Trump removes independent watchdog for c****av***s funds, upending oversight panel
we know he couldn't keep his hands off this money he and his corrupt family will party now
son of witless wrote:
Link ?
Lonewolf's link is the product of psychological masturbation.
Lonewolf wrote:
your welcome
I will withhold comment for now because I do not know why this was done. I am sure that it was not because " we know he couldn't keep his hands off this money he and his corrupt family will party now ".
Lonewolf wrote:
we know he couldn't keep his hands off this money he and his corrupt family will party now
Scumbago the clown strikes again. Time for congress to impeach him again!
son of witless wrote:
Link ?
Why would you need a link? It is all over the news.
MeddlesomeMom wrote:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSW1N2AP02N
This is the second inspector he has fired in 4 days. He is putting control of the funds u der control of Jared Kushner and individuals that were not recommended by watchdog groups.
He replaced the Pentagon Inspector General with the EPA Inspector General. Big Deal. Since when does that mean Jared Kushner has control of the funds?
Kevyn wrote:
Scumbago the clown strikes again. Time for congress to impeach him again!
He replaced one Inspector General with the Inspector General from a different agency. There are more justifiable reasons for impeachment; I have heard through a reliable source,
(Adam Schiff for Prezbo) that not only did Trump not wash his hands after using the bathroom on the night of August 12, 1978, he almost certainly used too many squared of toilet paper, which led inevitably to the current C****a V***s p******c.
The thing is Americans need the name and the am out of every check cut.
It's our money not his!
Smedley_buzk**l wrote:
He replaced the Pentagon Inspector General with the EPA Inspector General. Big Deal. Since when does that mean Jared Kushner has control of the funds?
These guys either never research further then headline or don't understand what they read.
Kevyn wrote:
Why would you need a link? It is all over the news.
You are right. There is no written rule on OPP which says someone needs to provide a link when they say something has occurred. However, it would be common courtesy to do so. It is also in the interest of the poster, so that his readers get all of the relevant details and can verify that it is not a mistake.
Not that anyone on OPP has ever made a mistake.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.