One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Planned parenthood continues its k*****g ways.
Page 1 of 2 next>
Mar 22, 2020 16:20:52   #
LogicallyRight Loc: Chicago
 
It is my understanding that Planned Parenthood will continue in some locations to perform a******ns.

The rest of the world is trying to save lives. PP is planning to take lives.

Elective surgeries are put on hold so all non emergency medical efforts can be directed towards saving lives and battling this Kung Flu.

It is a matter of time.
She either had plenty of time to decide to k**l her baby before this crisis,
or will have plenty of time after the crisis subsides.
And the worst case after the crisis subsides, there will be plenty of families that would like to adopt her baby. Life will go on. Yeah, that's right. Life, a life will go on.

So I would like to propose that Planned Parenthood gets a new name. Let's see what we can come up with. And wh**ever we decide, never use Planned Parenthood again.

First choice: Not Planned, No Parenthood. Motto: Just a little snip in time.
Second choice:

Reply
Mar 22, 2020 16:33:36   #
Liberty Tree
 
LogicallyRight wrote:
It is my understanding that Planned Parenthood will continue in some locations to perform a******ns.

The rest of the world is trying to save lives. PP is planning to take lives.

Elective surgeries are put on hold so all non emergency medical efforts can be directed towards saving lives and battling this Kung Flu.

It is a matter of time.
She either had plenty of time to decide to k**l her baby before this crisis,
or will have plenty of time after the crisis subsides.
And the worst case after the crisis subsides, there will be plenty of families that would like to adopt her baby. Life will go on. Yeah, that's right. Life, a life will go on.

So I would like to propose that Planned Parenthood gets a new name. Let's see what we can come up with. And wh**ever we decide, never use Planned Parenthood again.

First choice: Not Planned, No Parenthood. Motto: Just a little snip in time.
Second choice:
It is my understanding that Planned Parenthood wil... (show quote)


A******n is the money tree of PP.

Reply
Mar 22, 2020 16:34:29   #
MalG
 
Crawl back into your 19th (or first ) century hole. You have no right to command another human what to do to or for their body. Your god is a a fraud and your leader is from the devil's workshop. So there too!

Reply
 
 
Mar 22, 2020 16:45:41   #
dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA
 
MalG wrote:
Crawl back into your 19th (or first ) century hole. You have no right to command another human what to do to or for their body. Your god is a a fraud and your leader is from the devil's workshop. So there too!


Quote:
You have no right to command another human what to do to or for their body


Even for an unborn? Who speaks for them? You do see the problem with your argument , don't you?

Reply
Mar 22, 2020 16:46:28   #
proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
 
MalG wrote:
Crawl back into your 19th (or first ) century hole. You have no right to command another human what to do to or for their body. Your god is a a fraud and your leader is from the devil's workshop. So there too!


If you don't know by now we have deadly v***s outbreak !! All elective procedures should be cancelled a******n included,unless the life of a woman in danger! But PP doesn't care about the outbreak,they only care about money! And BTW,the fraud and the Devil is no longer in the White House!! THANK GOD!

Reply
Mar 22, 2020 17:26:54   #
LogicallyRight Loc: Chicago
 
MalG wrote:
Crawl back into your 19th (or first ) century hole. You have no right to command another human what to do to or for their body. Your god is a a fraud and your leader is from the devil's workshop. So there too!


What a temper tantrum.

I remember back in the early sixties when I joined the Navy. Shortly after many of my friends and relatives and men all over America were drafted into the Army and sent off to war. I remember by cousin coming home in a box. His name is on that wall. Many of them thought that the government didn't have the right to tell them what they had to do with their bodies. Many went to jail rather then fight for their country. And they faced brutal capture, maiming or death. Many moved to Canada and are still there.

We aren't trying to tell a woman what to do with her body. We're trying to tell her what not to do with someone else's body, the baby that she is carrying, as mother nature has set things up for the survival of the species.

You are probably one of those that even think a woman has the right to decide on death for a baby that survived an a******n attempt and is left lying there crying on a table. I disagree. I believe that life is created on conception and there is no defining absolute moment between that time and when that baby/child is able to carry on for itself. So, it is human from the very start. It is a woman's obligation to give that baby/child a chance, as she was given a chance, to live its own life. Or you could run off to Canada as so many draft dodgers did.

Given the idea that a woman shouldn't have to carry a baby for nine months, that she did not plan on or want, I might be able to accept the idea that she has a right to have that child removed from her body. But only if she can do it without k*****g it first, preferably when it would have a chance to survive and not until.

Now shout away. I'm Logically Right

Reply
Mar 22, 2020 17:37:40   #
dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA
 
LogicallyRight wrote:
What a temper tantrum.

