One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Mitsubishi Electric to export radar to Philippines in first defense package deal since ban lifted
Mar 28, 2020 08:24:33   #
Sew_What
 
Mitsubishi Electric Corp. won an order to deliver air radar systems to the Philippines for about ¥10 billion ($90 million), in the first defense product export from Japan, excluding parts, since its long-held arms trade ban was eased in 2014, a government source said Thursday.

The systems developed based on the JFPS3 and JTPS-P14 radars employed by the Self-Defense Forces will be provided to the Philippine Air Force, the source said.

JFPS3 is capable of detecting approaching fighter jets and missiles, and is used as part of Japan’s defense system against North Korea’s missile threats. JTPS-P14 is an anti-aircraft radar system usually carried on vehicles.

The deal was initially due to be completed by May, but negotiations have stalled due to the C****-** p******c, Japanese government sources said.

Since Japan removed its all-out arms export ban imposed during the Cold War, it has exported parts of the PAC-2 mobile missile defense interceptors, produced under license in Japan, to the United States.

It has also provided used SDF training aircraft to the Philippines for free, but Tokyo has not exported any complete defense products.

The Philippines is among several Asian countries that are involved in territorial disputes with China, which has been increasing its military presence in the South China Sea.

Japanese defense manufacturers have been falling behind foreign rivals due to constraints imposed by the previous version of the nation's three principles on defense exports, as well as their lack of competitiveness with pricing.

The government adopted three new principles on the t***sfer of defense equipment in April 2014 amid concerns the policy change could hurt Japan’s status as a pacifist state. The principles state that the country will continue to embrace the basic philosophy of being a pacifist state that abides by the U.N. Charter.

It will allow arms exports only if they contribute to international cooperation and security interests.

Still, Japan will prohibit the export of weapons to countries involved in conflicts and the ban would also apply when exports violate U.N. resolutions.

Reply
Mar 28, 2020 08:57:11   #
Radiance3
 
Sew_What wrote:
Mitsubishi Electric Corp. won an order to deliver air radar systems to the Philippines for about ¥10 billion ($90 million), in the first defense product export from Japan, excluding parts, since its long-held arms trade ban was eased in 2014, a government source said Thursday.

The systems developed based on the JFPS3 and JTPS-P14 radars employed by the Self-Defense Forces will be provided to the Philippine Air Force, the source said.

JFPS3 is capable of detecting approaching fighter jets and missiles, and is used as part of Japan’s defense system against North Korea’s missile threats. JTPS-P14 is an anti-aircraft radar system usually carried on vehicles.

The deal was initially due to be completed by May, but negotiations have stalled due to the C****-** p******c, Japanese government sources said.

Since Japan removed its all-out arms export ban imposed during the Cold War, it has exported parts of the PAC-2 mobile missile defense interceptors, produced under license in Japan, to the United States.

It has also provided used SDF training aircraft to the Philippines for free, but Tokyo has not exported any complete defense products.

The Philippines is among several Asian countries that are involved in territorial disputes with China, which has been increasing its military presence in the South China Sea.

Japanese defense manufacturers have been falling behind foreign rivals due to constraints imposed by the previous version of the nation's three principles on defense exports, as well as their lack of competitiveness with pricing.

The government adopted three new principles on the t***sfer of defense equipment in April 2014 amid concerns the policy change could hurt Japan’s status as a pacifist state. The principles state that the country will continue to embrace the basic philosophy of being a pacifist state that abides by the U.N. Charter.

It will allow arms exports only if they contribute to international cooperation and security interests.

Still, Japan will prohibit the export of weapons to countries involved in conflicts and the ban would also apply when exports violate U.N. resolutions.
Mitsubishi Electric Corp. won an order to deliver ... (show quote)

============
China wanted to monopolize the Pacific, and its tentacles extended all over the world. The C***d19 has slowed down its activities but it has already planted its roots all over the Pacific. The Spratley islands do not belong to China, but to the Philippines, South Korea, Japan, and other nearby countries. China has built an island there, and currently has military defense installed there. That is why China needs to be defeated on its economy to slow down its worldwide expansion of power.

