maximus
Loc: Chattanooga, Tennessee
Hadenough wrote:
Maximus,
Great post, you obviously have done your due diligence. Now you will be attacked with insults and name calling because the dems/libs can’t refute your post. Especially when you got the information from their very credible liberal news media, lol.
Keep up the good work.
KAG
God Bless the USA and President Trump
Yeah...I know. It's OK though. It don't bother me a bit.
maximus
Loc: Chattanooga, Tennessee
ddavis wrote:
Allow the obvious to speak for itself, overk**l is a sure indication of a a weak case. Less is more.
You want facts and when I post facts I post too many?
maximus wrote:
You want facts and when I post facts I post too many?
Maximus,
What they can’t handle is your source, right from their Holy Grail. God forbid they attack cnn, after all if it came from cnn it’s definitely the t***h.
As Jack Webb used to say “just the facts mam”. You made a few heads explode.
KAG
God Bless the USA and President Trump
ddavis wrote:
Allow the obvious to speak for itself, overk**l is a sure indication of a a weak case. Less is more.
Maybe not you, but for many on the left it seems as if you can't give them enough evidence because they always demand more. Some have just gotten into the habit of putting as much information into their posts as possible. I try not to get too verbose, but if they want more I'll give them more. Name calling does not suffice for a counter argument, unless we are attempting to top each other's insults.
ddavis wrote:
Allow the obvious to speak for itself, overk**l is a sure indication of a a weak case. Less is more.
This one's got it bad and it's sore spot is glowing!
Kickaha wrote:
Maybe not you, but for many on the left it seems as if you can't give them enough evidence because they always demand more. Some have just gotten into the habit of putting as much information into their posts as possible. I try not to get too verbose, but if they want more I'll give them more. Name calling does not suffice for a counter argument, unless we are attempting to top each other's insults.
Wisdom... for sure. Some folks will argue with a tree, and just not recognize that the tree has got more going on than do they. Read and utilize Strunk and White, brevity always carries the day.
ddavis wrote:
Wisdom... for sure. Some folks will argue with a tree, and just not recognize that the tree has got more going on than do they. Read and utilize Strunk and White, brevity always carries the day.
Like Teddy Roosevelt said, speak softly and carry a big stick because that's the only way you'll get through some of those thick skulls.
maximus
Loc: Chattanooga, Tennessee
ddavis wrote:
Wisdom... for sure. Some folks will argue with a tree, and just not recognize that the tree has got more going on than do they. Read and utilize Strunk and White, brevity always carries the day.
When someone says something that I know to be false, it requires a preponderance of evidence to dispell it.
That all news outlets report the t***h, except for Fox, has been proven false with a preponderance of evidence.
Had I listed one or two cases, then it would have been said that anybody can make a mistake.
What's funny to me is the replys I got. There's no argument with what I posted, so instead I got;
Is that all you've got?
Aren't we a bit obsessive?
Aren't you a little trumpette?
What does CNN have to do with the Washington Post? (For one thing, both are anti Trump and PROVEN to lie).
But that's OK, cause' when I see these type of responses, I know the they have nothing left.
maximus wrote:
When someone says something that I know to be false, it requires a preponderance of evidence to dispell it.
That all news outlets report the t***h, except for Fox, has been proven false with a preponderance of evidence.
Had I listed one or two cases, then it would have been said that anybody can make a mistake.
What's funny to me is the replys I got. There's no argument with what I posted, so instead I got;
Is that all you've got?
Aren't we a bit obsessive?
Aren't you a little trumpette?
What does CNN have to do with the Washington Post? (For one thing, both are anti Trump and PROVEN to lie).
But that's OK, cause' when I see these type of responses, I know the they have nothing left.
When someone says something that I know to be fals... (
show quote)
Are you implying that trump is never wrong or that he speaks only the t***h? When one sees clearly a person, anyone, avoiding a direct response to a yes or no inquiry, even if they are free of guilt and guileless, do they not present an image of attempting to conceal a t***h? And that t***h being that they are at best being disingenuous? How’s that for some double speak? Every word written addressed the point but a bit of obfuscation concealed the bare gist. Following a line of reasoning becomes tedious and frankly not worth the effort. trump and his posse employ just such tactics routinely. It requires just a wee bit of discernment to see it.
Wolfman888 wrote:
As opposed to hiding your tax returns, right ?
You don't HIDE your tax returns.
It's against the law for the IRS to reveal your tax information
without a court order. So we will wait for that.
maximus
Loc: Chattanooga, Tennessee
ddavis wrote:
Are you implying that trump is never wrong or that he speaks only the t***h? When one sees clearly a person, anyone, avoiding a direct response to a yes or no inquiry, even if they are free of guilt and guileless, do they not present an image of attempting to conceal a t***h? And that t***h being that they are at best being disingenuous? How’s that for some double speak? Every word written addressed the point but a bit of obfuscation concealed the bare gist. Following a line of reasoning becomes tedious and frankly not worth the effort. trump and his posse employ just such tactics routinely. It requires just a wee bit of discernment to see it.
Are you implying that trump is never wrong or that... (
show quote)
Not at all. Kemmer said that all news is t***hful except for Fox. I demonstrated his statement to be false. Plus, I don't watch Fox.
maximus wrote:
I'm obsessive about facts. What do you do to prove your point?
Unfortunately the l*****t trolls here are uninterested as they wouldn't recognize t***h if it was a 2x4 smacking them in the face.
Navigator wrote:
Unfortunately the l*****t trolls here are uninterested as they wouldn't recognize t***h if it was a 2x4 smacking them in the face.
The conservative trolls are as original in their thought processes as catatonic minions spewing nonsense.
ddavis wrote:
The conservative trolls are as original in their thought processes as catatonic minions spewing nonsense.
You just identified yourself, t***sference is a mutha ain't it.
bilordinary wrote:
You just identified yourself, t***sference is a mutha ain't it.
I’m sorry, I didn’t catch that. It’s sort of difficult making out what the riff-raff in the cheap seats have to say.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.