Wildlandfirefighter wrote:
So we have a situation here. Some people think that the C****-** v***s is no worse than the common flu and that America is over-reacting to the p******c. Most of us already know better. So if someone refuses to follow restrictions geared towards limiting the spread of the v***s and "flattening the curve", and they go out unprotected and catch the v***s and bring it home, and a family member gets the v***s and ultimately dies, should that person be held responsible for the irresponsible act? Could this be construed as murder or perhaps manslaughter? Or if someone who knowingly has the v***s refuses to self isolate and goes out in public, should there be a legal penalty applied? Some European countries have already instituted penalties for the latter that include both heavy fines and jail time.
So we have a situation here. Some people think th... (
show quote)
It has already started like the saying don't let any disaster go to wast many are out there who WANT to catch the v***s so they can infect everyone. When aids first came out they did this when they would find out they had it they deliberately went about infecting as many as they could. Sick minds do sick things there have been several arrested for going into grocery stores and coughing on all there produce most TEENAGERS. It makes you wonder what kind of future generation is being raised out there.Read where a 42 yr old who is train engineer drove a train off the track deliberatly to try and run it into the militarty ship mercy he wanted every one to know what their up to????