One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Greg Gutfeld on Biden response to Tara Reade claims: He 'was doing great in that interview until he confessed'
Page 1 of 2 next>
May 2, 2020 08:30:11   #
Parky60 Loc: People's Republic of Illinois
 
Greg Gutfeld on Biden response to Tara Reade claims: He 'was doing great in that interview until he confessed'
Victor Garcia ~ May 2, 2020
"The Five" weighed in Friday on presumptive Democratic p**********l nominee Joe Biden's response to allegations he sexually assaulted former staffer Tara Reade while serving in the Senate.

"I thought his tone was good. [MSNBC's] Mika [Brzezinski] was strong, but I don't know if he convinced anybody either way," co-host Jesse Watters said. "V**ers are just gonna have to never know the t***h and just factor this into their decision in November."

"He left himself vulnerable for sure. When Mika asked if he remembered Reade, he dodged," Watters added.

Watters also compared Biden's situation to the furor over sexual misconduct allegations against then-Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.

"His [Biden's] obvious 'Kavanaugh standard' about 'Believe all women' has evolved. It's now 'Believe all women at first, and then investigate them,'" Watters said. "Now a lot of people would think, investigate and then believe. I'm not really sure what he [Biden] believes. I just think he knows he needs to say what he needs to say to get out of that question."

Co-host Greg Gutfeld stated that Biden may have slipped up.

"Look, Biden was doing great in that interview until he confessed," Gutfeld said. "First he had the total denial. I think that was pretty good. The denial was pretty strong. And then he says as a complaint. 'You know, I don't know why all of a sudden 27 years 'this' gets raised.

"What is 'this?' What is 'this'? That's interesting," Gutfeld added.

Reply
May 2, 2020 09:02:52   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
Parky60 wrote:
Greg Gutfeld on Biden response to Tara Reade claims: He 'was doing great in that interview until he confessed'
Victor Garcia ~ May 2, 2020
"The Five" weighed in Friday on presumptive Democratic p**********l nominee Joe Biden's response to allegations he sexually assaulted former staffer Tara Reade while serving in the Senate.

"I thought his tone was good. [MSNBC's] Mika [Brzezinski] was strong, but I don't know if he convinced anybody either way," co-host Jesse Watters said. "V**ers are just gonna have to never know the t***h and just factor this into their decision in November."

"He left himself vulnerable for sure. When Mika asked if he remembered Reade, he dodged," Watters added.

Watters also compared Biden's situation to the furor over sexual misconduct allegations against then-Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.

"His [Biden's] obvious 'Kavanaugh standard' about 'Believe all women' has evolved. It's now 'Believe all women at first, and then investigate them,'" Watters said. "Now a lot of people would think, investigate and then believe. I'm not really sure what he [Biden] believes. I just think he knows he needs to say what he needs to say to get out of that question."

Co-host Greg Gutfeld stated that Biden may have slipped up.

"Look, Biden was doing great in that interview until he confessed," Gutfeld said. "First he had the total denial. I think that was pretty good. The denial was pretty strong. And then he says as a complaint. 'You know, I don't know why all of a sudden 27 years 'this' gets raised.

"What is 'this?' What is 'this'? That's interesting," Gutfeld added.
b Greg Gutfeld on Biden response to Tara Reade cl... (show quote)


"This" is the allegations of sexual misconduct... Which weren't brought up over the course of 27 years, and several p**********l runs....

Reply
May 2, 2020 09:09:05   #
Parky60 Loc: People's Republic of Illinois
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
"This" is the allegations of sexual misconduct... Which weren't brought up over the course of 27 years, and several p**********l runs....

You're so informative and astute.

Reply
 
 
May 2, 2020 09:13:18   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
Parky60 wrote:
You're so informative and astute.


Teachers are naturally drawn to certain types

Reply
May 2, 2020 10:05:53   #
Parky60 Loc: People's Republic of Illinois
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
Teachers are naturally drawn to certain types

You know what they say. Those who can...do. Those who can't...teach.

Reply
May 2, 2020 10:10:56   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
Parky60 wrote:
You know what they say. Those who can...do. Those who can't...teach.


Who are "they"?

Reply
May 2, 2020 11:33:53   #
Parky60 Loc: People's Republic of Illinois
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
Who are "they"?

George Bernard Shaw wrote that in his play Man and Superman. It is included as Maxim 36 in the Maxims for Revolutionists that is included in the work.

Shaw should be right up your alley canuckus. Shaw was involved in politics and the activities of the British intelligentsia, joining the Fabian Society in 1884, a socialist society having as its goal the establishment of a democratic socialist state in Great Britain.

Barack Obama is a Fabian socialist. Fabians believe in gradual nationalization of the economy through manipulation of the democratic process. Breaking away from the violent revolutionary socialists of the past, they think that the only real way to effect "fundamental change" and "social justice" is through a mass movement of the working classes presided over by intellectual and cultural elites.

In T.W. Arnold's The Folklore of Capitalism, Arnold teaches that we are to question everyone--our president, our pastor and our parents. Well, almost everyone. We’re not supposed to question the Fabian intellectuals themselves. That's the Fabian MO, relentless cultural and journalistic attacks on everything that is, and then a hard pitch for the hope of what might be.

This whole history lesson reminds me of you canuckus. You believe in democratic socialism.

Reply
 
 
May 2, 2020 16:09:37   #
grandaddyw Loc: FLORIDA
 
Parky60 wrote:
Greg Gutfeld on Biden response to Tara Reade claims: He 'was doing great in that interview until he confessed'
Victor Garcia ~ May 2, 2020
"The Five" weighed in Friday on presumptive Democratic p**********l nominee Joe Biden's response to allegations he sexually assaulted former staffer Tara Reade while serving in the Senate.

