dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA

There are many on OPP clamoring for indictments and arrests of the deep state and others from the Obama-Clinton Cabal. It takes a lot of time to put these cases together but many are impatient with Bill Barr. You don't make an indictment until you have a case you think you can prove beyond a reasonable doubt in court. And much of the problem is liberal courts that keep issuing injunctions. This only will delay the inevitable in these cases. Remember that we are talking about High Crimes and Treason against the people of the United States and these scumbags will do anything to prevent it from seeing the light of day or being exposed to the half of America that trusted them. This is perhaps the greatest scandal in the history of the American government. They have to get it right to bring about justice. So even with more delays, have patience because, in the end, the t***h will win out.

JUDICIAL WATCH:

In another desperate attempt by the Clinton machine to delay t***h and accountability for her email conduct and how it impacted the people’s “right to know” under FOIA, lawyers for former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and her former Chief of Staff Cheryl Mills have asked the Court of Appeals to overturn a U.S. District court order granting Judicial Watch’s request for their depositions about Clinton’s emails and B******i attack records. Lawyers for Clinton and Mills filed a “Petition for Writ of Mandamus” earlier today.

The Clinton request comes in Judicial Watch’s lawsuit that seeks records concerning “talking points or updates on the B******i attack” (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:14-cv-01242)). Judicial Watch famously uncovered in 2014 that the “talking points” that provided the basis for Susan Rice’s false statements were created by the Obama White House. This Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit led directly to the disclosure of the Clinton email system in 2015.

On March 3, 2020, Judge Lamberth granted Judicial Watch’s request to depose Clinton about her emails and B******i attack documents. The court also ordered the deposition of Mills and two other State Department officials. Additionally, the court granted Judicial Watch’s request to subpoena Google for relevant documents and records associated with Clinton’s emails during her tenure at the State Department.

In December 2018, Judge Lamberth first ordered discovery into whether Secretary Clinton’s use of a private email server was intended to stymie FOIA; whether the State Department’s intent to settle this case in late 2014 and early 2015 amounted to bad faith; and whether the State Department has adequately searched for records responsive to Judicial Watch’s request. The court also authorized discovery into whether the B******i controversy motivated the cover-up of Clinton’s email. The court ruled that the Clinton email system was “one of the gravest modern offenses to government t***sparency.” The State and Justice Departments continued to defend Clinton’s and the agency’s email conduct.

Judge Lamberth overruled Clinton’s and the State and Justice Department’s objections to limited additional discovery by first noting:
Discovery up until this point has brought to light a noteworthy amount of relevant information, but Judicial Watch requests an additional round of discovery, and understandably so. With each passing round of discovery, the Court is left with more questions than answers.
Additionally, Judge Lamberth said that he is troubled by the fact that both the State Department and Department of Justice want to close discovery in this case:
[T]here is still more to learn. Even though many important questions remain unanswered, the Justice Department inexplicably still takes the position that the court should close discovery and rule on dispositive motions. The Court is especially troubled by this. To argue that the Court now has enough information to determine whether State conducted an adequate search is preposterous, especially when considering State’s deficient representations regarding the existence of additional Clinton emails. Instead, the Court will authorize a new round of discovery …
With respect to Clinton, the court found that her prior testimony, mostly through written sworn answers, was not sufficient:
The Court has considered the numerous times in which Secretary Clinton said she could not recall or remember certain details in her prior interrogatory answers. In a deposition, it is more likely that plaintiff’s counsel could use documents and other testimony to attempt to refresh her recollection. And so, to avoid the unsatisfying and inefficient outcome of multiple rounds of fruitless interrogatories and move this almost six-year-old case closer to its conclusion, Judicial Watch will be permitted to clarify and further explore Secretary Clinton's answers in person and immediately after she gives them. The Court agrees with Judicial Watch – it is time to hear directly from Secretary Clinton.

Judicial Watch will continue the fight to hold Clinton accountable and to bring out the t***h for all to see.


Where are Hillary Clinton’s Text Messages?

In January we released emails that included an August 2011 one from Huma Abedin to Hillary Clinton stating: “Sent you a couple of text messages.” The email was among other emails that had only recently and magically been found by the FBI and produced to the State Department.

When we inquired, the State Department denied the text messages existed.

So we have filed a FOIA lawsuit for all text and other electronic messages of the former secretary of state and her former deputy chief of staff (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:20-cv-00441)).

Last week, a federal court criticized the State and Justice Departments for providing no explanation about how these emails were found at this late date:
State failed to fully explain the new emails’ origins when the Court directly questioned where they came from.
We filed our recent FOIA lawsuit after State denied any responsive records exist in response to two January 2020 FOIA requests for:
All text messages, encrypted app messages and instant messages involving official government business sent or received by former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton from January 1, 2009 through February 1, 2013.

All text messages, encrypted app messages and instant messages involving official government business sent or received by former Deputy Chief of Staff Huma Abedin from January 1, 2009 through February 1, 2013.
So where are Hillary Clinton’s text messages? We uncovered the hidden Clinton emails, and now we’ve discovered that Secretary Clinton and her top aide Huma Abedin where talking by text.

This comes on top of another major development: U.S. District Court Judge Royce C. Lamberth granted our request to depose Clinton about her emails and B******i attack documents. The court also ordered the deposition of Clinton’s former Chief of Staff Cheryl Mills and two other State Department officials.

Additionally, the court granted our request to subpoena Google for relevant documents and records associated with Clinton’s emails during her tenure at the State Department.

Clinton repeatedly stated that the 55,000 pages of documents she turned over to the State Department in December 2014 included all of her work-related emails. In response to a court order in another Judicial Watch case, she declared under penalty of perjury that she had “directed that all my emails on clintonemail.com in my custody that were or are potentially federal records be provided to the Department of State, and on information and belief, this has been done.”

As they say, the Internet is forever, and the efforts by Clinton and the Deep State to cover her tracks continue coming up short.

Radiance3

================
I have no confidence on Bill Barr. So, many criminals were left unpunished. The Clinton case is a waste of time because Barr will just let her go free. Besides time is running out. All the crimes of Hillary will become outdated soon. And before Barr could look into that. He better not because he is wasting his time. He has done nothing on all the crimes of the people from the Obama administration. Barr has not yet helped Gen. Flynn who was innocent to begin with. Why. Barr has done nothing.

lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas

Yeah, it's not like anyone else appeals court orders they don't like huh.

dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA

Everyone does! The difference is sometimes it is used as a stalling tactic and sometimes to appeal a real wrong.