CV-19 and the Elephant in the room: Ok, let's set this up with the following statement (CD - if you're reading this - your input is desired): "For instance, on the Ontario government’s...

ACP45 Loc: Rhode Island

Ok, let's set this up with the following statement (CD - if you're reading this - your input is desired):

"For instance, on the Ontario government’s website telling its citizens what to do about C****-**, its advice consists entirely of measures designed to prevent people from coming in contact with the v***s: stay home, wash your hands often, don’t touch your face, maintain physical distancing and wear a mask when you have to go out.

No mention is made of any measures individuals can take to ensure their i****e s****ms are operating at peak efficiency (or as the French scientists would have put it, their terrain is well prepared to mount a defence). It’s almost as though the Ontario government doesn’t believe human beings have i****e s****ms or that they’re of any use whatsoever. The only hope, Ontario seems to believe, is for a pharmaceutical company to patent a v*****e, because that is the only way that human beings can defend themselves against a v***s, or acquire immunity."

Now, bear with me on this, the article from which this was taken goes into an interesting theoretical discussion of the 150-year-old scientific controversy between French scientist Louis Pasteur who is widely celebrated as “the father of germ theory”, and advocates of the lesser known “terrain theory” such as Antoine Béchamp.

The "terrain theorists" believed that the most important factor that determines whether or not a person becomes ill is not the presence of a germ, but rather the preparedness of the body’s internal environment (the “soil” or terrain) to repel or destroy the germ.

Now, what is the elephant in the room? Virtually all news media is focused on infection rate, mortality rate, social distancing, masks, V*****ES under development, overrun hospitals, etc., etc.

It is a well established fact that obese people, both young and old are at high risk. Smokers, high risk. People under stress, poor nutrition, people not getting enough sleep, people with high sugar and alcohol intake, all at high risk.

The point that I'm trying to make is that the focus on this disease relies upon Louis Pasteur's "germ theory" approach to this problem (even though Pasteur later wrote, “Bernard avait raison. Le germ n’est rien, c’est le terrain qui est tout.” (Bernard was right. The germ is nothing, it’s the soil that is everything.)

There are a few doctors, virologists and epidemiologists that have tried to focus on what individuals can and should be doing to maintain and strengthen their i****e s****m in order to prevent succumbing to the disease in the first place. That approach is the same as saying it's better to prevent getting cancer in the first place, rather than attempting to cure the disease once you have it.

You hear talk about the PCR tests that can determine whether you have CV-19, or an antibody test to determine if you had it and have developed antibodies. But, have you ever heard anybody suggesting checking the D3 level of people that have succumbed to the disease, vs. those that have had it, but are asymptomatic? How about checking on the Magnesium and Potassium levels of those same individuals.

Why is there no emphasis on the personal responsibility of each and every one of us maintain our gut health and to do all we can to keep our immunity level at optimum levels?
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2020/04/no_author/c****av***s-crisis-reopens-150-year-old-controversy/

Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall

ACP45 wrote:

Ok, let's set this up with the following statement (CD - if you're reading this - your input is desired):

"For instance, on the Ontario government’s website telling its citizens what to do about C****-**, its advice consists entirely of measures designed to prevent people from coming in contact with the v***s: stay home, wash your hands often, don’t touch your face, maintain physical distancing and wear a mask when you have to go out.

No mention is made of any measures individuals can take to ensure their i****e s****ms are operating at peak efficiency (or as the French scientists would have put it, their terrain is well prepared to mount a defence). It’s almost as though the Ontario government doesn’t believe human beings have i****e s****ms or that they’re of any use whatsoever. The only hope, Ontario seems to believe, is for a pharmaceutical company to patent a v*****e, because that is the only way that human beings can defend themselves against a v***s, or acquire immunity."

Now, bear with me on this, the article from which this was taken goes into an interesting theoretical discussion of the 150-year-old scientific controversy between French scientist Louis Pasteur who is widely celebrated as “the father of germ theory”, and advocates of the lesser known “terrain theory” such as Antoine Béchamp.

