eagleye13 wrote:
"Salty, get with the most recent research. For people aged 0 to 35, the annual flu is significantly more deadly than C****-**. For those aged 35-55 the flu and C****-** has about equal lethality. For those 55-65, C****-** is more deadly but not hugely so, while for those 65-75 C****-** is quite a bit more deadly while for those older than 75, both are pretty deadly. Now that you know all this, tell me again why you think it is a good idea to continue destroying our economy when the under 55 work force can go back to work tomorrow with no more risk than they usually have every year during the flu season, most hospitals are half full and laying off medical personnel and PPE is more than adequate everywhere?"
Yep! Today;, Americans can start doing what Americans do best.
WORK and produce!
"Salty, get with the most recent research. F... (
show quote)
The problem is not just with how contagious and deadly the v***s can be, but with how much technology, trained personnel and other expensive physical resources are needed to restore a sick person to health. It is clear that if ignored and tolerated,
treating only those with dangerous complications, much as we do with the flu, our medical system is inadequate to handle the sudden dramatic increase of extra, severely ill people, who though they cannot be cured immediately, do require and benefit from intense supportive medical care.
Once the healthcare system is overwhelmed by too many patients requiring a month of the highest degree of technical care and personal supervision in the ICU's, with additionally expensive infectious disease precautions (which must be rigidly adhered to with every contact) after spending a couple of weeks roaming about touching stuff and breathing in other peoples faces, (infected but asymptomatic,) the danger of massive increases in the death tolls result.
Not just from C***D **. From everything. Everything from heart attacks to funny breast lumps to an asthmatic child who starts breathing funny again are more deadly situations than before when the emergency room is packed with people with just sniffles(?) folks linger at home in doubt and fear of contagion instead of getting checked out at the ER or their doctors office. As has played out more fully in some other countries already.....
Until there is a fast effective treatment or a v*****e that eliminates the risk, people will keep catching this and a certain number who catch it will die of it, whether one person every day for a million days or a million people all on one day, the toll is the same by the end. We have shown we can slow its progress down with shutdowns and social distancing practices to just about the level our system can keep pace with and operate under. That is the extent to which we actually have some tenuous control for now.
The danger of contagion won't be over till the v***s can be cured or v******ted for. Since it cannot be stopped it will have to be managed. The guidelines for
reopening the economy are also the test, as the proof of the pudding is in the eating.
HOW we manage it with the opposing calamity being wrought upon the fabric of our lives and the economy is the question of the day! Incremental steps, wait and see, proceed or retreat intelligently based on results.
If, Then....
That is the plan we have.
I reckon we shall see how it goes. It is concerning that so many States and local authorities are not reading or implementing that first "if!" That being the consideration of decreasing restrictions based on having a flat or decreasing curve of new cases and deaths for two weeks, THEN.....