saltwind78 wrote:
Even though he was a believer in science, he was a very religious person. Somehow he was able to believe in both. Many years ago, I asked him how he did this, he answered that he studied religion as though science didn't exist, and he studied science as though religion didn't exist. Years later he denied that he ever said that.
A believer in both, hard to reconcile the two in a way, brings to mind for some reason John Polkinghorne, the physicist who became an Anglican priest and embarked on an endeavor to marry science and religion. I can imagine the conversation Polkinghorne and your friend might have had. I'm glad you have the memories of him that you do.