One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Who, besides Barak Obama considers what happened to Mr.Floyd "normal"?
Page <<first <prev 5 of 6 next>
Jun 6, 2020 17:02:56   #
Seth
 
son of witless wrote:
You sold me.



Reply
Jun 8, 2020 21:43:43   #
Boy from the Bronx
 
son of witless wrote:
Obama used the Constitution as toilet paper.


How would you know? What were you doing, staking out his bathroom?

Ha ha ha ha!

Reply
Jun 8, 2020 21:59:20   #
Boy from the Bronx
 
GmanTerry wrote:
Everyone gets their panties is a knot when a cop k**ls a criminal, but there is nary a whisper about all the black on black murders in places like Chicago and Detroit. Why is it OK for b****s to murder b****s? Why isn't anyone concerned enough to at least say something? If black l***s m****r, and they do as all l***s m****r, why does everyone and I mean everyone not give a damn about all the black lives lost weekly by black on black crime? I think this police thing is just an excuse. How else to explain how Chicago and Detroit black deaths are completely ignored by b****s, w****s and hispanics? It makes no sense.

Semper Fi
Everyone gets their panties is a knot when a cop k... (show quote)


Your post is in response to "moldyoldy's post about the Arbury k*****g. If you will recall, Arbury wasn't commiting a crime when he shot to death, he was just jogging (the last time I looked, jogging was no crime). That father and son vigilante group just assumed he was commiting a crime just because he didn't answer when they called upon him to stop, which they had no legal right to do because a) they were not police officers, b) there was nothing to suggest that Arbury was doing anything illegal at the time, especially since he was only JOGGING, and c) they assumed he was doing something bad because he was a black man in a predominantly white area. In other words, his death had nothing to do with being a criminal, because Arbury was NOT a criminal! There's no conceivable way his death could be considered justified. It was cold-blooded murder, pure and simple, no matter how many times you try to deny it or try to blame the victim. I thought they only did that in rape cases!

Reply
 
 
Jun 8, 2020 22:26:55   #
son of witless
 
Boy from the Bronx wrote:
How would you know? What were you doing, staking out his bathroom?

Ha ha ha ha!


When Barak Obama said " "I was a constitutional law professor, which means unlike the current president I actually respect the Constitution." shortly before being elected President, and then went on to disrespect the US Constitution while being President, then it is more than obvious that his only contact with that piece of paper is with his butt.

" Ha ha ha ha " Are you a spotted or a striped Hyaenidae ?

Reply
Jun 8, 2020 22:47:17   #
Boy from the Bronx
 
Seth wrote:
Floyd had been to prison several times, including once for robbing a pregnant woman with a pistol to her belly in the course of a home invasion with some other criminals. Drug possession, assault, just the usual list of pastimes innocent, saintlike human beings are known to indulge in.

Of course, since you never visit any links or read any news articles that don't originate on the far left, you wouldn't know any of that.


So G****e F***d had a previous criminal record. Do you think the cops who choked him to death knew anything about that? Do you think they could tell just by looking at him that he had been in trouble with the law before? Do you think they were psychic, that they could read a suspect's mind? I don't think so!

Besides, the only crime that Floyd was commiting at the time of his death was being in possession of a phony $20 bill. That's hardly a reason for a cop to put his knee upon a guy's chest and press down on him harder and harder until he starts gasping for air and crying out "I can't breathe," and then ignore his cries for help until finally, he dies. His death was a cold-blooded murder and you know it! Nothing and nobody can justify it, even if he was a criminal in the past, and what I've heard, he was trying to reform himself.

Just because someone is a criminal, it doesn't give somebody else a right to k**l him. The seven men who were k**led in the Saint Valentine's Day Massacre (02/14/1929) were all criminals (they were members of George "Bugs" Moran's gang), but that doesn't change the fact that what happened to them was a brutal and deliberate mass execution, especially in the way it was carried out: the hired k**lers (believed to be working for Moran's chief rival, Al "Scarface" Capone) walked into the garage disguised as policemen, and lined the seven gangsters up against a wall, as if they were going to frisk them, and then when their victims' guard was relaxed, they took out machine guns and just mowed them all down!

