Seth

"Sputnik Zero" might have been a better handle for him than Airfarce1.

humunculero

All sides are guilt of gerrymandering and b****t harvesting and occasionally we get a case like this. However, results are going to show the GOP as exhibiting more corruption.

https://www.businessinsider.com/leaked-audio-trump-adviser-republicans-rely-v**er-suppression-justin-clark-2019-12

Seth

Business Insider has proven by its very consistency to be, "ballpark figure" about 100%, biased against Trump and Republicans to the same degree as CNN or MSNBC.

I have yet to see any of their articles that contradict that 100% figure.

Meanwhile, we see that all these minority district poll closings blamed on "Republican v**er suppression" seem to occur in districts wherein Democrats control polling place locations, etc.

Meanwhile, we see a Democrat state like California playing footloose with v****g methods, over 300 counties around the country with more v****g registered Democrats than there are people eligible to v**e, that e******n judge in Philadelphia who has confessed to taking money from Democrats to c***t to the tune of thousands of v**es.

Face it, today's Democratic Party has well demonstrated its disdain for the U.S. Constitution and its contempt for our American history and heritage as well as its essentially totalitarian and thoroughly intrusive attitude towards governance to the extent that it would be amazing, "flabbergastingly" so, if they did not have a problem with c***ting to get their politicians elected.

Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon

We should all address him as such😁

Seth

I'm for that!

PaulPisces Loc: San Francisco

Of course we all believe every v**e should be legal.
It's just that some do not see the need to stir up some cockamamie theory about something that, statistically, does not exist.

American Vet

You keep maintaining that stance even though you have been shown to be wrong.

But that aside, wouldn’t protecting the v**e be insuring that every person who tries to v**e has followed the law regarding registration, etc.? Would that also include proving that the v**er is who they claim to be?

PaulPisces Loc: San Francisco

You, and others here, have offered various examples of what may be v***r f***d. I have not had time to research their validity, but will try to do so.

In the meantime, I am inclined to believe the Brennan Center which, unlike most folks here, is non-partisan.

https://www.brennancenter.org/issues/ensure-every-american-can-v**e/v**e-suppression/myth-v**er-fraud

American Vet

And in the opening paragraphs, your link states “ But we must be careful not to undermine free and fair access to the b****t in the name of preventing phantom v***r f***d”.

How is insuring people who are registering to v**e are, in fact, eligible to v**e; following the laws regarding eligibility and maintaining those records; and requiring photo ID; in any way ‘undermining freedom and fair access’?

dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA

I prefer to not feed that Troll. However, I do like you moniker for him.

Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon

He's earned it.