"I thought his tone was good. [MSNBC's] Mika [Brzezinski] was strong, but I don't know if he convinced anybody either way," co-host Jesse Watters said. "V**ers are just gonna have to never know the t***h and just factor this into their decision in November."

"He left himself vulnerable for sure. When Mika asked if he remembered Reade, he dodged," Watters added.

Watters also compared Biden's situation to the furor over sexual misconduct allegations against then-Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.

"His [Biden's] obvious 'Kavanaugh standard' about 'Believe all women' has evolved. It's now 'Believe all women at first, and then investigate them,'" Watters said. "Now a lot of people would think, investigate and then believe. I'm not really sure what he [Biden] believes. I just think he knows he needs to say what he needs to say to get out of that question."

Co-host Greg Gutfeld stated that Biden may have slipped up.

"Look, Biden was doing great in that interview until he confessed," Gutfeld said. "First he had the total denial. I think that was pretty good. The denial was pretty strong. And then he says as a complaint. 'You know, I don't know why all of a sudden 27 years 'this' gets raised.

"What is 'this?' What is 'this'? That's interesting," Gutfeld added.
b Greg Gutfeld on Biden response to Tara Reade cl... (show quote)


I do wonder why now, and what word would he have used if he was not guilty?

Reply
May 2, 2020 19:05:29   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
Parky60 wrote:
George Bernard Shaw wrote that in his play Man and Superman. It is included as Maxim 36 in the Maxims for Revolutionists that is included in the work.

Shaw should be right up your alley canuckus. Shaw was involved in politics and the activities of the British intelligentsia, joining the Fabian Society in 1884, a socialist society having as its goal the establishment of a democratic socialist state in Great Britain.

Barack Obama is a Fabian socialist. Fabians believe in gradual nationalization of the economy through manipulation of the democratic process. Breaking away from the violent revolutionary socialists of the past, they think that the only real way to effect "fundamental change" and "social justice" is through a mass movement of the working classes presided over by intellectual and cultural elites.

In T.W. Arnold's The Folklore of Capitalism, Arnold teaches that we are to question everyone--our president, our pastor and our parents. Well, almost everyone. We’re not supposed to question the Fabian intellectuals themselves. That's the Fabian MO, relentless cultural and journalistic attacks on everything that is, and then a hard pitch for the hope of what might be.

This whole history lesson reminds me of you canuckus. You believe in democratic socialism.
George Bernard Shaw wrote that in his play i Man ... (show quote)


Chuckle... ''Democratic socialism''... It's sad that you don't know what terms mean... I'm a free market capitalist (econimically) and a monarchist with limited democracy (politically)... Neither mesh well with democratic socialism....

Nota huge fan of Bernard Shaw.... But I like that you use quotes from him

Reply
May 2, 2020 21:36:54   #
Parky60 Loc: People's Republic of Illinois
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
Chuckle... ''Democratic socialism''... It's sad that you don't know what terms mean... I'm a free market capitalist (econimically) and a monarchist with limited democracy (politically)... Neither mesh well with democratic socialism....

Nota huge fan of Bernard Shaw.... But I like that you use quotes from him

Yet you support what you called Chines socialism. Have you ever heard of the term double-minded? It's biblical and describes you to a "T".

Reply
May 2, 2020 23:19:25   #
EmilyD
 
grandaddyw wrote:
I do wonder why now, and what word would he have used if he was not guilty?

He's probably calling her a 'lying dog faced pony soldier.'

(Did anyone ever figure out what he meant by that???)

Reply
 
 
May 2, 2020 23:28:50   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
Parky60 wrote:
Yet you support what you called Chines socialism. Have you ever heard of the term double-minded? It's biblical and describes you to a "T".


I don't support it... I accept it...

It's their nation...

Reply
May 3, 2020 05:57:37   #
Parky60 Loc: People's Republic of Illinois
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
I don't support it... I accept it...

It's their nation...

Definition of accept: To give admittance or approval to

And you said May 1, 2020 21:54:48
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
Not a c*******t Parky...

Have very little respect for the ideology...

But I'm good with "Chinese Socialism"...

In other words…

You’re ALRIGHT with "Chinese Socialism"...

You’re FINE with "Chinese Socialism"...

You’re OK with "Chinese Socialism"...

You SUPPORT "Chinese Socialism"...

Definition of support: To uphold or defend as valid or right

So, based on this one can only conclude that you not only approve of Chinese socialism, you uphold or defend it as valid or right.

Reply
May 3, 2020 06:05:38   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
Parky60 wrote:
In other words…

You’re ALRIGHT with "Chinese Socialism"...

You’re FINE with "Chinese Socialism"...

You’re OK with "Chinese Socialism"...

You SUPPORT "Chinese Socialism"...

Definition of support: To uphold or defend as valid or right

So, based on this one can only conclude that you not only approve of Chinese socialism, you uphold or defend it as valid or right.


I am alright with "Chinese socialism"...

I am fine with "Chinese socialism"...

I am ok with ''Chinese socialism''...

I do uphold and validate it as a form of government... That's what it is...

I support the right of China to have its own government...

I do not actively support "Chinese socialism".. Nor am I allowed to, t***h be told... As a foreigner I have no right to influence the government in any way... I support this as well...

If I were to become a Chinese citizen, I would be required to support the government (of course) which is one of the many reasons I have little interest in becoming a citizen...

I hope this clarifies my stance for you...

Reply
May 3, 2020 06:13:23   #
Parky60 Loc: People's Republic of Illinois
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
...I hope this clarifies my stance for you...

Yep...you're double-minded.

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.