Of course, a man dying in police custody isn't the same thing as a gangland style "rubout," but if there's no justification for someone's death in the former, then it's just as bad as the latter.

The duty of the police is to arrest people suspected of crimes. It is not their place to k**l suspects without just cause. A police officer is not supposed to act like a vigilante. He is not supposed to play judge, jury, and executioner. His job is to ENFORCE the law, not to break it, or to take it into his own hands. If we were to allow that, then we have no rule of law, and that can only lead to anarchy. You may say we already have anarchy, with all the recent r**ting, l**ting, and unrest as a result of the Floyd k*****g, as well as similar incidents, but it may become worse if we permit the law to be violated by those we pay to uphold it.

Remember what Thomas Jefferson said: "America is a nation of laws, and not of men."

Reply
Jun 8, 2020 22:49:22   #
moldyoldy
 
son of witless wrote:
When Barak Obama said " "I was a constitutional law professor, which means unlike the current president I actually respect the Constitution." shortly before being elected President, and then went on to disrespect the US Constitution while being President, then it is more than obvious that his only contact with that piece of paper is with his butt.

" Ha ha ha ha " Are you a spotted or a striped Hyaenidae ?


The right wing nuts always make that claim but can never say what he did that was wrong.

Reply
Jun 8, 2020 22:55:42   #
son of witless
 
moldyoldy wrote:
The right wing nuts always make that claim but can never say what he did that was wrong.


Just tell me if you truly wish an answer ? I can generally justify everything I post. What I notice is that when I do, my justifications are not responded to. So if you will respond to my answer, I will be more than happy to give you my best. I am tired of wasting my efforts responding to those who fail to honor their side of the conversation.

Reply
 
 
Jun 8, 2020 22:59:05   #
Boy from the Bronx
 
son of witless wrote:
When Barak Obama said " "I was a constitutional law professor, which means unlike the current president I actually respect the Constitution." shortly before being elected President, and then went on to disrespect the US Constitution while being President, then it is more than obvious that his only contact with that piece of paper is with his butt.

" Ha ha ha ha " Are you a spotted or a striped Hyaenidae ?


So you say Obama "went on to disrespect the US Constitution while being President." I suppose Donald Trump has always respected the Constitution?

Reply
Jun 8, 2020 23:22:40   #
Seth
 
Boy from the Bronx wrote:
So G****e F***d had a previous criminal record. Do you think the cops who choked him to death knew anything about that? Do you think they could tell just by looking at him that he had been in trouble with the law before? Do you think they were psychic, that they could read a suspect's mind? I don't think so!

Besides, the only crime that Floyd was commiting at the time of his death was being in possession of a phony $20 bill. That's hardly a reason for a cop to put his knee upon a guy's chest and press down on him harder and harder until he starts gasping for air and crying out "I can't breathe," and then ignore his cries for help until finally, he dies. His death was a cold-blooded murder and you know it! Nothing and nobody can justify it, even if he was a criminal in the past, and what I've heard, he was trying to reform himself.

Just because someone is a criminal, it doesn't give somebody else a right to k**l him. The seven men who were k**led in the Saint Valentine's Day Massacre (02/14/1929) were all criminals (they were members of George "Bugs" Moran's gang), but that doesn't change the fact that what happened to them was a brutal and deliberate mass execution, especially in the way it was carried out: the hired k**lers (believed to be working for Moran's chief rival, Al "Scarface" Capone) walked into the garage disguised as policemen, and lined the seven gangsters up against a wall, as if they were going to frisk them, and then when their victims' guard was relaxed, they took out machine guns and just mowed them all down!

Of course, a man dying in police custody isn't the same thing as a gangland style "rubout," but if there's no justification for someone's death in the former, then it's just as bad as the latter.

The duty of the police is to arrest people suspected of crimes. It is not their place to k**l suspects without just cause. A police officer is not supposed to act like a vigilante. He is not supposed to play judge, jury, and executioner. His job is to ENFORCE the law, not to break it, or to take it into his own hands. If we were to allow that, then we have no rule of law, and that can only lead to anarchy. You may say we already have anarchy, with all the recent r**ting, l**ting, and unrest as a result of the Floyd k*****g, as well as similar incidents, but it may become worse if we permit the law to be violated by those we pay to uphold it.

