Dear Senator Menendez,
I have watched with great interest the discussion in the halls of congress regarding the "slight" to the Native American Indian population represented by the name of the capital's NFL team. However I believe that the congress is focusing on this in too narrow a fashion. In your discussion and deliberations with fellow senators, I implore you to consider the following:
The Kansas City Chiefs, the Atlanta Braves, the Cleveland Indians and of course the Cleveland Browns are all similarly offensive.
Equally offensive are blatant references to the Catholic religion among our sports team names. Totally inappropriate names such as the New Orleans Saints, the Los Angeles Angels or the San Diego Padres should be immediately sanctioned.
The name Yankees is patently offensive. Attempt to name a team the Richmond Confederates and see the response you get.
In similar fashion, names like the Oakland Raiders, Minnesota Vikings, Tampa Bay Buccaneers and the Pittsburgh Pirates glorify murder, rape and pillage just at a time that the nation is trying to come to grips with mass murders perpetrated against the innocent.
In closing, a much simpler solution would be to rename the Redskins the Foreskins, so that they more accurately represent the DickHeads in Congress who are focusing on this issue.
Best regards and please retire soon!
cold iron wrote:
Dear Senator Menendez,
I have watched with great interest the discussion in the halls of congress regarding the "slight" to the Native American Indian population represented by the name of the capital's NFL team. However I believe that the congress is focusing on this in too narrow a fashion. In your discussion and deliberations with fellow senators, I implore you to consider the following:
The Kansas City Chiefs, the Atlanta Braves, the Cleveland Indians and of course the Cleveland Browns are all similarly offensive.
Equally offensive are blatant references to the Catholic religion among our sports team names. Totally inappropriate names such as the New Orleans Saints, the Los Angeles Angels or the San Diego Padres should be immediately sanctioned.
The name Yankees is patently offensive. Attempt to name a team the Richmond Confederates and see the response you get.
In similar fashion, names like the Oakland Raiders, Minnesota Vikings, Tampa Bay Buccaneers and the Pittsburgh Pirates glorify murder, rape and pillage just at a time that the nation is trying to come to grips with mass murders perpetrated against the innocent.
In closing, a much simpler solution would be to rename the Redskins the Foreskins, so that they more accurately represent the DickHeads in Congress who are focusing on this issue.
Best regards and please retire soon!
Dear Senator Menendez, br br I have watched with ... (
show quote)
Your ignorant, and very venal r****t rant is so pertinent in this discussion. The mutts who want claim that they aren't r****ts and then have brain farts like you prove the depths of American, low IQ white's r****m. Keep on ranting you i***t you prove our points every day.
Inyourface wrote:
Your ignorant, and very venal r****t rant is so pertinent in this discussion. The mutts who want claim that they aren't r****ts and then have brain farts like you prove the depths of American, low IQ white's r****m. Keep on ranting you i***t you prove our points every day.
And you keep reasserting how ignorant, r****t motivated, and ridiculous you are with each post.
Old_Gringo wrote:
And you keep reasserting how ignorant, r****t motivated, and ridiculous you are with each post.
In the 21st century you moribund r****ts are an embarrassment to the average white person. You claim not to be bigoted and attack smarter w****s. You and your dwindling numbers are doomed .
cold iron wrote:
Dear Senator Menendez,
I have watched with great interest the discussion in the halls of congress regarding the "slight" to the Native American Indian population represented by the name of the capital's NFL team. However I believe that the congress is focusing on this in too narrow a fashion. In your discussion and deliberations with fellow senators, I implore you to consider the following:
The Kansas City Chiefs, the Atlanta Braves, the Cleveland Indians and of course the Cleveland Browns are all similarly offensive.
Equally offensive are blatant references to the Catholic religion among our sports team names. Totally inappropriate names such as the New Orleans Saints, the Los Angeles Angels or the San Diego Padres should be immediately sanctioned.
The name Yankees is patently offensive. Attempt to name a team the Richmond Confederates and see the response you get.
In similar fashion, names like the Oakland Raiders, Minnesota Vikings, Tampa Bay Buccaneers and the Pittsburgh Pirates glorify murder, rape and pillage just at a time that the nation is trying to come to grips with mass murders perpetrated against the innocent.
In closing, a much simpler solution would be to rename the Redskins the Foreskins, so that they more accurately represent the DickHeads in Congress who are focusing on this issue.
Best regards and please retire soon!
Dear Senator Menendez, br br I have watched with ... (
show quote)
That is hilarious, but don't worry some moron will say your being insensitive to foreskin, what a joke right, they didn't pick the name because they wanted a sissy name for they're football team,if anything its a term of endearment and of p***e and strength, funny how its only an issue now after 40 yrs, anything to keep people from paying attention to the problems in this country, sounds like a Reid stategy, not enough tax payer money in it for Pelosi :)
It seems that he really pissed you off and for that, if for no other reason, I'll call him friend.
Inyourface wrote:
In the 21st century you moribund r****ts are an embarrassment to the average white person. You claim not to be bigoted and attack smarter w****s. You and your dwindling numbers are doomed .
Old_Gringo wrote:
And you keep reasserting how ignorant, r****t motivated, and ridiculous you are with each post.
Old gringo/cold iron,
After reading Inyourface's post regarding your comments I would offer the following information for your (and other readers) consideration:
First of all, two days after the inauguration, on January 23, something called the Cyber-Warriors for Obama Project was activated. This is a project that is being paid for through funds from Obamas political corporation, the 501(c)4 "Organizing for Obama".
