In a recent article, Tara Reades charge of sexual misconduct can not be trusted. The article listed seven points that makes this charge highly unlikely.
1. Tara Reade changed her allegation.
2. Her friend admitted to lying to investigating reporter.
3.All seventy four Biden staffers including sixty four women didn't know of any sexual misconduct by Biden.
4.Physical geography didn't line up with Reads claim. She claimed that she was assaulted under a stairway, but the assault location was actually a thoroughfare which is not a likely spot for such an assault.
5. The fundraiser claim that she was told to serve drinks was highly unlikely too be true, because it was a stated Biden's policy is not to ask young women to serve drinks.
6. Biden staffers remember that she was fired for cause.
7.Many people that know Reade do not trust her. She frequently lied to people. She often abused the goodwill of her landlord and neighbors. She takes advantage of good people, and finally is seen by many that know her to be a dishonest person.
This report was published in The National Interest by Jonathan chad. It is a somewhat long article and I encourage doubters to read the article which I have outlined. Check out Bing, Sexual misconduct allegations of Joe Biden. I investigated it because the allegations just didn't seem honest to me. There is no pattern of this conduct of Biden's past, with the exception of the touching of women by Biden. The women that mentioned this habit, said that it wasn't sexual in nature.
saltwind78 wrote:
In a recent article, Tara Reades charge of sexual misconduct can not be trusted. The article listed seven points that makes this charge highly unlikely.
1. Tara Reade changed her allegation.
2. Her friend admitted to lying to investigating reporter.
3.All seventy four Biden staffers including sixty four women didn't know of any sexual misconduct by Biden.
4.Physical geography didn't line up with Reads claim. She claimed that she was assaulted under a stairway, but the assault location was actually a thoroughfare which is not a likely spot for such an assault.
5. The fundraiser claim that she was told to serve drinks was highly unlikely too be true, because it was a stated Biden's policy is not to ask young women to serve drinks.
6. Biden staffers remember that she was fired for cause.
7.Many people that know Reade do not trust her. She frequently lied to people. She often abused the goodwill of her landlord and neighbors. She takes advantage of good people, and finally is seen by many that know her to be a dishonest person.
This report was published in The National Interest by Jonathan chad. It is a somewhat long article and I encourage doubters to read the article which I have outlined. Check out Bing, Sexual misconduct allegations of Joe Biden. I investigated it because the allegations just didn't seem honest to me. There is no pattern of this conduct of Biden's past, with the exception of the touching of women by Biden. The women that mentioned this habit, said that it wasn't sexual in nature.
In a recent article, Tara Reades charge of sexual ... (
show quote)
There is probably a connection to trump and his criminal gang that is funding her feeble claims
saltwind78 wrote:
In a recent article, Tara Reades charge of sexual misconduct can not be trusted. The article listed seven points that makes this charge highly unlikely.
1. Tara Reade changed her allegation.
2. Her friend admitted to lying to investigating reporter.
3.All seventy four Biden staffers including sixty four women didn't know of any sexual misconduct by Biden.
4.Physical geography didn't line up with Reads claim. She claimed that she was assaulted under a stairway, but the assault location was actually a thoroughfare which is not a likely spot for such an assault.
5. The fundraiser claim that she was told to serve drinks was highly unlikely too be true, because it was a stated Biden's policy is not to ask young women to serve drinks.
6. Biden staffers remember that she was fired for cause.
7.Many people that know Reade do not trust her. She frequently lied to people. She often abused the goodwill of her landlord and neighbors. She takes advantage of good people, and finally is seen by many that know her to be a dishonest person.
This report was published in The National Interest by Jonathan chad. It is a somewhat long article and I encourage doubters to read the article which I have outlined. Check out Bing, Sexual misconduct allegations of Joe Biden. I investigated it because the allegations just didn't seem honest to me. There is no pattern of this conduct of Biden's past, with the exception of the touching of women by Biden. The women that mentioned this habit, said that it wasn't sexual in nature.
In a recent article, Tara Reades charge of sexual ... (
show quote)
A blatant cover-up. Look how you people treated Kavanaugh ....can you say.."l*****t hypocrisy"?
saltwind78 wrote:
In a recent article, Tara Reades charge of sexual misconduct can not be trusted. The article listed seven points that makes this charge highly unlikely.
1. Tara Reade changed her allegation.
2. Her friend admitted to lying to investigating reporter.
3.All seventy four Biden staffers including sixty four women didn't know of any sexual misconduct by Biden.
4.Physical geography didn't line up with Reads claim. She claimed that she was assaulted under a stairway, but the assault location was actually a thoroughfare which is not a likely spot for such an assault.
5. The fundraiser claim that she was told to serve drinks was highly unlikely too be true, because it was a stated Biden's policy is not to ask young women to serve drinks.
6. Biden staffers remember that she was fired for cause.
7.Many people that know Reade do not trust her. She frequently lied to people. She often abused the goodwill of her landlord and neighbors. She takes advantage of good people, and finally is seen by many that know her to be a dishonest person.
