. These combat techniques were developed by the Israel Defense Forces (IDF).
This is a small reflection of a larger reality that exists in U.S. law enforcement, one that helps explain the brutality and militarization that now characterizes so many police forces. Since 9/11, cops have been traveling abroad to learn from one of the most repressive and dangerous State forces in the world today—the Israeli military and intelligence apparatus."
https://thefreethoughtproject.com/u-s-police-routinely-travel-israel-learn-methods-brutality-repression/2. Why do Police Unions Protect Bad Cops- "Unions are required under the duty of fair representation covered by the National Labor Relations Act and state laws to give the best possible protections, including legal aid and support in job negotiations, to all their members." But "Police unions, in acts that go beyond their legally required duties, also leverage the public's high regard for law enforcement to impede policy changes. Unions have aggressively lobbied against prison sentencing reform and reducing police militarization. And they've been some of the most vocal critics and skeptics of police-worn body cameras that would record officers in the line of duty.
Some criminal justice experts worry unions' power and single-mindedness — and the attention dev**ed to unions in public discourse — make it more difficult to bring change from within police departments. By going after anyone who dares criticize police officers, unions may stamp out real dissent within the rank and file of police departments."
https://www.vox.com/2014/12/18/7415135/police-unions3. The increasing "Militarization of the Police Force" - Police militarization involves agencies changing themselves to follow the principles of the military such as Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT) teams that have worked their way into county sheriff’s offices and smaller police departments. Has anyone questioned the concept that militarization weakens the community relations necessary for effective policing?
https://leb.fbi.gov/articles/featured-articles/police-militarization4. The issue of Civil Asset Forfeiture - What Is Civil Asset Forfeiture?
Civil asset forfeiture (CAF) is a major driver in the militarization of the police force. Put simply, CAF is a legal principle that allows police to seize money and property from suspected criminals, which they can do without a warrant because the suspect’s property doesn’t have the presumption of innocence.
CAF is effectively a legally allowed form of theft by police officers. Here is a short list of military hardware purchased with CAF funds:
$5 million helicopter for the Los Angeles Police Department
$1 million mobile command bus for Prince George County, Maryland
$227,000 for a tank in Douglasville, GA
$54,000 for 27 M-4 assault rifles in Braselton, GA
https://fee.org/articles/the-militarization-of-americas-police-a-brief-history/