The "terrain theorists" believed that the most important factor that determines whether or not a person becomes ill is not the presence of a germ, but rather the preparedness of the body’s internal environment (the “soil” or terrain) to repel or destroy the germ.

Now, what is the elephant in the room? Virtually all news media is focused on infection rate, mortality rate, social distancing, masks, V*****ES under development, overrun hospitals, etc., etc.

It is a well established fact that obese people, both young and old are at high risk. Smokers, high risk. People under stress, poor nutrition, people not getting enough sleep, people with high sugar and alcohol intake, all at high risk.

The point that I'm trying to make is that the focus on this disease relies upon Louis Pasteur's "germ theory" approach to this problem (even though Pasteur later wrote, “Bernard avait raison. Le germ n’est rien, c’est le terrain qui est tout.” (Bernard was right. The germ is nothing, it’s the soil that is everything.)

There are a few doctors, virologists and epidemiologists that have tried to focus on what individuals can and should be doing to maintain and strengthen their i****e s****m in order to prevent succumbing to the disease in the first place. That approach is the same as saying it's better to prevent getting cancer in the first place, rather than attempting to cure the disease once you have it.

You hear talk about the PCR tests that can determine whether you have CV-19, or an antibody test to determine if you had it and have developed antibodies. But, have you ever heard anybody suggesting checking the D3 level of people that have succumbed to the disease, vs. those that have had it, but are asymptomatic? How about checking on the Magnesium and Potassium levels of those same individuals.

Why is there no emphasis on the personal responsibility of each and every one of us maintain our gut health and to do all we can to keep our immunity level at optimum levels?
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2020/04/no_author/c****av***s-crisis-reopens-150-year-old-controversy/

Ok, let's set this up with the following statement... (show quote)

It's rare that individuals will take initiative to change their habits...

I agree with the article though... Health begins with the choices we make concerning our bodies...

RT friend Loc: Kangaroo valley NSW Australia

ACP45 wrote:

Ok, let's set this up with the following statement (CD - if you're reading this - your input is desired):

"For instance, on the Ontario government’s website telling its citizens what to do about C****-**, its advice consists entirely of measures designed to prevent people from coming in contact with the v***s: stay home, wash your hands often, don’t touch your face, maintain physical distancing and wear a mask when you have to go out.

No mention is made of any measures individuals can take to ensure their i****e s****ms are operating at peak efficiency (or as the French scientists would have put it, their terrain is well prepared to mount a defence). It’s almost as though the Ontario government doesn’t believe human beings have i****e s****ms or that they’re of any use whatsoever. The only hope, Ontario seems to believe, is for a pharmaceutical company to patent a v*****e, because that is the only way that human beings can defend themselves against a v***s, or acquire immunity."

Now, bear with me on this, the article from which this was taken goes into an interesting theoretical discussion of the 150-year-old scientific controversy between French scientist Louis Pasteur who is widely celebrated as “the father of germ theory”, and advocates of the lesser known “terrain theory” such as Antoine Béchamp.

The "terrain theorists" believed that the most important factor that determines whether or not a person becomes ill is not the presence of a germ, but rather the preparedness of the body’s internal environment (the “soil” or terrain) to repel or destroy the germ.

Now, what is the elephant in the room? Virtually all news media is focused on infection rate, mortality rate, social distancing, masks, V*****ES under development, overrun hospitals, etc., etc.

It is a well established fact that obese people, both young and old are at high risk. Smokers, high risk. People under stress, poor nutrition, people not getting enough sleep, people with high sugar and alcohol intake, all at high risk.

The point that I'm trying to make is that the focus on this disease relies upon Louis Pasteur's "germ theory" approach to this problem (even though Pasteur later wrote, “Bernard avait raison. Le germ n’est rien, c’est le terrain qui est tout.” (Bernard was right. The germ is nothing, it’s the soil that is everything.)

There are a few doctors, virologists and epidemiologists that have tried to focus on what individuals can and should be doing to maintain and strengthen their i****e s****m in order to prevent succumbing to the disease in the first place. That approach is the same as saying it's better to prevent getting cancer in the first place, rather than attempting to cure the disease once you have it.