This report was published in The National Interest by Jonathan chad. It is a somewhat long article and I encourage doubters to read the article which I have outlined. Check out Bing, Sexual misconduct allegations of Joe Biden. I investigated it because the allegations just didn't seem honest to me. There is no pattern of this conduct of Biden's past, with the exception of the touching of women by Biden. The women that mentioned this habit, said that it wasn't sexual in nature.
In a recent article, Tara Reades charge of sexual ... (
show quote)
How much were they all paid?
saltwind78 wrote:
In a recent article, Tara Reades charge of sexual misconduct can not be trusted. The article listed seven points that makes this charge highly unlikely.
1. Tara Reade changed her allegation.
2. Her friend admitted to lying to investigating reporter.
3.All seventy four Biden staffers including sixty four women didn't know of any sexual misconduct by Biden.
4.Physical geography didn't line up with Reads claim. She claimed that she was assaulted under a stairway, but the assault location was actually a thoroughfare which is not a likely spot for such an assault.
5. The fundraiser claim that she was told to serve drinks was highly unlikely too be true, because it was a stated Biden's policy is not to ask young women to serve drinks.
6. Biden staffers remember that she was fired for cause.
7.Many people that know Reade do not trust her. She frequently lied to people. She often abused the goodwill of her landlord and neighbors. She takes advantage of good people, and finally is seen by many that know her to be a dishonest person.
This report was published in The National Interest by Jonathan chad. It is a somewhat long article and I encourage doubters to read the article which I have outlined. Check out Bing, Sexual misconduct allegations of Joe Biden. I investigated it because the allegations just didn't seem honest to me. There is no pattern of this conduct of Biden's past, with the exception of the touching of women by Biden. The women that mentioned this habit, said that it wasn't sexual in nature.
In a recent article, Tara Reades charge of sexual ... (
show quote)
You keep proving how true blue you are. Thanks for removing all doubt. You have no firsthand knowledge of anything, just what you read and see from the leftwing controlled media. I always wondered why anti-freeze was blue or green. It mixes easier with the kool-aid your drinking. You must h**e being a winner. You keep h*****g with losers.
We've already defeated you. The only thing left is the slow walking and sad talking. Stick a fork in you guys, you are done. You remind me of a fish gasping for air. You need new lies we haven't heard before. It won't matter, your credibility is shot.
saltwind78 wrote:
In a recent article, Tara Reades charge of sexual misconduct can not be trusted. The article listed seven points that makes this charge highly unlikely.
1. Tara Reade changed her allegation.
2. Her friend admitted to lying to investigating reporter.
3.All seventy four Biden staffers including sixty four women didn't know of any sexual misconduct by Biden.
4.Physical geography didn't line up with Reads claim. She claimed that she was assaulted under a stairway, but the assault location was actually a thoroughfare which is not a likely spot for such an assault.
5. The fundraiser claim that she was told to serve drinks was highly unlikely too be true, because it was a stated Biden's policy is not to ask young women to serve drinks.
6. Biden staffers remember that she was fired for cause.
7.Many people that know Reade do not trust her. She frequently lied to people. She often abused the goodwill of her landlord and neighbors. She takes advantage of good people, and finally is seen by many that know her to be a dishonest person.
This report was published in The National Interest by Jonathan chad. It is a somewhat long article and I encourage doubters to read the article which I have outlined. Check out Bing, Sexual misconduct allegations of Joe Biden. I investigated it because the allegations just didn't seem honest to me. There is no pattern of this conduct of Biden's past, with the exception of the touching of women by Biden. The women that mentioned this habit, said that it wasn't sexual in nature.
In a recent article, Tara Reades charge of sexual ... (
show quote)
Exactly why I don't put stock in accusations until I see proof. Just the opposite of you hypocritical lefty's.
factnotfiction wrote:
There is probably a connection to trump and his criminal gang that is funding her feeble claims
Her claims seem stronger than the claims by Blasey-Ford against Mr. Kavanaugh, and yet you had no trouble believing her, or could I be mistaken and you di-int believe that one neither ?
son of witless wrote:
Her claims seem stronger than the claims by Blasey-Ford against Mr. Kavanaugh, and yet you had no trouble believing her, or could I be mistaken and you di-int believe that one neither ?
I do not believe any claim of mis- conduct that is over a reasonable period of time, like right after the alleged incident occurs. Anyone who takes more than 20 years to complain has a credibility problem as well they should
factnotfiction wrote:
I do not believe any claim of mis- conduct that is over a reasonable period of time, like right after the alleged incident occurs. Anyone who takes more than 20 years to complain has a credibility problem as well they should
I disagree with that. I believe someone can be traumatized by that type of encounter. Especially when women definitely were not viewed as equals in the work place and knew they wouldn't be believed. some rape victims even now do not come forward because they don't want their entire life on display. I didn't want Kavanaugh. I thought a more Conservative Judge more appropriate but I didn't believe Ford's accusations because her witness list fell apart and her husband basically said she's a bit of a whacko. Reade's accusations, seem more credible because of the people she told at the time, but I still could not v**e Biden guilty on the flimsy evidence I have seen at this point.
