Here we are dealing with a panic over a new v***s as if it's goign to wipe out the world population while, in fact, there is a much heavier death toll from other v***l diseases which are also very easily caught by simply breathing.
"Influenza associated mortality burden in the elderly was higher, with the lowest excess mortality rates of all causes, respiratory and circulatory diseases, pneumonia and influenza being 49.57, 30.80 and 0.69 per 100 000 people, and the highest rates being 228.16, 170.20 and 30.35 per 100 000 people, respectively. In the non-elderly, the corresponding lowest rates were -0.27, -0.08 and 0.04 per 100 000 people respectively, and the highest rates were 3.63, 2.6 and 0.91 per 100 000 people, respectively. The influenza-related excess mortality was higher in the north, with a minimum of 7.8 per 100 000 and a maximum of 18.0 per 100 000, and slightly lower in the south, with a minimum of 6.11 per 100 000 and a maximum of 18.7 per 100 000. There were also differences in deaths caused by different influenza v***s subtypes, with influenza A(H3N2) and influenza B v***s possibly posing a heavier mortality burden." This is per year, by the way.
If you want to do the math, there are about 13,600 "100,000's" in China. I assume they have the same v*****es that we do. For perspective, there have been, thus far, 3,287 C***d19 deaths in China and it's leveling off.
OK, if I see a fire ant on my foot, heck yeah, I react, but I don't shut down!
nwtk2007 wrote:
Here we are dealing with a panic over a new v***s as if it's goign to wipe out the world population while, in fact, there is a much heavier death toll from other v***l diseases which are also very easily caught by simply breathing.
"Influenza associated mortality burden in the elderly was higher, with the lowest excess mortality rates of all causes, respiratory and circulatory diseases, pneumonia and influenza being 49.57, 30.80 and 0.69 per 100 000 people, and the highest rates being 228.16, 170.20 and 30.35 per 100 000 people, respectively. In the non-elderly, the corresponding lowest rates were -0.27, -0.08 and 0.04 per 100 000 people respectively, and the highest rates were 3.63, 2.6 and 0.91 per 100 000 people, respectively. The influenza-related excess mortality was higher in the north, with a minimum of 7.8 per 100 000 and a maximum of 18.0 per 100 000, and slightly lower in the south, with a minimum of 6.11 per 100 000 and a maximum of 18.7 per 100 000. There were also differences in deaths caused by different influenza v***s subtypes, with influenza A(H3N2) and influenza B v***s possibly posing a heavier mortality burden." This is per year, by the way.
If you want to do the math, there are about 13,600 "100,000's" in China. I assume they have the same v*****es that we do. For perspective, there have been, thus far, 3,287 C***d19 deaths in China and it's leveling off.
OK, if I see a fire ant on my foot, heck yeah, I react, but I don't shut down!
Here we are dealing with a panic over a new v***s ... (
show quote)
One thing this v***s is really getting started it will spread all over the country,because cause people want do what heir being tols,many people still thing it's some h**x,f**e news.when China tells their people what to do and they do it or else.
roy wrote:
One thing this v***s is really getting started it will spread all over the country,because cause people want do what heir being tols,many people still thing it's some h**x,f**e news.when China tells their people what to do and they do it or else.
Although I can't actually read your comment and make sense of it, I will tell you that it obviously is fractionally small compared to current levels of v***l disease. It might grow but that has little to do with all these draconian measures we are taking. This is like seeing the temp jump from 100.1 outside to 100.15 outside and us panicking, racing out to the A/C warehouse and spending all we have for a new A/C unit but not having enough left to pay for installation!
nwtk2007 wrote:
Although I can't actually read your comment and make sense of it, I will tell you that it obviously is fractionally small compared to current levels of v***l disease. It might grow but that has little to do with all these draconian measures we are taking. This is like seeing the temp jump from 100.1 outside to 100.15 outside and us panicking, racing out to the A/C warehouse and spending all we have for a new A/C unit but not having enough left to pay for installation!
You, like the Italians who blew this off will be talking a different story three or four weeks from now, your examples of denial and the price paid will be Louisiana, Florida, and Tennessee, states with governors who still don't get it who will be k*****g people when other states contain it way better.
woodguru wrote:
You, like the Italians who blew this off will be talking a different story three or four weeks from now, your examples of denial and the price paid will be Louisiana, Florida, and Tennessee, states with governors who still don't get it who will be k*****g people when other states contain it way better.
Couldn't handle the math could you. Rhetorical.
People die every single year by the thousands upon thousands of diseases which we even have v*****es for, like the flu, which is easily caught from coughs, sneezes and contact and yet, up until now, no panic?
This panic is brought to you exclusively by the media and internet hype. If people start k*****g each other it will have nothing to do with deaths due to a v***s but exclusively due to the over hyped idiocy of the media. Y'all just looked the other way in 2009 when H1N1 got going. Now it k**ls thousands each and every year; some 400,000 in China alone last year based upon the study I posted. Why?
nwtk2007 wrote:
Here we are dealing with a panic over a new v***s as if it's goign to wipe out the world population while, in fact, there is a much heavier death toll from other v***l diseases which are also very easily caught by simply breathing.
"Influenza associated mortality burden in the elderly was higher, with the lowest excess mortality rates of all causes, respiratory and circulatory diseases, pneumonia and influenza being 49.57, 30.80 and 0.69 per 100 000 people, and the highest rates being 228.16, 170.20 and 30.35 per 100 000 people, respectively. In the non-elderly, the corresponding lowest rates were -0.27, -0.08 and 0.04 per 100 000 people respectively, and the highest rates were 3.63, 2.6 and 0.91 per 100 000 people, respectively. The influenza-related excess mortality was higher in the north, with a minimum of 7.8 per 100 000 and a maximum of 18.0 per 100 000, and slightly lower in the south, with a minimum of 6.11 per 100 000 and a maximum of 18.7 per 100 000. There were also differences in deaths caused by different influenza v***s subtypes, with influenza A(H3N2) and influenza B v***s possibly posing a heavier mortality burden." This is per year, by the way.
If you want to do the math, there are about 13,600 "100,000's" in China. I assume they have the same v*****es that we do. For perspective, there have been, thus far, 3,287 C***d19 deaths in China and it's leveling off.
OK, if I see a fire ant on my foot, heck yeah, I react, but I don't shut down!
Here we are dealing with a panic over a new v***s ... (
show quote)
If you believe that figure of 3287 coming from China, I've got this bridge...….
promilitary wrote:
If you believe that figure of 3287 coming from China, I've got this bridge...….
I should have said reported deaths.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.