You hear talk about the PCR tests that can determine whether you have CV-19, or an antibody test to determine if you had it and have developed antibodies. But, have you ever heard anybody suggesting checking the D3 level of people that have succumbed to the disease, vs. those that have had it, but are asymptomatic? How about checking on the Magnesium and Potassium levels of those same individuals.

Why is there no emphasis on the personal responsibility of each and every one of us maintain our gut health and to do all we can to keep our immunity level at optimum levels?
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2020/04/no_author/c****av***s-crisis-reopens-150-year-old-controversy/

Ok, let's set this up with the following statement... (show quote)

Diabetics and anyone with even the slightest breathing condition is at risk no matter how old they are.

ACP45 Loc: Rhode Island

Canuckus Deploracus wrote:

It's rare that individuals will take initiative to change their habits...

I agree with the article though... Health begins with the choices we make concerning our bodies...

I guess that's why they call it personal responsibility, and why you don't hear much emphasis being placed upon it. Not a very popular concept nowadays.

ACP45 Loc: Rhode Island

RT friend wrote:

Diabetics and anyone with even the slightest breathing condition is at risk no matter how old they are.

Too bad our government (NIH, CDC, FDA - you get the picture) would not want to run a study of Diabetics who have a high level of vitamin D, Magnesium, Potassium, and Zinc against a control group with low levels of those nutrients, and see what effect, if any that would have on the t***smissibility and mortality rate. That might be something Diabetics would want to know.

PZG1225 Loc: Florida

ACP45 wrote:

Ok, let's set this up with the following statement (CD - if you're reading this - your input is desired):

"For instance, on the Ontario government’s website telling its citizens what to do about C****-**, its advice consists entirely of measures designed to prevent people from coming in contact with the v***s: stay home, wash your hands often, don’t touch your face, maintain physical distancing and wear a mask when you have to go out.

No mention is made of any measures individuals can take to ensure their i****e s****ms are operating at peak efficiency (or as the French scientists would have put it, their terrain is well prepared to mount a defence). It’s almost as though the Ontario government doesn’t believe human beings have i****e s****ms or that they’re of any use whatsoever. The only hope, Ontario seems to believe, is for a pharmaceutical company to patent a v*****e, because that is the only way that human beings can defend themselves against a v***s, or acquire immunity."

Now, bear with me on this, the article from which this was taken goes into an interesting theoretical discussion of the 150-year-old scientific controversy between French scientist Louis Pasteur who is widely celebrated as “the father of germ theory”, and advocates of the lesser known “terrain theory” such as Antoine Béchamp.

The "terrain theorists" believed that the most important factor that determines whether or not a person becomes ill is not the presence of a germ, but rather the preparedness of the body’s internal environment (the “soil” or terrain) to repel or destroy the germ.

Now, what is the elephant in the room? Virtually all news media is focused on infection rate, mortality rate, social distancing, masks, V*****ES under development, overrun hospitals, etc., etc.

It is a well established fact that obese people, both young and old are at high risk. Smokers, high risk. People under stress, poor nutrition, people not getting enough sleep, people with high sugar and alcohol intake, all at high risk.

The point that I'm trying to make is that the focus on this disease relies upon Louis Pasteur's "germ theory" approach to this problem (even though Pasteur later wrote, “Bernard avait raison. Le germ n’est rien, c’est le terrain qui est tout.” (Bernard was right. The germ is nothing, it’s the soil that is everything.)

There are a few doctors, virologists and epidemiologists that have tried to focus on what individuals can and should be doing to maintain and strengthen their i****e s****m in order to prevent succumbing to the disease in the first place. That approach is the same as saying it's better to prevent getting cancer in the first place, rather than attempting to cure the disease once you have it.

You hear talk about the PCR tests that can determine whether you have CV-19, or an antibody test to determine if you had it and have developed antibodies. But, have you ever heard anybody suggesting checking the D3 level of people that have succumbed to the disease, vs. those that have had it, but are asymptomatic? How about checking on the Magnesium and Potassium levels of those same individuals.

