What happened to "Women should be believed?"
Apr 5, 2020 07:01:31 #
eden wrote:
For the record I thought Kavanaugh’s accuser
was very credible and while the incident alleged was clearly appalling, it was Kavanaugh’s shrill, self victimizing, obviously schooled angry rant that decided it for me. In my view he displayed an absolute lack of maturity and character necessary for a seat on the Supreme Court.
was very credible and while the incident alleged was clearly appalling, it was Kavanaugh’s shrill, self victimizing, obviously schooled angry rant that decided it for me. In my view he displayed an absolute lack of maturity and character necessary for a seat on the Supreme Court.
You forgot to mention the immaturity of Billy Bob "rapist" Clinton, who raped and assaulted as many women as he could get his grubby hands on!! This was approved by his shabby, deceitful, evil wife, hitlery Clinton as Bill groped, grabbed pu$$y, fondled, molested and attempted to put his private part into every gal he could. Then he had the nerve to point his finger at us and say, on national tv, "I never had sex with that woman". He was a lying sack of dog excrement and you are too for not calling him, Joe Bribem and that other sack of $hit, Ted Kennedy out.
Apr 5, 2020 07:06:01 #
eden wrote:
All women who make credible accusations should be listened to regardless of who it is being accused or their position, or political orientation.
Hirohito now changed the demorat mantra to say, " All women should not be listened to because we know women like $ex as much as men and are usually money grubbers and are out to frame men".
Apr 5, 2020 07:09:20 #
eden wrote:
Correct. But there should be no excuse for not striving for objectivity. One might assume that women who have calculated the personal invective they will face and loss of privacy among other things might, just might, have a valid case that bears hearing out.
Some women know that if they look credible they could have their palm greased by a sleazy politician, usually a demorat, to lie and then become quite wealthy, well known and write many books on how they and all woman are victimized including HitleryRotten Clinton.
Apr 5, 2020 07:13:35 #
dtucker300 wrote:
Who is denying they don't? The liberals and Democrats. They have figuratively hidden Tara Reade out of view from the media so that Biden won't look bad. She just might have a valid case that bears hearing out. Where are the Democrats and why aren't they pursuing this like they did Kavanaugh's accuser, who by the way, I didn't find credible in the hearings. It seems this is the game plan the left often resorts to.
Balsey Ford in her testimony sounded like a 1st grade little girl that couldn't even talk correctly. She surely didn't sound professional or project an image of maturity. Her memory was as bad as Slo Joe Bribum's and she too must have been in the 1st stages of dementia.
Apr 5, 2020 08:08:14 #
drlarrygino wrote:
You forgot to mention the immaturity of Billy Bob ... (show quote)
Maybe you should read my posts properly before you respond so recklessly. I clearly called out Bill Clinton and Joe Biden . Sorry I missed Ted Kennedy, his brothers and MLK, not to mention both Bushes.
My point about Kavanaugh was that on the basis of his lack of composure, his red faced bluster and his plaintive self victimization I did not find him sufficiently impartial and mature enough in his outlook to be a Supreme Court Judge. His history with Dr Ford was too conjectural and he-said she-said to be a disqualifier in my view, even though such an incident should not be made light of no matter the distance in to the past.
Clarence Thomas was in the same predicament and pulled the race card to save his nomination but again he revealed himself in the hearing to be pouty and angrily self victimizing. Imagine John Roberts, a Bush appointee behaving in such a way.
We need sober minded adults on the Supreme Court, not tantrum throwing partisan hacks but I daresay that’s just another thing for people to disagree on.
Apr 5, 2020 08:11:41 #
drlarrygino wrote:
Hirohito now changed the demorat mantra to say, " All women should not be listened to because we know women like $ex as much as men and are usually money grubbers and are out to frame men".
Your divorce was rough I take it.
Apr 5, 2020 08:21:46 #
eden wrote:
Maybe you should read my posts properly before you... (show quote)
If we only included sober minded and rational Supreme Court justices, Ruth "Dark Vader" Ginsberg, Elena Kaegan and Sonia Sotomeyor would be thrown out of the Supreme Court. They are all biased, r****t, justices who only v**e l*****t on every issue. A d********g bunch for sure.
Apr 5, 2020 08:22:58 #
eden wrote:
Your divorce was rough I take it.
Don't believe in divorce unless I happened to have the misfortune in being hooked up with you.
Apr 5, 2020 08:28:53 #
drlarrygino wrote:
Don't believe in divorce unless I happened to have the misfortune in being hooked up with you.
Ever looked into Anger Management?
You are one chafed hombre.
Apr 5, 2020 08:30:13 #
eden wrote:
Ever looked into Anger Management?
You are one chafed hombre.
You are one chafed hombre.
I can see you flunked Charm School!
Apr 5, 2020 08:39:54 #
Michael Rich
Loc: Lapine Oregon
eden wrote:
For the record I thought Kavanaugh’s accuser
was very credible and while the incident alleged was clearly appalling, it was Kavanaugh’s shrill, self victimizing, obviously schooled angry rant that decided it for me. In my view he displayed an absolute lack of maturity and character necessary for a seat on the Supreme Court.
was very credible and while the incident alleged was clearly appalling, it was Kavanaugh’s shrill, self victimizing, obviously schooled angry rant that decided it for me. In my view he displayed an absolute lack of maturity and character necessary for a seat on the Supreme Court.
Ford's testimony was all concocted by the spook division at Stanford University.
Dig into Ford's whole background...if you dare to be informed.
Apr 5, 2020 09:20:03 #
eden wrote:
My point about Kavanaugh was that on the basis of his lack of composure, his red faced bluster and his plaintive self victimization
IOW, you just didn't like the way Kavanaugh looked at one point in the process ...
Apr 5, 2020 09:24:25 #
eden wrote:
His history with Dr Ford was too conjectural and he-said she-said to be a disqualifier in my view, .
Too conjectural??
She offered no proof that she and Kavanaugh had ever even met. She couldn’t remember where it happened, when it happened, or how she arrived at or departed from the party. None of the four alleged witnesses she eventually named, including one of her closest lifelong friends, corroborated her accusations. Prior to airing her allegations with the media, she scrubbed her entire social media history that indicated she was a liberal activist.
Apr 5, 2020 13:00:00 #
Proud Rep, You're not surprised are you that the LIBS, who says that "All women should be believed" have changed their tune when a Democrats accused of sexual assault
? rEMEMBER WHEN Juanita Broderick and others accused President Clinton of rape, and Hillary called them "Trailor Trash"?
? rEMEMBER WHEN Juanita Broderick and others accused President Clinton of rape, and Hillary called them "Trailor Trash"?
Apr 5, 2020 13:12:22 #
byronglimish wrote:
Ford's testimony was all concocted by the spook division at Stanford University.
Dig into Ford's whole background...if you dare to be informed.
Dig into Ford's whole background...if you dare to be informed.
You neatly avoided my comment about Kavanaugh’s temperament and instead went off on an uncontested tangent, namely that Dr Ford’s somewhat hazy recollection was not a disqualifier. You must watch Fox a lot. They do that dance too.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.