tbutkovich wrote:
You need to change your name to “straight down” because that’s where your headed!
StraightUp is a name my friends gave me because it's how I like my whiskey.
tbutkovich wrote:
Does your definition of protecting the young apply to the euthanasia of the unborn or the fetuses of failed a******ns. That’s what the money is earmarked for.
First of all, most of the money earmarked for PP goes to treating women on a broad range of health issues that our s**tty healthcare system fails to cover. Secondly, a******n services are one of many provided by PP but it's not funded with federal money, except for limited cases such as rape. Federal money goes to all the other health services they provide. Some people don't trust PP to be honest about that. I guess just like everything else it comes down to trust.
One thing I know for sure is that they treated my daughter's UTI when she got too old for my policy to cover, she couldn't afford insurance on her own and the POS company she worked for was always certain to cut her hours to escape the legal obligation to provide her with insurance. She was in pain and right-wing America had no answer. Planned Parenthood did.
tbutkovich wrote:
V**e on the planned parenthood a******n issue straight up or straight in a separate bill addressing only that issue so we can sort out the wheat in Congress from the chaff, but not in this rescue package for the workers, small business and many corporations (who you happen to h**e). Then we can check the v****g record and v**e out the chaff.
I never said I h**e corporations. In fact, over the course of my career I co-founded three of them. Don't get confused... Just because I don't think trickle-down is good for America doesn't mean I h**e corporations.
I do see what you're saying about the pork and I agree in principle but so far I am finding no mention of PP being a part of the pork for this
rescue bill... (It's not a stimulus bill). I see all the chatter on right-wing, rumor-mill media but I'm not finding it anywhere in the proposed bill and the fact checkers are saying it's a false claim.
tbutkovich wrote:
By the way the corporate aid is in the form of federally funded loans which will have to be repaid. You’re against that unless, of course, it impacts the failed corporation where you or a member of your family works.
You make a lot of erroneous assumptions.
tbutkovich wrote:
Your not very wise “straight down!”
zzzz