I remember back in the early sixties when I joined the Navy. Shortly after many of my friends and relatives and men all over America were drafted into the Army and sent off to war. I remember by cousin coming home in a box. His name is on that wall. Many of them thought that the government didn't have the right to tell them what they had to do with their bodies. Many went to jail rather then fight for their country. And they faced brutal capture, maiming or death. Many moved to Canada and are still there.

We aren't trying to tell a woman what to do with her body. We're trying to tell her what not to do with someone else's body, the baby that she is carrying, as mother nature has set things up for the survival of the species.

You are probably one of those that even think a woman has the right to decide on death for a baby that survived an a******n attempt and is left lying there crying on a table. I disagree. I believe that life is created on conception and there is no defining absolute moment between that time and when that baby/child is able to carry on for itself. So, it is human from the very start. It is a woman's obligation to give that baby/child a chance, as she was given a chance, to live its own life. Or you could run off to Canada as so many draft dodgers did.

Given the idea that a woman shouldn't have to carry a baby for nine months, that she did not plan on or want, I might be able to accept the idea that she has a right to have that child removed from her body. But only if she can do it without k*****g it first, preferably when it would have a chance to survive and not until.

Now shout away. I'm Logically Right
What a temper tantrum. br br I remember back in ... (show quote)


Well said.

Reply
 
 
Mar 22, 2020 17:44:02   #
LogicallyRight Loc: Chicago
 
Thanks. But the topic was about a new name for planned parenthood. I still like Not Planned, No Parenthood. And other ideas?

Reply
Mar 22, 2020 18:00:16   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
MalG wrote:
Crawl back into your 19th (or first ) century hole. You have no right to command another human what to do to or for their body. Your god is a a fraud and your leader is from the devil's workshop. So there too!
I agree, no one has the "right to command another human what to do to or for their body." So, what do you say about the millions of women out there who don't want to get pregnant but can't control their urge to screw every stiff-dicked stud that comes along?



Reply
Mar 22, 2020 18:11:51   #
dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
I agree, no one has the "right to command another human what to do to or for their body." So, what do you say about the millions of women out there who don't want to get pregnant but can't control their urge to screw every stiff-dicked stud that comes along?


And then they want the rest of us to pay for their stupid mistakes. And what do they learn from these mistakes, boys and girls? They can continue to look to everyone else to pay for their mistakes and the government will take care of them from cradle to grave so they can become dependent.

Co-dependent no more!

Reply
Mar 23, 2020 09:26:03   #
Peewee Loc: San Antonio, TX
 
LogicallyRight wrote:
Thanks. But the topic was about a new name for planned parenthood. I still like Not Planned, No Parenthood. And other ideas?


How about "any cock-a-doo"? Or too crass or honest?

Reply
 
 
Mar 23, 2020 09:37:52   #
currahee506
 
I understand our American Constitution does not authorize "murder."

Reply
Mar 23, 2020 09:46:49   #
sabbath Loc: meade co. ky.
 
LogicallyRight wrote:
What a temper tantrum.

I remember back in the early sixties when I joined the Navy. Shortly after many of my friends and relatives and men all over America were drafted into the Army and sent off to war. I remember by cousin coming home in a box. His name is on that wall. Many of them thought that the government didn't have the right to tell them what they had to do with their bodies. Many went to jail rather then fight for their country. And they faced brutal capture, maiming or death. Many moved to Canada and are still there.

We aren't trying to tell a woman what to do with her body. We're trying to tell her what not to do with someone else's body, the baby that she is carrying, as mother nature has set things up for the survival of the species.

You are probably one of those that even think a woman has the right to decide on death for a baby that survived an a******n attempt and is left lying there crying on a table. I disagree. I believe that life is created on conception and there is no defining absolute moment between that time and when that baby/child is able to carry on for itself. So, it is human from the very start. It is a woman's obligation to give that baby/child a chance, as she was given a chance, to live its own life. Or you could run off to Canada as so many draft dodgers did.

Given the idea that a woman shouldn't have to carry a baby for nine months, that she did not plan on or want, I might be able to accept the idea that she has a right to have that child removed from her body. But only if she can do it without k*****g it first, preferably when it would have a chance to survive and not until.

Now shout away. I'm Logically Right
What a temper tantrum. br br I remember back in ... (show quote)

Reply
Mar 23, 2020 14:42:06   #
Mtngal
 
Oh Plllleeeaaaasssseee! Why shouldn’t the guy just say “No”?
Oh yes, it’s ALWAYS the woman who is at fault.

Reply
Mar 23, 2020 16:17:55   #
Peewee Loc: San Antonio, TX
 
Mtngal wrote:
Oh Plllleeeaaaasssseee! Why shouldn’t the guy just say “No”?
Oh yes, it’s ALWAYS the woman who is at fault.


Then she should pick a partner that won't rape her.

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.