Abel

Isn't that amazing? With all the lack of memory one could say she was senile.

However, IMHO, that's not really the case. She and Bill have more than earned, and deserve, the their titles, The Teflon woman and Slick Willy. She wrote her college paper on C*******m and its benefits, and she is a top level C*******t in the Deep State Establishment New World Order promoters. Bill is a Rhodes Scholar, which implies he is also a C*******t, since Cecil Rhodes started his scholarships to search for, find, and train top level C*******t operatives. Want a good rundown on the Clinton Administration, read "Unlimited Access" by Aldrich.

Since C*******ts don't believe in the Bible, swearing an oath on a Bible means nothing to her, so being "under oath" has no meaning when she testifies under oath. For all the crimes they have committed against the USA and US Citizens, they should spend the rest of their natural lives in isolated Federal prison cells. They are bad people.

Lonewolf

O if only could prove it

bggamers Loc: georgia

I'm confused did you just condemn millions of people because they don't agree with you for your information conservative want to preserve the American way want to protect the bill of rights and the constitution. Whereas the Democrats are going out of their way to go against all these things with the bills they pass in their states and there continued overboard harassment of the president. Perhaps if you did some reading and investigate what conservatives are for u may get a different opinion listening to propaganda meds will not keep u informed but disinformed

Boy from the Bronx

You are using the old McCarthy tactic of guilt by association.

Just because Hillary Clinton supposedly wrote a college paper on "C*******m and its benefits," it doesn't mean that she still has a positive view of C*******m. People can change their minds, you know.

Back in the 1930s, a lot of Americans joined the C*******t Party because they felt that with Capitalism seemingly destroyed by the Great Depression, C*******m might be a better alternative. At the time, the C*******t Party seemed to be the only political group willing to back some of the worthiest causes, like the labor movement, racial e******y, the fight against F*****m, etc, whereas both the Democratic and Republican Parties ignored these issues because they were considered too "controversial." Plus many C*******t "front" organizations claimed to champion these causes and carried noble sounding words like "American," "Democratic," "Freedom," and "Peace" in their titles, so that many idealistic liberals and Progressives were tricked into joining. However, many of them changed their minds when they found out the true intentions of these groups, not to mention the revelations of Josef Stalin's tyranny over the Russian people, plus the infamous 1939 "Pact of Non-aggression" between the Soviet Union and N**i Germany (which the "Reds" claimed to be against), which led to Stalin openly praising Adolf Hitler, which disillusioned the naive Progressives and liberals even further!

The point is that just because these people originally supported C*******m, it doesn't necessarily mean that they continued to support it. Ironically, their mistakes came back to haunt them a couple of decades later, when their flirtations with "Red" causes led to their being blacklisted during the McCarthy Era.

As for Bill Clinton being a Rhodes scholar, and Cecil Rhodes wanting to use the scholarship that bears his name to recruit people for the C*******t cause, you should know that a lot of people have been Rhodes scholars and yet, did NOT become members of the C*******t Party, or do anything that would have aided the cause of C*******m. Maybe it was the same way with Bill Clinton, that is, he didn't automatically turn into a "C****e," despite his Rhodes scholarship.

Again, mere association doesn't always prove guilt.

Boy from the Bronx

You're taking my words out of context, which is something else you right-wingers are notorious for!

I did NOT "condemn millions of people" because they disagree with me! I was merely condemning "iFrank" for accusing another commentator of not being "for our heritage" just because he disagreed with the way iFrank was making wild accusations against Barack Obama and the Clintons without any evidence to back them up.
It was like he was accusing that other fellow of being unpatriotic and Un-American for not holding the same beliefs as him.

In other words, I wasn't denouncing people for having their own opinions, I was doing just the opposite! I was DEFENDING the right to disagree, to voice dissenting opinions without being labeled as "t*****rs," or "subversives," or in iFrank's case, without being accused of not being "for our heritage."

I was also questioning iFrank's remark about how "God h**ed Esau." I was asking him what that has to do with someone differing with him about the Clintons and Obama.

You say the conservatives want to preserve "the American way," that they believe in the United States Constitution and the Bill of Rights. If that's the case, how do you explain the fact that the conservatives have been among the worst VIOLATERS of the Constitution? Just look at their record:

It was the conservative Puritans of New England who condemned innocent people as "witches" after trials that couldn't possibly be considered fair.

It was the conservative Know Nothing Party that trampled on the rights of people they h**ed, like b****s, foreigners, and Catholics (ESPECIALLY CATHOLICS).