Peewee wrote:
You keep proving how true blue you are. Thanks for removing all doubt. You have no firsthand knowledge of anything, just what you read and see from the leftwing controlled media. I always wondered why anti-freeze was blue or green. It mixes easier with the kool-aid your drinking. You must h**e being a winner. You keep h*****g with losers.
We've already defeated you. The only thing left is the slow walking and sad talking. Stick a fork in you guys, you are done. You remind me of a fish gasping for air. You need new lies we haven't heard before. It won't matter, your credibility is shot.
You keep proving how true blue you are. Thanks for... (
show quote)
Peewee, I was curious about the claims against Biden. I don't know anything about this reporter. He did write that when he first heard the sexual misconduct claims against Biden, he believed them. I suggest that you check out the story before you accuse me of advancing " left wing " conspiracy theories. From my experience reading about the Trump supporters, it is they that make up conspiracy theories, and deny the t***h about Trump that should be obvious to any clear thinking person. Check out my posting of April 23.
son of witless wrote:
Her claims seem stronger than the claims by Blasey-Ford against Mr. Kavanaugh, and yet you had no trouble believing her, or could I be mistaken and you di-int believe that one neither ?
son, I have not been following the Kavanaugh case at all. But I certainly believe the sexual misconduct case against Clarence Thomas.
All this talk of Kavanaugh seems a diversion away from the elephant in the room, namely the 20 odd accusations made against the sitting President of rape and sexual assault starting from recent times back more than 20 years. Some of these seem to have more credibility that Tara Reade who comes across as a little scatterbrained, money and fame hungry and not a little dishonest but of course that does not prove she is lying in the Biden accusation without credible evidence.
However, on a balance of probabilities her accusation looks unlikely. There is no “locker room” Access Hollywood type tape of Biden boasting of serial sexual assault or evidence he paid off a Porn Star for silence over an encounter.
Even if Biden was guilty we are approaching a critical e******n where every move is being watched and analyzed and Republican strategists should know they are juggling with hand grenades if they go after Biden on this matter even through surrogates. The risk of fatal blowback could be terminal.
eden wrote:
All this talk of Kavanaugh seems a diversion away from the elephant in the room, namely the 20 odd accusations made against the sitting President of rape and sexual assault starting from recent times back more than 20 years. Some of these seem to have more credibility that Tara Reade who comes across as a little scatterbrained, money and fame hungry and not a little dishonest but of course that does not prove she is lying in the Biden accusation without evidence.
On a balance of probabilities however it looks
unlikely. There is no “locker room” Access Hollywood type tape of Biden boasting of serial sexual assault or evidence he paid off a Porn Star for silence over an encounter.
Even if Biden was guilty we are approaching a critical e******n where every move is being watched and analyzed and Republican strategists should know they are juggling with hand grenades if they go after Biden on this matter even through surrogates. The risk of fatal blowback could be terminal.
All this talk of Kavanaugh seems a diversion away ... (
show quote)
I agree. Usually there is a behavior pattern of past behavior in these kind of cases.
saltwind78 wrote:
I agree. Usually there is a behavior pattern of past behavior in these kind of cases.
Yet you didn’t believe Justice Thomas. A man with no sexual assault pattern of behavior.
saltwind78 wrote:
In a recent article, Tara Reades charge of sexual misconduct can not be trusted. The article listed seven points that makes this charge highly unlikely.
1. Tara Reade changed her allegation.
2. Her friend admitted to lying to investigating reporter.
3.All seventy four Biden staffers including sixty four women didn't know of any sexual misconduct by Biden.
4.Physical geography didn't line up with Reads claim. She claimed that she was assaulted under a stairway, but the assault location was actually a thoroughfare which is not a likely spot for such an assault.
5. The fundraiser claim that she was told to serve drinks was highly unlikely too be true, because it was a stated Biden's policy is not to ask young women to serve drinks.
6. Biden staffers remember that she was fired for cause.
7.Many people that know Reade do not trust her. She frequently lied to people. She often abused the goodwill of her landlord and neighbors. She takes advantage of good people, and finally is seen by many that know her to be a dishonest person.
This report was published in The National Interest by Jonathan chad. It is a somewhat long article and I encourage doubters to read the article which I have outlined. Check out Bing, Sexual misconduct allegations of Joe Biden. I investigated it because the allegations just didn't seem honest to me. There is no pattern of this conduct of Biden's past, with the exception of the touching of women by Biden. The women that mentioned this habit, said that it wasn't sexual in nature.
In a recent article, Tara Reades charge of sexual ... (
show quote)
When someone's story gets larger and more complex with every retelling.................................
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.