Why is there no emphasis on the personal responsibility of each and every one of us maintain our gut health and to do all we can to keep our immunity level at optimum levels?
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2020/04/no_author/c****av***s-crisis-reopens-150-year-old-controversy/

Ok, let's set this up with the following statement... (show quote)

I've thought this from the beginning....excellent article ACP!

permafrost Loc: Minnesota

ACP45 wrote:

Ok, let's set this up with the following statement (CD - if you're reading this - your input is desired):

"For instance, on the Ontario government’s website telling its citizens what to do about C****-**, its advice consists entirely of measures designed to prevent people from coming in contact with the v***s: stay home, wash your hands often, don’t touch your face, maintain physical distancing and wear a mask when you have to go out.

No mention is made of any measures individuals can take to ensure their i****e s****ms are operating at peak efficiency (or as the French scientists would have put it, their terrain is well prepared to mount a defence). It’s almost as though the Ontario government doesn’t believe human beings have i****e s****ms or that they’re of any use whatsoever. The only hope, Ontario seems to believe, is for a pharmaceutical company to patent a v*****e, because that is the only way that human beings can defend themselves against a v***s, or acquire immunity."

Now, bear with me on this, the article from which this was taken goes into an interesting theoretical discussion of the 150-year-old scientific controversy between French scientist Louis Pasteur who is widely celebrated as “the father of germ theory”, and advocates of the lesser known “terrain theory” such as Antoine Béchamp.

The "terrain theorists" believed that the most important factor that determines whether or not a person becomes ill is not the presence of a germ, but rather the preparedness of the body’s internal environment (the “soil” or terrain) to repel or destroy the germ.

Now, what is the elephant in the room? Virtually all news media is focused on infection rate, mortality rate, social distancing, masks, V*****ES under development, overrun hospitals, etc., etc.

It is a well established fact that obese people, both young and old are at high risk. Smokers, high risk. People under stress, poor nutrition, people not getting enough sleep, people with high sugar and alcohol intake, all at high risk.

The point that I'm trying to make is that the focus on this disease relies upon Louis Pasteur's "germ theory" approach to this problem (even though Pasteur later wrote, “Bernard avait raison. Le germ n’est rien, c’est le terrain qui est tout.” (Bernard was right. The germ is nothing, it’s the soil that is everything.)

There are a few doctors, virologists and epidemiologists that have tried to focus on what individuals can and should be doing to maintain and strengthen their i****e s****m in order to prevent succumbing to the disease in the first place. That approach is the same as saying it's better to prevent getting cancer in the first place, rather than attempting to cure the disease once you have it.

You hear talk about the PCR tests that can determine whether you have CV-19, or an antibody test to determine if you had it and have developed antibodies. But, have you ever heard anybody suggesting checking the D3 level of people that have succumbed to the disease, vs. those that have had it, but are asymptomatic? How about checking on the Magnesium and Potassium levels of those same individuals.

Why is there no emphasis on the personal responsibility of each and every one of us maintain our gut health and to do all we can to keep our immunity level at optimum levels?
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2020/04/no_author/c****av***s-crisis-reopens-150-year-old-controversy/

Ok, let's set this up with the following statement... (show quote)

ACP.... good morning... I am all for healthy living and building up a persons i****e s****m.. good thing to do..

However, why would you think, as seems to be the case, that some latent resistance to a v***s exists when the v***s is new to mankind? Nothing in our systems that has experienced this illness at any time in the past.. Stay with recommendations.. people want you to remain with OPP..

RT friend Loc: Kangaroo valley NSW Australia

ACP45 wrote:

Too bad our government (NIH, CDC, FDA - you get the picture) would not want to run a study of Diabetics who have a high level of vitamin D, Magnesium, Potassium, and Zinc against a control group with low levels of those nutrients, and see what effect, if any that would have on the t***smissibility and mortality rate. That might be something Diabetics would want to know.

