On the day when we celebrate heroism of fallen American soldiers ,is one more reminder why NYT became d********g publication
May 25, 2020 05:46:49 #
proud republican
Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
https://www.foxnews.com/media/ny-times-memorial-day-weekend-us-military-celebrates-white-supremacism
Why pick this day to show disgust the for military??
Why pick this day to show disgust the for military??
May 25, 2020 05:58:37 #
proud republican wrote:
https://www.foxnews.com/media/ny-times-memorial-day-weekend-us-military-celebrates-white-supremacism
Why pick this day to show disgust the for military??
Why pick this day to show disgust the for military??
Because the Left, having nothing valid, use their fall back position: "you are a r****t/xenophobe/sexist/homophobe, or just plain stupid."
You will notice this every time they lose an argument or are confronted with facts.....
May 25, 2020 06:00:57 #
proud republican
Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
American Vet wrote:
Because the Left, having nothing valid, use their fall back position: "you are a r****t/xenophobe/sexist/homophobe, or just plain stupid."
You will notice this every time they lose an argument or are confronted with facts.....
You will notice this every time they lose an argument or are confronted with facts.....
You are exactly right!!! Sooooo sad!
May 25, 2020 07:05:35 #
proud republican wrote:
https://www.foxnews.com/media/ny-times-memorial-day-weekend-us-military-celebrates-white-supremacism
Why pick this day to show disgust the for military??
Why pick this day to show disgust the for military??
The article in no way shows disgust for the military. Just the opposite, we allow the dishonor of our military by allowing bases to be named after defeated t*****rous enemies of the US the editorial simply suggests righting a wrong.
May 25, 2020 13:32:05 #
proud republican
Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
Kevyn wrote:
The article in no way shows disgust for the military. Just the opposite, we allow the dishonor of our military by allowing bases to be named after defeated t*****rous enemies of the US the editorial simply suggests righting a wrong.
I'm pretty sure that these names existed during obama Administration ,why NYT didn't write this article during his Presidency ???
May 25, 2020 15:02:01 #
Kevyn wrote:
Full stop, dude, you've broken every rule in the book. You're as scatter brained as a monkey on amphetamines. Since when did moonbat l*****ts offer praise or show any respect for our military? The article in no way shows disgust for the military. Just the opposite, we allow the dishonor of our military by allowing bases to be named after defeated t*****rous enemies of the US the editorial simply suggests righting a wrong.
Any history professor worthy of the name would throw your sorry ass out of his class.
The Civil War occurred 160 years ago, 750,000 Americans lost their lives, more than in all other American wars from the American Revolution through the Korean War combined. The American population in 1860 was about 31 million people, about one-tenth the size it is today. If the war were fought today, the number of deaths would total 6.2 million.
Obviously much has changed since then. Today, the t*****rous enemy of America that must be defeated is the socialist progressive movement.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.