Reply
Mar 28, 2020 09:17:18   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
Radiance3 wrote:
============
China wanted to monopolize the Pacific, and its tentacles extended all over the world. The C***d19 has slowed down its activities but it has already planted its roots all over the Pacific. The Spratley islands do not belong to China, but to the Philippines, South Korea, Japan, and other nearby countries. China has built an island there, and currently has military defense installed there. That is why China needs to be defeated on its economy to slow down its worldwide expansion of power.
============ br i China wanted to monopolize the ... (show quote)


How do you figure that any of those nations have anymore claim to the islands than China?

Building the island was genius

Reply
 
 
Mar 28, 2020 09:17:40   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
Sew_What wrote:
Mitsubishi Electric Corp. won an order to deliver air radar systems to the Philippines for about ¥10 billion ($90 million), in the first defense product export from Japan, excluding parts, since its long-held arms trade ban was eased in 2014, a government source said Thursday.

The systems developed based on the JFPS3 and JTPS-P14 radars employed by the Self-Defense Forces will be provided to the Philippine Air Force, the source said.

JFPS3 is capable of detecting approaching fighter jets and missiles, and is used as part of Japan’s defense system against North Korea’s missile threats. JTPS-P14 is an anti-aircraft radar system usually carried on vehicles.

The deal was initially due to be completed by May, but negotiations have stalled due to the C****-** p******c, Japanese government sources said.

Since Japan removed its all-out arms export ban imposed during the Cold War, it has exported parts of the PAC-2 mobile missile defense interceptors, produced under license in Japan, to the United States.

It has also provided used SDF training aircraft to the Philippines for free, but Tokyo has not exported any complete defense products.

The Philippines is among several Asian countries that are involved in territorial disputes with China, which has been increasing its military presence in the South China Sea.

Japanese defense manufacturers have been falling behind foreign rivals due to constraints imposed by the previous version of the nation's three principles on defense exports, as well as their lack of competitiveness with pricing.

The government adopted three new principles on the t***sfer of defense equipment in April 2014 amid concerns the policy change could hurt Japan’s status as a pacifist state. The principles state that the country will continue to embrace the basic philosophy of being a pacifist state that abides by the U.N. Charter.

It will allow arms exports only if they contribute to international cooperation and security interests.

Still, Japan will prohibit the export of weapons to countries involved in conflicts and the ban would also apply when exports violate U.N. resolutions.
Mitsubishi Electric Corp. won an order to deliver ... (show quote)


Economics make for strange bedfellows

Reply
Mar 28, 2020 10:15:49   #
Radiance3
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
How do you figure that any of those nations have anymore claim to the islands than China?

Building the island was genius

===============
By Geographical boundaries, the Pacific do not belong to China. China is farther away from there. The Philippines, Japan, and South Korea, or perhaps even Malaysia and Vietnam may have claims in the Spratleys. But not China.

https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/expeditions/the-philippines-and-spratly-islands-a-losing-battle/

The Spratlys do not belong to Chinese territorial waters by geographical boundaries. China has been bullying the real countries that own the territorial waters.

China's aggressive encroachment portrayed its Pacific dominance thus installed its roots into the islands. The Spratlys are very rich in natural resources.
https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/print_pg.html

Reply
Mar 28, 2020 10:19:30   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
Radiance3 wrote:
===============
By Geographical boundaries, the Pacific do not belong to China. China is farther away from there. The Philippines, Japan, and South Korea, or perhaps even Malaysia and Vietnam may have claims in the Spratleys. But not China.

https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/expeditions/the-philippines-and-spratly-islands-a-losing-battle/

The Spratlys do not belong to Chinese territorial waters by geographical boundaries. China has been bullying the real countries that own the territorial waters.

China's aggressive encroachment portrayed its Pacific dominance thus installed its roots into the islands. The Spratlys are very rich in natural resources.
https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/print_pg.html
=============== br i By Geographical boundaries, ... (show quote)


How are Japan and Korea closer?

Reply
Mar 28, 2020 10:50:13   #
Radiance3
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
How are Japan and Korea closer?

=============
It was how the Geographical water boundaries were measured. Remember, US used to have a dispute with the Alaska islands with Russia, due to its proximity of Alaska geographical boundaries. And to settle the dispute. US paid Russia instead on 1867, for $7.2 million. Alaska has the biggest land area mass of all US states.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.