Libs Are Disappointed People Aren't Dying!! (Page 2): Remember when both parties said it will be over when the 25 Trillion. And now they (the Dems) look at a $3 Trillion bill like it...

fullspinzoo

victor doherty wrote:

I 'm a dinosaur too I just refuse to grow up remember when republican used to care about the national debt.

Remember when both parties said it will be over when the 25 Trillion. And now they (the Dems) look at a $3 Trillion bill like it was nothing.

victor doherty

fullspinzoo wrote:

Remember when both parties said it will be over when the 25 Trillion. And now they (the Dems) look at a $3 Trillion bill like it was nothing.

ok this is what should have been done ,freeze the hole country down no rent no mortgage,1200 to 2400 a month for 1 yr,reevaluate going forward jobs ,infrastructure ,with the c*****e c****e we should rebuilding are water ways ,breaking up big monopolies like ,pharma (i'm tired of paying them with taxs dollars and them jacking up the cost )bust the big farms into co-op and put America back on track.!!

son of witless

greenmountaineer wrote:

Where do people get this sort of merde de vache? ... (show quote)

A ration stamp book and 1600 calories per day ? That is even worse than what we have today, and today sucks the teeny Obama.

promilitary

Kevyn wrote:

What the Trump administration is doing is trying to normalize the needless deaths of tens of thousands of Americans each month in a Hail Mary effort to put off his depression long enough to have a shot at ree******n.

See you've emptied your chamber pot again on us,Kev.

Rose42

promilitary wrote:

See you've emptied your chamber pot again on us,Kev.

victor doherty

promilitary wrote:

See you've emptied your chamber pot again on us,Kev.

you been drinking that orange-c**p-aid

promilitary

victor doherty wrote:

you been drinking that orange-c**p-aid

Your chamber pot too???
That's about all you have to offer, you and Kevy.

lindajoy Loc: right here with you....

fullspinzoo wrote:

Spot on ~ "the ends justify the means". Wh**ever it takes to get there". The best thing for someone dying is the chance to "v**e" several times in the next e******n. https://freedomwire.com/liberals-want-more-deaths/

Good morning hope you’re having a great day so far. The Libs want more deaths so they can continue to stand behind keeping our country close down. They also need more deaths to substantiate F***i claims which have always been wrong...

The t***h is yet again coming out against another s**m they escalated in order to try and Get Trump...they have no morals, no concern for country just their own agenda at all costs. People are starting to put the dots together and getting a very clear picture of these scumbags once again. And just how deep the deep state is.

New CDC Figures Show F***i’s Dishonest C****-** Projections Were Garbage

In case you hadn’t heard, Matt Margolis over at PJ Media is reporting that the CDC now estimates the case fatality rate (CFR) of C****-** to be only .4 percent. As Margolis points out, that’s much lower than the numbers used to frighten us into these lockdowns. But there are a few factors he doesn’t mention that demonstratively show we were unspeakably deceived rather than merely the victims of some disastrous but ultimately honest mistake.

The CFR is the death rate restricted to just those cases in which someone with symptoms had a test confirming they were infected. Since it factors in neither asymptomatic cases nor unconfirmed symptomatic ones, it’s going to substantially overstate the infection fatality rate (IFR), which is the rate among the totality of all those infected.

And, of course, it’s the IFR which represents the odds a random person who contracts the v***s has of dying. The CFR, on the other hand, isn’t really of any interest at if you’re just a normal person trying to understand how dire a threat we’re facing. It gets massively skewed by the over-representation of serious cases among those who get tested and because it doesn’t factor in asymptomatic infections at all.

Moreover, the skewing isn’t even uniform. Its extent depends upon the availability of tests and the polices in place concerning when they’re to be given. Both of which vary between different localities and even in the same one at different times.

The CDC is also now estimating that only 65% of those who contract the C****-** v***s actually wind up with any symptoms. That means the IFR will be at most 65% of the CFR since the latter is only counting symptomatic cases. That puts C****-**’s fatality rate at below .26%. But, given that testing has been relatively rare even among those who show symptoms, it’s bound to be substantially lower.

Margolis says that IFR will actually be .26%. But that calculation depends on assuming that everyone who caught the v***s and developed symptoms was tested, which is clearly not even close to true. The .26% figure he cites is, at best, an upper limit on the IFR, which is actually bound to be at least several times lower.
Keep reading plenty more ...

https://www.redstate.com/michael_thau/2020/05/23/842684/

bahmer

lindajoy wrote:

Good morning hope you’re having a great day so far. The Libs want more deaths so they can continue to stand behind keeping our country close down. They also need more deaths to substantiate F***i claims which have always been wrong...

The t***h is yet again coming out against another s**m they escalated in order to try and Get Trump...they have no morals, no concern for country just their own agenda at all costs. People are starting to put the dots together and getting a very clear picture of these scumbags once again. And just how deep the deep state is.

New CDC Figures Show F***i’s Dishonest C****-** Projections Were Garbage

In case you hadn’t heard, Matt Margolis over at PJ Media is reporting that the CDC now estimates the case fatality rate (CFR) of C****-** to be only .4 percent. As Margolis points out, that’s much lower than the numbers used to frighten us into these lockdowns. But there are a few factors he doesn’t mention that demonstratively show we were unspeakably deceived rather than merely the victims of some disastrous but ultimately honest mistake.

The CFR is the death rate restricted to just those cases in which someone with symptoms had a test confirming they were infected. Since it factors in neither asymptomatic cases nor unconfirmed symptomatic ones, it’s going to substantially overstate the infection fatality rate (IFR), which is the rate among the totality of all those infected.

