What happened to "Women should be believed?"
Apr 5, 2020 16:20:40 #
Lonewolf wrote:
Why did republicans ingor the 22 women who accused trump?
you mean the 22 women that earn a living by trying to exploit wealthy single men
Apr 5, 2020 16:21:33 #
byronglimish wrote:
You want a reply to your praise of Ford and mental conviction of Kavanaugh on his frustration caused by some psycho woman who distorted her voice to appear as a innocent little girl?
That's my reply, you would be frustrated sitting in Kavanaughs seat too.
You'll never check Ford's history either....I mean like really check her out.
That's my reply, you would be frustrated sitting in Kavanaughs seat too.
You'll never check Ford's history either....I mean like really check her out.
Check Peter Strzok's family tree.
Apr 5, 2020 16:23:18 #
Michael Rich
Loc: Lapine Oregon
Lt. Rob Polans ret. wrote:
I don't think she will, the Dems aren't known for their tenacity and bravery.
This is true.
Apr 5, 2020 16:23:43 #
Michael Rich
Loc: Lapine Oregon
Lt. Rob Polans ret. wrote:
Check Peter Strzok's family tree.
Definitely there too.
Apr 5, 2020 17:20:03 #
dtucker300 wrote:
Probably for the same reason Democrats ignored Billi Clinton's accusers. Additionally, Trump was not a public servant at the time so it is the job of the local DA/Prosecutor to bring the charges against him. Do you actually have any idea how the legal system works in this country?
Biden is not a public servant now either but if he did what the a cussed said,he's not fit to be president,just as trump,but it's funny the right would be so down on biden but worship trump
Apr 5, 2020 17:26:47 #
proud republican wrote:
Senator Hirono said "Men should just shut up and listen!" So why than MSM and Democrats are ignoring a woman who accused Biden of sexual assault?? Or is this only goes for Republicans??
It goes for everyone except senile Democrat p**********l candidates.
Apr 5, 2020 17:47:48 #
dtucker300
Loc: Vista, CA
eden wrote:
For the record I thought Kavanaugh’s accuser
was very credible and while the incident alleged was clearly appalling, it was Kavanaugh’s shrill, self victimizing, obviously schooled angry rant that decided it for me. In my view he displayed an absolute lack of maturity and character necessary for a seat on the Supreme Court.
was very credible and while the incident alleged was clearly appalling, it was Kavanaugh’s shrill, self victimizing, obviously schooled angry rant that decided it for me. In my view he displayed an absolute lack of maturity and character necessary for a seat on the Supreme Court.
For the record, I thought just the opposite.
Apr 5, 2020 18:14:12 #
Apr 6, 2020 01:15:46 #
manning5
Loc: Richmond, VA
eden wrote:
You neatly avoided my comment about Kavanaugh’s temperament and instead went off on an uncontested tangent, namely that Dr Ford’s somewhat hazy recollection was not a disqualifier. You must watch Fox a lot. They do that dance too.
I had much rather have a human on the bench who reacted to false accusations as a real person would, not a stoic, wooden-faced automaton.
Apr 6, 2020 01:19:51 #
eden wrote:
All women who make credible accusations should be listened to regardless of who it is being accused or their position, or political orientation.
What is credible 20-30 years later?? Report it when it happens, go to a clinic or hospital & get an DNA test! That is proof! Not tears, drama, fantasy & innuendos years later!
Apr 6, 2020 01:31:28 #
eden wrote:
For the record I thought Kavanaugh’s accuser
was very credible and while the incident alleged was clearly appalling, it was Kavanaugh’s shrill, self victimizing, obviously schooled angry rant that decided it for me. In my view he displayed an absolute lack of maturity and character necessary for a seat on the Supreme Court.
was very credible and while the incident alleged was clearly appalling, it was Kavanaugh’s shrill, self victimizing, obviously schooled angry rant that decided it for me. In my view he displayed an absolute lack of maturity and character necessary for a seat on the Supreme Court.
What else would you expect from an obviously l*****t! His accuser was the "schooled" tool who tried to drum up 20 year old teenage emotions to ruin someone's life & career! How would you have reacted if that had happened to you?? When did it become wrong or a weakness to show emotion? Democrats do it all the time, that is why we call them "snowflakes"!!
Apr 6, 2020 01:33:09 #
dtucker300
Loc: Vista, CA
Auntie Dee wrote:
What is credible 20-30 years later?? Report it when it happens, go to a clinic or hospital & get an DNA test! That is proof! Not tears, drama, fantasy & innuendos years later!
To do otherwise is an insult to the Civil Rights and the Women's Rights movement of over half a century ago. You've come a long way, Baby! (unless you want to be your own worst enemy). AOC was asked why there has not been a woman President and she was still hung up on the reason being misogyny. SO, Obama can be elected the first black President in spite of all the r****ts in America, but according to her, there are more misogynists who h**e women? What a crock, on both accounts!
Apr 6, 2020 01:35:33 #
drlarrygino wrote:
If we only included sober minded and rational Supreme Court justices, Ruth "Dark Vader" Ginsberg, Elena Kaegan and Sonia Sotomeyor would be thrown out of the Supreme Court. They are all biased, r****t, justices who only v**e l*****t on every issue. A d********g bunch for sure.
Apr 6, 2020 01:36:37 #
byronglimish wrote:
Ford's testimony was all concocted by the spook division at Stanford University.
Dig into Ford's whole background...if you dare to be informed.
Dig into Ford's whole background...if you dare to be informed.
Apr 6, 2020 01:41:07 #
manning5 wrote:
I had much rather have a human on the bench who reacted to false accusations as a real person would, not a stoic, wooden-faced automaton.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.