It was the conservative white people of the South who supported s***ery, and continued to ignore the rights of black people even after s***ery was banned in the United States. They did this through segregation, through the Black Codes, by denying b****s the right to v**e (a right guaranteed to them by the 15th Amendment) via the Poll Tax, the Grandfather Clause, the r****d literacy test, and other dirty tricks. It was these same Southern white conservatives who started the Ku Klux Klan, who really went to work on the rights of the ex-s***es!

Furthermore, the conservatives not only deprived the black people of their constitutional rights, they deprived other minorities of their rights as well: Hispanics, Catholics, Jews, women, gays, Native Americans (the Indians), Asians, etc.

Where were these conservative defenders of the Constitution and the Bill Of Rights when innocent people were convicted of crimes they didn't commit because their rights were ignored? In other words, people like Sacco and Vanzetti, the Scotsboro Boys, Bruno Richard Hauptmann (the supposed Lindbergh kidnapper), Caryl Chessman, Dr. Sam Sheppard, George Whitmore, the Wilmington Ten, etc.

And what about the Central Park Five, a group of two black youths and three Hispanic youths who convicted of raping a white woman in New York City's Central Park, but were proven innocent years later? Many people blame their unjust convictions on an inflammatory and prejudicial full-page ad in the New York Times newspaper that practically declared the boys to be guilty before they were even brought to trial, and even demanded their execution! This ad definitely poisoned the minds of anyone who read it, including people who may have been on the jury that convicted the five youths.

Incidentally, even though the Central Park Five were cleared of all charges, the man who possibly contributed to their wrongful convictions and punishments by placing that biased ad in the Times has NEVER apologized for what he did to them, has never acknowledged that he was wrong about them, that he had done them a grave injustice. His name: DONALD TRUMP!!!

It was the conservative establishment of the 1950s who supported the McCarthy blacklist, which led to thousands of innocent people being labeled as C*******ts and losing their jobs, often without any right of reply, or even the right to confront their accusers to prove that they were lying or mistaken. This same establishment also didn't mind when the FBI and the CIA were illegally spying on people they thought were "subversives," or were harassing legitimate dissidents, like J. Edgar Hoover's personal wars against the Civil Rights movement and the Anti-Vietnam War campaign, or were simply invading the privacy of people who weren't accused, or even suspected, of commiting a crime. And let's not forget about the conservatives' support of President Richard Nixon, even after the revelations of his involvement in the Watergate scandal, which included wiretapping the phones of Nixon's opponents, whose names he had written on his "Enemies list."

Another thing: you modern day conservatives are denying other people of their rights, like for example, trying to take away a woman's right to decide what to do with her own body, or robbing mostly people of color of their right to v**e through minor details, like the supposed misuse of hyphens, or not having a "permanent address," which effects Native Americans who live on reservations, where there are no real streets, and thus no real addresses (most of them have to get their mail through a post office box).

And what about your contempt for organizations that fight for the constitutional rights of individuals, like the N.A.A.C.P., or the National Organization for Women, or the Gay Rights groups, or especially, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)?

And yet, you expect everyone to believe that you conservatives believe in the American way, that you support the U.S. Constitution and the Bill Of Rights?

IN A PIG'S EYE, YOU DO, YOU HYPOCRITES?

LogicallyRight Loc: Chicago

Another thing: you modern day conservatives are denying other people of their rights, like for example, trying to take away a woman's right to decide what to do with her own body,
>>>No such thing. You lie. You are talking about those anti a******n people. They are not trying to deny women the right to control their own bodies. (actually it often looks like they lost control and then don't care who gets k**led). They are trying to protect the life of the most vulnerable of human beings.

or robbing mostly people of color of their right to v**e through minor details, like the supposed misuse of hyphens, or not having a "permanent address,"
>>>Or not having V**er Picture I. D. so they can't prove who they say they are and might be misrepresenting themselves while trying to v**e, or actually trying to v**e for the dead or people who moved away, etc. Valid concerns.

And what about your contempt for organizations that fight for the constitutional rights of individuals, like the N.A.A.C.P., or the National Organization for Women, or the Gay Rights groups, or especially, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)?
>>>These organizations have long since lost their way in many cases, especially the ACLU.

And yet, you expect everyone to believe that you conservatives believe in the American way, that you support the U.S. Constitution and the Bill Of Rights?
>>>Absolutely. You don't seem to.

working class stiff Loc: N. Carolina

Lonewolf

TexaCan Loc: Homeward Bound!

Now! Now! Rumi! Calm down! What’s ruffled your feathers tonight?

You have stooped pretty low tonight! Correcting someone in grammar! Really!