A binder with the name Cyber-Warriors for Obama printed in blue across the top. contains the names and e-mail addresses of 3,575 cyber assets, or warriors, listed in alphabetical order under about a dozen or so team leaders.
Info from a separate sheet indicates that most of these assets are being paid just over minimum wage, they work from home and have no overhead. (I believe there are about two dozen supervisors who make substantially more).
Question: Is it possible that "Inyourface" is one of these Obama "cyber assets"; His comments intended to only confuse the issue and denigrate the other posters' character? (I don't think he can really be as dumb as he sounds..... could he?)
Just saying...
1oldgeezer
1OldGeezer wrote:
Old gringo/cold iron,
After reading Inyourface's post regarding your comments I would offer the following information for your (and other readers) consideration:
First of all, two days after the inauguration, on January 23, something called the Cyber-Warriors for Obama Project was activated. This is a project that is being paid for through funds from Obamas political corporation, the 501(c)4 "Organizing for Obama".
A binder with the name Cyber-Warriors for Obama printed in blue across the top. contains the names and e-mail addresses of 3,575 cyber assets, or warriors, listed in alphabetical order under about a dozen or so team leaders.
Info from a separate sheet indicates that most of these assets are being paid just over minimum wage, they work from home and have no overhead. (I believe there are about two dozen supervisors who make substantially more).
Question: Is it possible that "Inyourface" is one of these Obama "cyber assets"; His comments intended to only confuse the issue and denigrate the other posters' character? (I don't think he can really be as dumb as he sounds..... could he?)
Just saying...
1oldgeezer
Old gringo/cold iron, br br After reading Inyourf... (
show quote)
Good point, I really think he is just that miss informed as most of his info seems to be old MSNBC Propaganda rederict, but I wouldn't put anything passed the baffoonery of the radical-libs. I will be keeping an eye out for his moronic posts, as much of what he says doesn't make sense even to the dems on this forum. Good looking out
cold iron wrote:
Dear Senator Menendez,
I have watched with great interest the discussion in the halls of congress regarding the "slight" to the Native American Indian population represented by the name of the capital's NFL team. However I believe that the congress is focusing on this in too narrow a fashion. In your discussion and deliberations with fellow senators, I implore you to consider the following:
The Kansas City Chiefs, the Atlanta Braves, the Cleveland Indians and of course the Cleveland Browns are all similarly offensive.
Equally offensive are blatant references to the Catholic religion among our sports team names. Totally inappropriate names such as the New Orleans Saints, the Los Angeles Angels or the San Diego Padres should be immediately sanctioned.
The name Yankees is patently offensive. Attempt to name a team the Richmond Confederates and see the response you get.
In similar fashion, names like the Oakland Raiders, Minnesota Vikings, Tampa Bay Buccaneers and the Pittsburgh Pirates glorify murder, rape and pillage just at a time that the nation is trying to come to grips with mass murders perpetrated against the innocent.
In closing, a much simpler solution would be to rename the Redskins the Foreskins, so that they more accurately represent the DickHeads in Congress who are focusing on this issue.
Best regards and please retire soon!
Dear Senator Menendez, br br I have watched with ... (
show quote)
Why don't you recommend the Washington Whities or Honkies: they own them anyways.
1OldGeezer wrote:
Old gringo/cold iron,
After reading Inyourface's post regarding your comments I would offer the following information for your (and other readers) consideration:
First of all, two days after the inauguration, on January 23, something called the Cyber-Warriors for Obama Project was activated. This is a project that is being paid for through funds from Obamas political corporation, the 501(c)4 "Organizing for Obama".
A binder with the name Cyber-Warriors for Obama printed in blue across the top. contains the names and e-mail addresses of 3,575 cyber assets, or warriors, listed in alphabetical order under about a dozen or so team leaders.
Info from a separate sheet indicates that most of these assets are being paid just over minimum wage, they work from home and have no overhead. (I believe there are about two dozen supervisors who make substantially more).
Question: Is it possible that "Inyourface" is one of these Obama "cyber assets"; His comments intended to only confuse the issue and denigrate the other posters' character? (I don't think he can really be as dumb as he sounds..... could he?)
Just saying...
1oldgeezer
Old gringo/cold iron, br br After reading Inyourf... (
show quote)
Thanks for the info. I will check it out, and use it when necessary to make a point.
As I read these comments I can't help but notice, all who have made a comment are either In Hiding or not from D.C. or Virginia. HAIL TO THE REDSKINS !!!! :roll:
OH, Sorry I didn't mention I'm a Virginia Son.Still residing in the Old D******n.
captjack66 wrote:
As I read these comments I can't help but notice, all who have made a comment are either In Hiding or not from D.C. or Virginia. HAIL TO THE REDSKINS !!!! :roll:
:thumbup:
Seems most of the leftys are small and need to hide.
alex
Loc: michigan now imperial beach californa
Inyourface wrote:
Your ignorant, and very venal r****t rant is so pertinent in this discussion. The mutts who want claim that they aren't r****ts and then have brain farts like you prove the depths of American, low IQ white's r****m. Keep on ranting you i***t you prove our points every day.
what do you liberals have against honoring an Indian the first coach of the Redskins was an Indian so the owner named the team The Redskins in his honor so who is the r****t
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.