All those Gov Departments are likely working closely with Big Pharma who has been captured by the political enablers of Wall Street, to quote "THE NEW REPUBLIC" Magazine - 'How Big Phama Was Captured by the One Percent '.

Your righ about the minerals and vitamins, another thing for sure to take note of is anyone who is getting on a bit, say late 60's, should not make up for fading energy by increasing caffeine consumption.

If you do over a few years, even though you feel fit as a fiddle are not over weight and don't have suggar in tea you are bringing on Diabetes type 2 .

no propaganda please Loc: moon orbiting the third rock from the sun

Canuckus Deploracus wrote:

It's rare that individuals will take initiative to change their habits...

I agree with the article though... Health begins with the choices we make concerning our bodies...

Unfortunately the one thing we have going against us can't be changed. We are both in our late 70's.

What we can do is live to the fullest and keep our faith in OUR LORD. The rest is up to HIM.

SWMBO and NPP

Cuda2020

ACP45 wrote:

Ok, let's set this up with the following statement (CD - if you're reading this - your input is desired):

"For instance, on the Ontario government’s website telling its citizens what to do about C****-**, its advice consists entirely of measures designed to prevent people from coming in contact with the v***s: stay home, wash your hands often, don’t touch your face, maintain physical distancing and wear a mask when you have to go out.

No mention is made of any measures individuals can take to ensure their i****e s****ms are operating at peak efficiency (or as the French scientists would have put it, their terrain is well prepared to mount a defence). It’s almost as though the Ontario government doesn’t believe human beings have i****e s****ms or that they’re of any use whatsoever. The only hope, Ontario seems to believe, is for a pharmaceutical company to patent a v*****e, because that is the only way that human beings can defend themselves against a v***s, or acquire immunity."

Now, bear with me on this, the article from which this was taken goes into an interesting theoretical discussion of the 150-year-old scientific controversy between French scientist Louis Pasteur who is widely celebrated as “the father of germ theory”, and advocates of the lesser known “terrain theory” such as Antoine Béchamp.

The "terrain theorists" believed that the most important factor that determines whether or not a person becomes ill is not the presence of a germ, but rather the preparedness of the body’s internal environment (the “soil” or terrain) to repel or destroy the germ.

Now, what is the elephant in the room? Virtually all news media is focused on infection rate, mortality rate, social distancing, masks, V*****ES under development, overrun hospitals, etc., etc.

It is a well established fact that obese people, both young and old are at high risk. Smokers, high risk. People under stress, poor nutrition, people not getting enough sleep, people with high sugar and alcohol intake, all at high risk.

The point that I'm trying to make is that the focus on this disease relies upon Louis Pasteur's "germ theory" approach to this problem (even though Pasteur later wrote, “Bernard avait raison. Le germ n’est rien, c’est le terrain qui est tout.” (Bernard was right. The germ is nothing, it’s the soil that is everything.)

There are a few doctors, virologists and epidemiologists that have tried to focus on what individuals can and should be doing to maintain and strengthen their i****e s****m in order to prevent succumbing to the disease in the first place. That approach is the same as saying it's better to prevent getting cancer in the first place, rather than attempting to cure the disease once you have it.

You hear talk about the PCR tests that can determine whether you have CV-19, or an antibody test to determine if you had it and have developed antibodies. But, have you ever heard anybody suggesting checking the D3 level of people that have succumbed to the disease, vs. those that have had it, but are asymptomatic? How about checking on the Magnesium and Potassium levels of those same individuals.

Why is there no emphasis on the personal responsibility of each and every one of us maintain our gut health and to do all we can to keep our immunity level at optimum levels?
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2020/04/no_author/c****av***s-crisis-reopens-150-year-old-controversy/

Ok, let's set this up with the following statement... (show quote)

Excellent point and I've thought the same, thanks for posting it. May I suggest a low sugar diet foremost, onion, garlic, bone broth, zinc, and good probiotic foods such as sauerkraut, and apple cider vinegar. Stay healthy folks.

Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall

no propaganda please wrote:

Unfortunately the one thing we have going against us can't be changed. We are both in our late 70's.