I realize your favorite subject is on s***ery, I think I remember you did your thesis on the Civil War! You have always loved discussing this subject, and you are very informed on it! Good lesson, Rumi! 🤔🤔🤔🤔

As far as the rest of your rant! Save it for someone who actually cares about what you believe! With you attitude, I doubt anyone is going to want to play! Way overboard, you are!

A******n is murder! No other way to see it! A woman doesn’t have any more right to murder her baby than you have of murdering your grown daughter! Both are humans!

Are all of your other egos going to be this angry tonight?

bggamers Loc: georgia

Boy from the Bronx

What do you mean I "don't seem to" support the Constitution and the Bill Of Rights? I DO support them! I said so in my last comment, didn't I?

Remember I was talking about how a lot of you Conservatives have often violated the rights of other people? (The witch trials, the crimes of the Know Nothing Party and the KKK, s***ery, segregation, McCarthyism, harassing legitimate dissidents, denying women and the minorities their rights, especially the right to v**e, ignoring the rights of criminal defendants, thus leading to unjust convictions and punishments, etc) I was specifically chastising you right-wingers for ignoring or violating the rights of others! Does that sound like someone who doesn't believe in the Constitution or the Bill Of Rights? Of course not, because I DO support them!

It's people like YOU who DON'T support them. Sure, you say you do, but the t***h is you only believe in the Constitution when it suits you, not when it suits someone else, especially if that someone else is somebody you h**e!

For example, people like you say you believe in Freedom Of Speech, but you didn't say anything when Donald Trump was encouraging his supporters to attack Anti-Trump demonstrators during his campaign rallies in 2016, which was a clear violation of the protesters' right of Free Speech and Freedom Of Assembly.

You talk about bringing prayers back into the schools because you say you believe in Freedom Of Religion, but you're also the ones who want to deprive the MUSLIMS of their rights, even if they're born right here in America, because you have the crazy idea that all Islamics are "terrorists." This is just a part of the paranoia brought on by the 9/11 attacks, just the way the McCarthy blacklist was caused by our paranoia about so-called "subversives" (real and/or imagined) in our government, or in society in general.

So, who REALLY doesn't "seem to support" the United States Constitution or the Bill Of Rights?

bggamers Loc: georgia

why do you keep going back in time try staying here in the present

Mikeyavelli

Don't need my Ambien....yawn.

LogicallyRight Loc: Chicago

So, who REALLY doesn't "seem to support" the United States Constitution or the Bill Of Rights?
>>>You.

I said so in my last comment, didn't I?
>>>And I still don't believe you.

Does that sound like someone who doesn't believe in the Constitution or the Bill Of Rights? Of course not, because I DO support them!
>>>Anyone who lies as much as you just did about Conservatives is just that, a liar. And it doesn't say anything about you supporting the Constitution. Just a bunch of cheap misguided accusations.

It's people like YOU who DON'T support them. Sure, you say you do, but the t***h is you only believe in the Constitution when it suits you, not when it suits someone else, especially if that someone else is somebody you h**e!
>>>You don't know anything about me. Just more cheap accusations. I support the Constitution. I don't think it is 100% correct about everything, but I support it. More then so many Liberals who no longer, if ever, support the Bill of Rights. Now, does that include you?

For example, people like you say you believe in Freedom Of Speech, but you didn't say anything when Donald Trump was encouraging his supporters to attack Anti-Trump demonstrators during his campaign rallies in 2016,
>>>I don't ever remember saying anything about that. Can you show me that, or is it just another of your wild unsubstantiated accusations.

You talk about bringing prayers back into the schools because you say you believe in Freedom Of Religion, but you're also the ones who want to deprive the MUSLIMS of their rights, even if they're born right here in America, because you have the crazy idea that all Islamics are "terrorists." This is just a part of the paranoia brought on by the 9/11 attacks, just the way the McCarthy blacklist was caused by our paranoia about so-called "subversives" (real and/or imagined) in our government, or in society in general. " (real and/or imagined) in our government, or in society in general.
>>>I don't promote prayer in schools. Again, wild accusations. I don't blame all Muslims, but it is a fact that they have been involved in a much greater amount of terrorism cases then their percentages of the population what indicate. I have no paranoia over the 9 11 attacks. They were horrible and I would absolutely advocate extreme penalties for terrorists who k**l innocents in the name of their religion. You apparently would coddle them. I would also encourage the Justice department to go after subversives in our government and all of the criminals that are involved in our government, from Hilliary Clinton, if she is guilty of crimes (which I believe she is) on down. If you have a problem with that, I would consider you a major problem yourself.

Logically Right

Lonewolf