One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Are today's immigrants different?
Page <prev 2 of 9 next> last>>
Jul 2, 2014 17:16:05   #
engaged Loc: New York City and Broward County Florida
 
Alicia said:
Yes, these immigrants are different. I haven't checked into it but I know that years ago there was a requirement for immigrants to attend classes to learn the American English language. My husband taught English classes for the foreign born.

----------------------

This is true and I wish we would go back to that requirement. College ESL programs and government agencies are so careful to be politically correct and not insult foreigners that over the last 40 years or so, we demand very little of our immigrants.

I believe that if the US reinstated measures to require that immigrants learn English within a reasonable time period, say three years, there would be far less resentment among our population. I say three years because it takes two years to really learn the language at a College Freshman level.

We must continue to encourage immigration; otherwise, we will lose the creativity and dedication that keeps our country great. As far as I know, the majority of Americans are in favor of reforming the i*********n l*ws, but, in general, Congress is not representing the people. Perhaps we should write to our Senators and Representatives to add language learning and cultural education as a prerequisite for a path to citizenship. Any one have some ideas of what we the people can do?

Reply
Jul 2, 2014 20:06:52   #
Alicia Loc: NYC
 
engaged wrote:
Alicia said:

After moving to the SW I discovered many Mexicans who were still under the impression that that part of the country was still Mexican. They did not recognize that war.

I'm all for helping people in difficult situations but giving amnesty without expecting anything in return is wrong in my mind. I do believe that when a group of one ethnicity is working together and there are Americans present, they should be required to speak our language. I believe this stands for children too. Teaching classes in foreign languages does a disservice to the students. They should have language classes on weekends or after normal school hours.

I do understand some Spanish but I have had occasion, while rooming with two Latinas that they were talking about me believing I had no understanding. I allowed them to continue to think that way and was, therefore, armed with knowledge they were unaware of.

I do resent a person making a living here and not making the effort to, at least, learn the language of this country.
Alicia said: br br After moving to the SW I disco... (show quote)


------------------------

Great comment, Alicia. In terms of parents teaching their kids their native language, I am one of three cousins out of 18 who were taught Spanish. Most of my aunts and uncles on both sides intentionally did not teach their children to speak Spanish. The excuse they used was that they wanted to speak openly and not have the kids understand! Counter-productive, I think. It is always better to know another language, especially if learned before age 6. Not only will this add to your job prospects, but it also expand the neuronal networks. It has been proven that learning another language early increases IQ between 10 and 20 points. I learned this during my master's training in TESOL - Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages.

Sorry for going a bit OT (off topic).[/quote]
***************
I agree with you. I am sorry I did not learn to speak Polish but my grandparents were happy to be in this country, they wished to integrate into the society ASAP. Therefore, my parents could only speak a few words in that language but understood much more. All I hung on to was the dirty words and I've forgotten all but two. :D :D :|

Reply
Jul 2, 2014 20:27:38   #
Alicia Loc: NYC
 
engaged wrote:
Alicia said:
Yes, these immigrants are different. I haven't checked into it but I know that years ago there was a requirement for immigrants to attend classes to learn the American English language. My husband taught English classes for the foreign born.

----------------------

This is true and I wish we would go back to that requirement. College ESL programs and government agencies are so careful to be politically correct and not insult foreigners that over the last 40 years or so, we demand very little of our immigrants.

I believe that if the US reinstated measures to require that immigrants learn English within a reasonable time period, say three years, there would be far less resentment among our population. I say three years because it takes two years to really learn the language at a College Freshman level.

We must continue to encourage immigration; otherwise, we will lose the creativity and dedication that keeps our country great. As far as I know, the majority of Americans are in favor of reforming the i*********n l*ws, but, in general, Congress is not representing the people. Perhaps we should write to our Senators and Representatives to add language learning and cultural education as a prerequisite for a path to citizenship. Any one have some ideas of what we the people can do?
Alicia said: br Yes, these immigrants are differen... (show quote)

*****************
I don't think it necessary to demand immigrants achieve College level language sk**ls. But they should, at least, be able to conduct their daily business in English (American).

The only thing I can think of is for business that hire immigrants to insist that only American be spoken on the job. One of the places I visited that impressed me so much was The Netherlands Antilles (Aruba, Curacao and BonAire). Children learned to speak the native language, Papiamento, at home. It is actually a combination of Spanish and Dutch. I was amused when on TV I was listening to Spanish with the gutteral sounds of the Dutch.

In first grade, the students begin to learn English. By 5th grade they can speak English, Spanish and Dutch.

One of the people in the company spoke very little English. I was amazed that the girls I met (both attending college) could speak to my friend in Spanish and, without a hitch, speak to me in English. I believe this is a fact in Europe where the people of one country were very proficient in the languages of the countries that bordered on it.

I think it's sad that the learning of a foreign language is postponed until high school. Then usually, the only languages offered are Spanish, French, possibly German and Latin. At that age and using the accepted methods, it is so much more difficult to learn.

As an aside: How many of our representatives are conversant in any other language? Some of them have difficulty in speaking their native tongue.

On two occasions I had people speaking AT me. Honestly, I couldn't understand one word - not even "the." I discovered that on both occasions, they were Texans. They still can't pronounce the difference between something one sews with and that used for writing.

Reply
Jul 2, 2014 20:37:42   #
PoppaGringo Loc: Muslim City, Mexifornia, B.R.
 
Dave wrote:
Comparing immigrants then and now misses a major difference. Then they came here and had no social programs that provided them anything but opportunity - today they come to a society that provides a set of social programs that instantly makes them better off economically on day one than they were at home.