And, of course, it’s the IFR which represents the odds a random person who contracts the v***s has of dying. The CFR, on the other hand, isn’t really of any interest at if you’re just a normal person trying to understand how dire a threat we’re facing. It gets massively skewed by the over-representation of serious cases among those who get tested and because it doesn’t factor in asymptomatic infections at all.

Moreover, the skewing isn’t even uniform. Its extent depends upon the availability of tests and the polices in place concerning when they’re to be given. Both of which vary between different localities and even in the same one at different times.

The CDC is also now estimating that only 65% of those who contract the C****-** v***s actually wind up with any symptoms. That means the IFR will be at most 65% of the CFR since the latter is only counting symptomatic cases. That puts C****-**’s fatality rate at below .26%. But, given that testing has been relatively rare even among those who show symptoms, it’s bound to be substantially lower.

Margolis says that IFR will actually be .26%. But that calculation depends on assuming that everyone who caught the v***s and developed symptoms was tested, which is clearly not even close to true. The .26% figure he cites is, at best, an upper limit on the IFR, which is actually bound to be at least several times lower.
Keep reading plenty more ...

https://www.redstate.com/michael_thau/2020/05/23/842684/

Good morning hope you’re having a great day so far... (show quote)

Amen and Amen

victor doherty

lindajoy wrote:

Good morning hope you’re having a great day so far. The Libs want more deaths so they can continue to stand behind keeping our country close down. They also need more deaths to substantiate F***i claims which have always been wrong...

The t***h is yet again coming out against another s**m they escalated in order to try and Get Trump...they have no morals, no concern for country just their own agenda at all costs. People are starting to put the dots together and getting a very clear picture of these scumbags once again. And just how deep the deep state is.

New CDC Figures Show F***i’s Dishonest C****-** Projections Were Garbage

In case you hadn’t heard, Matt Margolis over at PJ Media is reporting that the CDC now estimates the case fatality rate (CFR) of C****-** to be only .4 percent. As Margolis points out, that’s much lower than the numbers used to frighten us into these lockdowns. But there are a few factors he doesn’t mention that demonstratively show we were unspeakably deceived rather than merely the victims of some disastrous but ultimately honest mistake.

The CFR is the death rate restricted to just those cases in which someone with symptoms had a test confirming they were infected. Since it factors in neither asymptomatic cases nor unconfirmed symptomatic ones, it’s going to substantially overstate the infection fatality rate (IFR), which is the rate among the totality of all those infected.

And, of course, it’s the IFR which represents the odds a random person who contracts the v***s has of dying. The CFR, on the other hand, isn’t really of any interest at if you’re just a normal person trying to understand how dire a threat we’re facing. It gets massively skewed by the over-representation of serious cases among those who get tested and because it doesn’t factor in asymptomatic infections at all.

Moreover, the skewing isn’t even uniform. Its extent depends upon the availability of tests and the polices in place concerning when they’re to be given. Both of which vary between different localities and even in the same one at different times.

The CDC is also now estimating that only 65% of those who contract the C****-** v***s actually wind up with any symptoms. That means the IFR will be at most 65% of the CFR since the latter is only counting symptomatic cases. That puts C****-**’s fatality rate at below .26%. But, given that testing has been relatively rare even among those who show symptoms, it’s bound to be substantially lower.

Margolis says that IFR will actually be .26%. But that calculation depends on assuming that everyone who caught the v***s and developed symptoms was tested, which is clearly not even close to true. The .26% figure he cites is, at best, an upper limit on the IFR, which is actually bound to be at least several times lower.
Keep reading plenty more ...

https://www.redstate.com/michael_thau/2020/05/23/842684/

Good morning hope you’re having a great day so far... (show quote)

you gullibles just can't stop yourself with f**e news the orange joke drop the ball in fact the republican can't do anything right .The biggest problem is you never own your party crimes so ,in case you're not playing attention we dem don't mind wearing a mask you gullible remain in denial .

son of witless

victor doherty wrote:

you gullibles just can't stop yourself with f**e news the orange joke drop the ball in fact the republican can't do anything right .The biggest problem is you never own your party crimes so ,in case you're not playing attention we dem don't mind wearing a mask you gullible remain in denial .

It is not about wearing a mask, but you know that. It is about continuing the lock downs or not. Of course you know that too. With you, it is about misstating the questions, and posting irrelevant answers. Of course you know all of that also, but I love saying it.

lindajoy Loc: right here with you....

victor doherty wrote:

you gullibles just can't stop yourself with f**e news the orange joke drop the ball in fact the republican can't do anything right .The biggest problem is you never own your party crimes so ,in case you're not playing attention we dem don't mind wearing a mask you gullible remain in denial .

You obviously didn’t read the article or you have zero capability of comprehension. Masks weren’t the issue and I happen to wear mine when I go to the grocery store.

As far as gullibility you better take a damn good look in the mirror!

bahmer

lindajoy wrote:

You obviously didn’t read the article or you have zero capability of comprehension. Masks weren’t the issue and I happen to wear mine when I go to the grocery store.

As far as gullibility you better take a damn good look in the mirror!

I wear my mask pulled down under my nose because of COPD so that I can breath otherwise I would need to be resuscitated. The mask cuts off to much O2 for my needs.

lindajoy Loc: right here with you....

bahmer wrote:

I wear my mask pulled down under my nose because of COPD so that I can breath otherwise I would need to be resuscitated. The mask cuts off to much O2 for my needs.

That is your choice and medically necessary.. I thought of you during this early stage of v***s more than a few times..

Admittedly I will lift mine on occasion to get a better airflow as it does hinder breathing to a certain extent...

victor doherty

lindajoy wrote:

That is your choice and medically necessary.. I thought of you during this early stage of v***s more than a few times..

Admittedly I will lift mine on occasion to get a better airflow as it does hinder breathing to a certain extent...

you can run an air holes under your mask ,we should have lock down for a yr .