Remember what Thomas Jefferson said: "America is a nation of laws, and not of men."
So G****e F***d had a previous criminal record. Do... (show quote)


There you go, pulling the L*****t Word Twist®, just like the MSM and the Dems do to Trump.

You find one single post in which I said I approved or even excused Chauvin's murder of Floyd. Go on, start looking, but plan to spend years searching because you won't find one.

What I have said is that making Floyd into a saint, or another Ghandi like you folks seem to be doing is pretty dumb -- as far as I'm concerned, wh**ever that cop gets, he deserves for murdering Floyd, but it gets tired hearing a bunch of i***ts making a Messiah out of a scumbag who once shoved a pistol into a pregnant woman's belly and listened to her plead for her life in the course of a home invasion. Had there been any real justice, the maggot would've gotten a bullet in the back of the head rather than five years in prison.

But then again, maybe you feel differently, maybe you believe that a career criminal should be canonized. Maybe you're one of the fine folks who spent the last few nights l**ting, burning and battering innocent people. Who's to say?

Reply
Jun 8, 2020 23:36:53   #
moldyoldy
 
son of witless wrote:
Just tell me if you truly wish an answer ? I can generally justify everything I post. What I notice is that when I do, my justifications are not responded to. So if you will respond to my answer, I will be more than happy to give you my best. I am tired of wasting my efforts responding to those who fail to honor their side of the conversation.


Show me what you got. I may be going to bed soon so my reply will be morning

Reply
Jun 9, 2020 09:12:46   #
son of witless
 
Boy from the Bronx wrote:
So you say Obama "went on to disrespect the US Constitution while being President." I suppose Donald Trump has always respected the Constitution?


President Trump did not come to Washington with a chip on his shoulder against the traditional values that America was founded on.

Here is an article laying out the crap that your hero the mighty and awesome Barak Obama did.

https://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/top-10-ways-obama-violated-constitution-during-presidency

The chip on Donald John Trump's shoulder was against the DC Swamp who long ago forgot that they are the servants of the people, not their masters.

Reply
 
 
Jun 9, 2020 09:56:31   #
Seth
 
son of witless wrote:
President Trump did not come to Washington with a chip on his shoulder against the traditional values that America was founded on.

Here is an article laying out the crap that your hero the mighty and awesome Barak Obama did.

https://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/top-10-ways-obama-violated-constitution-during-presidency

The chip on Donald John Trump's shoulder was against the DC Swamp who long ago forgot that they are the servants of the people, not their masters.



Reply
Jun 9, 2020 10:01:08   #
moldyoldy
 
son of witless wrote:
President Trump did not come to Washington with a chip on his shoulder against the traditional values that America was founded on.

Here is an article laying out the crap that your hero the mighty and awesome Barak Obama did.

https://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/top-10-ways-obama-violated-constitution-during-presidency

The chip on Donald John Trump's shoulder was against the DC Swamp who long ago forgot that they are the servants of the people, not their masters.


He did a great job, considering the opposition he faced.

Reply
Jun 9, 2020 10:09:00   #
Seth
 
moldyoldy wrote:
He did a great job, considering the opposition he faced.


So you have no qualms with a l*****t president violating the Constitution on a 9 to 5 basis, no problem with his being corrupt, as long as he's a Democrat, but you also have no problem falsely accusing a conservative president of crimes he hasn't committed.

You are some piece of work!

Reply
Jun 9, 2020 10:17:29   #
moldyoldy
 
Seth wrote:
So you have no qualms with a l*****t president violating the Constitution on a 9 to 5 basis, no problem with his being corrupt, as long as he's a Democrat, but you also have no problem falsely accusing a conservative president of crimes he hasn't committed.

You are some piece of work!


I would expect nothing less from a right wing opinion piece. If he committed crimes the GOP would love to use that to help trump the same way they rehashed Hillary’s e mail just before the e******n.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 5 of 6 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.