:thumbup:

Reply
Jul 2, 2014 20:40:25   #
PoppaGringo Loc: Muslim City, Mexifornia, B.R.
 
Alicia wrote:
***************
I agree with you. I am sorry I did not learn to speak Polish but my grandparents were happy to be in this country, they wished to integrate into the society ASAP. Therefore, my parents could only speak a few words in that language but understood much more. All I hung on to was the dirty words and I've forgotten all but two. :D :D :|


Would "gówno" be one of them? :lol:

Reply
Jul 3, 2014 00:33:56   #
ginger
 
JONDO wrote:
They are like rats coming off a diseased ship this time and they are being spread into the population by our own counterfeit government.If this isnt an impeachable offense, I dont know what is.


Well, if the republicans in the house would get off their dead asses and do SOMETHING, we might not have this problem. And sending them to stay with family members while awaiting their hearing is not an impeachable offence, but it does save the tax payers a ton of money for their support.

Reply
Jul 3, 2014 00:36:50   #
PoppaGringo Loc: Muslim City, Mexifornia, B.R.
 
ginger wrote:
Well, if the republicans in the house would get off their dead asses and do SOMETHING, we might not have this problem. And sending them to stay with family members while awaiting their hearing is not an impeachable offence, but it does save the tax payers a ton of money for their support.


How is it "saving taxpayers a ton of money" when Obama is asking for $2 Billion dollars to help support them?

Reply
Jul 3, 2014 08:32:16   #
Dave Loc: Upstate New York
 
ginger wrote:
Well, if the republicans in the house would get off their dead asses and do SOMETHING, we might not have this problem. And sending them to stay with family members while awaiting their hearing is not an impeachable offence, but it does save the tax payers a ton of money for their support.


I see, to you the problem with i*****l i*********n is that the Republicans won't legislate that they are no longer illegal. Now, that's some serious deep thinking. Perhaps while they're at it they can say they are no longer uneducated and unsk**led. Then they can do the same with the millions of Americans also uneducated and unsk**led - then just legislate that they are no longer on welfare, but on the government payroll serving as consumers.

Reply
Jul 3, 2014 17:25:50   #
ginger
 
Old_Gringo wrote:
How is it "saving taxpayers a ton of money" when Obama is asking for $2 Billion dollars to help support them?


He was not asking for the money to support them. They do need health checks to make sure they are not carrying any diseases. But a huge chunk of that money is for more/better border patrol.

Reply
Jul 3, 2014 17:29:22   #
ginger
 
Dave wrote:
I see, to you the problem with i*****l i*********n is that the Republicans won't legislate that they are no longer illegal. Now, that's some serious deep thinking. Perhaps while they're at it they can say they are no longer uneducated and unsk**led. Then they can do the same with the millions of Americans also uneducated and unsk**led - then just legislate that they are no longer on welfare, but on the government payroll serving as consumers.


Dave, you are one twisted person. No, what I was saying is that the republicans in the house refuse to even look at the immigration bill. We ALL know it needs to be done, but they won't. So, don't blame this mess on anyone but the house republicans.

Reply
Jul 3, 2014 19:41:58   #
JONDO
 
ginger wrote:
Dave, you are one twisted person. No, what I was saying is that the republicans in the house refuse to even look at the immigration bill. We ALL know it needs to be done, but they won't. So, don't blame this mess on anyone but the house republicans.
If they would deport every last one of them, we wouldn't be wasting our time and all this money thr costing us. Deport and forget that's what needs to be done. And it dont have to be first class on an airplane. They come over here like animals, send them back like animals.

Reply
Jul 3, 2014 20:06:02   #
Nickolai
 
Old_Gringo wrote:
How is it "saving taxpayers a ton of money" when Obama is asking for $2 Billion dollars to help support them?


The support is supposed to be temporary while they are being processed. The President has requested homeland security to move resources to the boarder, Obamas administration has deported over two million undocumented Immigrants and is on track by the end of 2014 to have deported more than Bush did in 8 years in office so that is a load of crap that Obama is bringing them in. They have been coming in since the 1960's around the time the Bracero program was ended. With the Bracero program brought documented green card holders in to work the crops and then they had to go back to their country after the Bracero program was halted they came willy nilly undocumented

Reply
Jul 3, 2014 20:06:06   #
ginger
 
JONDO wrote:
If they would deport every last one of them, we wouldn't be wasting our time and all this money thr costing us. Deport and forget that's what needs to be done. And it dont have to be first class on an airplane. They come over here like animals, send them back like animals.


can we send you back to where your family came from? they were probably i******s too.

Reply
Jul 3, 2014 20:50:09   #
PoppaGringo Loc: Muslim City, Mexifornia, B.R.
 
ginger wrote:
He was not asking for the money to support them. They do need health checks to make sure they are not carrying any diseases. But a huge chunk of that money is for more/better border patrol.


None of that is dedicated for border control.

Reply
Jul 3, 2014 20:51:28   #
PoppaGringo Loc: Muslim City, Mexifornia, B.R.
 
Nickolai wrote:
The support is supposed to be temporary while they are being processed. The President has requested homeland security to move resources to the boarder, Obamas administration has deported over two million undocumented Immigrants and is on track by the end of 2014 to have deported more than Bush did in 8 years in office so that is a load of crap that Obama is bringing them in. They have been coming in since the 1960's around the time the Bracero program was ended. With the Bracero program brought documented green card holders in to work the crops and then they had to go back to their country after the Bracero program was halted they came willy nilly undocumented
The support is supposed to be temporary while they... (show quote)


When has any government program been "temporary"?

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 9 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.