What we can do is live to the fullest and keep our faith in OUR LORD. The rest is up to HIM.

SWMBO and NPP

Amen...

Cuda2020

RT friend wrote:

All those Gov Departments are likely working clos... (show quote)

Don't understand that last sentence, how does not being overweight or not having sugar in your tea bring on diabetes 2? Those two things help prevent diabetes.

RT friend Loc: Kangaroo valley NSW Australia

Barracuda2020 wrote:

Don't understand that last sentence, how does not being overweight or not having sugar in your tea bring on diabetes 2? Those two things help prevent diabetes.

I'm no expert but my internet doctor told me being overweight and high sugar consumption causes a very high chance of becoming type 2 diabetes affected, due to your body's metabolism, NOT by causing low levels of insulin being created by the pancreas that's type 1. type 2. is called insulin deficiency, type 2 diabetes means there is a resistance to insulin so insulin can't be used correctly and the pancreas produces less insulin as a result, I think until type 2. diabetes cannot become type 1 diabetes, but I'm not sure about that.

Type 1 , diabetes people are seriously ill, it cannot be Prevented.
Type 2, diabetes can be Prevented or delayed with a healthy life style HEALTHY WEIGHT, EATING SENSIBLY, and EXERCISING REGULARLY.

Type 2. diabetes can cause blindness and kidney failure, stroke, foot or leg amputations.

I think too much exercise using caffeine as a stimulant can cause diabetes in older people.

A******l levels of the hormone insulin in blood is called hyperinsulinism causing a rise in blood glucose levels, this is in infants and I think is similar to type 1. except it's too much instead of too little, it is treated by removing part of the pancreas in babies.

I think both diabetes affects organs, but I do know type 2 diabetes means insulin is NOT deficient or being over produced by the pancreas at first that's diabetes type 1, type 2 means the insulin is not working properly because of insulin resistance, so type 1 requires insulin injections and type 2 means your cells can't use the glucose produced by insulin in your metabolism as there is a metabolic resistance because the glucose goes straight into the blood, so blood sugar levels rise which I think is improper metabolism, and weight gain becomes excessive, having sugar in tea makes it much worse because the sugar goes straight into the blood exacerbating the problem and using caffeine to produce mental awareness is not really creating energy levels but you mistakenly think it is because you feel good, in old people this is a problem, because it causes too much of a shake up in metabolism.

It's all about metabolism baby, I might have to quit exercises.

ACP45 Loc: Rhode Island

permafrost wrote:

ACP.... good morning... I am all for healthy living and building up a persons i****e s****m.. good thing to do..

However, why would you think, as seems to be the case, that some latent resistance to a v***s exists when the v***s is new to mankind? Nothing in our systems that has experienced this illness at any time in the past.. Stay with recommendations.. people want you to remain with OPP..

Hey there Permafrost,
While I don't know this for a fact, I assume that C****-** was preceeded by C***d-1 thru 18. The fact is that C****-** is a C****a v***s which is pretty common, like a cold v***s. Mankind has been dealing with all kind of v***s's probably since the beginning of time. The jury is still out on whether this was a lab created v***s, or simply occured thru natural processes. The human body and it's i****e s****m is a pretty amazing creation. I'm not saying that mankind is impervious to every v***s either natural or man made, but we have survived this long, so I feel our chances are pretty good as long as we do our part and give our body all the tools it needs to do the job it was designed to do. BTW, love your Willie Nelson pic.

Big Dolly

I definitely agree. When I was placed on SSI, MediCal (or rather "MediQuack") and Medicare (I. e. "MediCareless), my health so totally trashed by the latter two programs that I knew I had to take matters into my own hands. For example, I learned that chili peppers and products made from them (hot sauce, etc.) are natural lymphatic cleansers. The lymphatic system is the circulatory part of your i****e s****m. Lymph vessels run alongside blood vessels throughout the whole body. That's why it's important to keep it clean, strong and healthy. Will capsaicin (the heat in chilies) keep you from getting that c****av***s? Not likely, but it will make it harder for that v***s to get a hold on you.