One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Evidence Found of Sanders’ Payment to Violent C*******ts
Feb 16, 2020 20:48:02   #
no propaganda please Loc: moon orbiting the third rock from the sun
 
Evidence Found of Sanders’ Payment to Violent C*******ts

Well-known and popular p**********l candidates such as Vermont’s Senator Bernie Sanders can not control who supports them or believes in their cause no more than they can demand who dislikes them. And as with just about any politician or even celebrity, there are bound to be a few deranged individuals who choose, for some reason or another, to vow allegiance to them and them alone.

However, Sanders, and anyone else, for that matter, most definitely has a choice to encourage that behavior or dissuade their followers from acting or speaking too rashly. And for Sanders, it seems he has encouraged it and even paid for it.

One supporter of the Vermont senator was recently recorded saying some extraordinarily violent and h**eful things in regards to anyone who felt that Bernie should not become our president, or in his wishes Supreme Leader, as the man is prone to believe more in c*******m than democracy. The man and a few other supporters had been known to “volunteer” for the Sanders’ campaign but it was recently found out that they were actually on the payroll.

So Sanders was, in fact, paying these individuals to spew out this type of rhetoric. And even if he didn’t know exactly what they were implying, it doesn’t look good for a p**********l candidate to have such views being expressed through his campaign.

Prominent right-wing journalist and Project Veritas founder James O’Keefe made the discovery and posted about it on his Twitter account. A similar post by Washington Post reporter David Weigel was made, but it stated that the young man was a “volunteer” and not a Sanders employee. O’Keefe then came forward with FEC documentation that proved otherwise and publicly requested that a retraction of the Weigel’s story be made.

As Project Veritas reporter Eric Spracklen said, “Weigel said the subjects of our investigation were campaign volunteers, not true. To prove the inaccuracy, our Tweet linked to a page found on the Federal E******n Commission website showing the ‘volunteer’ was in fact a paid staffer of the Sanders campaign.”

After verifying the sources, Weigel did retract his post.

But Twitter, the social media giant whose platform had been used to publicize the fight over political disinformation, must have felt that they had to get involved because shortly afterward, they suspended O’Keefe’s account.

No, not Weigel, who had spread the wrong information, but O’Keefe, the one who brought t***h to light.

According to Twitter, O’Keefe violated one of their policies, namely one that prohibits the posting of other’s personal and “private information without their express authorization and permission.”

But as we noted before, the only information O’Keefe used was found on a very public website from the FEC. As Project Veritas said, “The information we reported is in the public domain, there is nothing ‘private’ about it.”

But apparently, that doesn’t really matter to Twitter. O’Keefe’s account was “locked” on Tuesday, suspended indefinitely. And as of Friday, it was still that way.

Project Veritas has sought out an explanation for this several times with no response from the social media platform.

They reported on Thursday, “UPDATE: @Twitter has still not responded to @JamesOKeefeIII appeal for reinstatement after being LOCKED for reporting an @FEC paystub of @BernieSanders campaign Kyle Jurek; information that is publicly available and easily accessible.”

What seems to be the real issue here is that O’Keefe made accusations against a p**********l candidate that apparently someone within the higher-ups at Twitter supports. They don’t really care where the information came from or even if it’s true or not. What matters is if their wealthy socialist candidate wins.

And those like O’Keefe are making that harder to accomplish. After all, they can’t have people knowing that Sanders employs c*******t renegades hell-bent on seeing violent acts being taken out on their opponents.

To be clear, we aren’t just talking about a few punks who maybe incite a little vandalism.

These are people who passionately stated that if the DNC nominated any other candidate than Sanders, their journalists should be d**gged “out by their hair and light them on fire in the streets.” They are young men who publicly applauded the acts of Soviet reeducation camps and gulags that k**led millions. And those who would have no problem resorting to a 1917 Russia-like violence if they don’t get what they want.

And yet, Twitter would rather see O’Keefe silenced then these c*******t-pushing individuals.
Subscribe Free

Reply
Feb 16, 2020 21:32:56   #
Radiance3
 
no propaganda please wrote:
Evidence Found of Sanders’ Payment to Violent C*******ts

Well-known and popular p**********l candidates such as Vermont’s Senator Bernie Sanders can not control who supports them or believes in their cause no more than they can demand who dislikes them. And as with just about any politician or even celebrity, there are bound to be a few deranged individuals who choose, for some reason or another, to vow allegiance to them and them alone.

However, Sanders, and anyone else, for that matter, most definitely has a choice to encourage that behavior or dissuade their followers from acting or speaking too rashly. And for Sanders, it seems he has encouraged it and even paid for it.

One supporter of the Vermont senator was recently recorded saying some extraordinarily violent and h**eful things in regards to anyone who felt that Bernie should not become our president, or in his wishes Supreme Leader, as the man is prone to believe more in c*******m than democracy. The man and a few other supporters had been known to “volunteer” for the Sanders’ campaign but it was recently found out that they were actually on the payroll.

So Sanders was, in fact, paying these individuals to spew out this type of rhetoric. And even if he didn’t know exactly what they were implying, it doesn’t look good for a p**********l candidate to have such views being expressed through his campaign.

Prominent right-wing journalist and Project Veritas founder James O’Keefe made the discovery and posted about it on his Twitter account. A similar post by Washington Post reporter David Weigel was made, but it stated that the young man was a “volunteer” and not a Sanders employee. O’Keefe then came forward with FEC documentation that proved otherwise and publicly requested that a retraction of the Weigel’s story be made.

As Project Veritas reporter Eric Spracklen said, “Weigel said the subjects of our investigation were campaign volunteers, not true. To prove the inaccuracy, our Tweet linked to a page found on the Federal E******n Commission website showing the ‘volunteer’ was in fact a paid staffer of the Sanders campaign.”

After verifying the sources, Weigel did retract his post.

But Twitter, the social media giant whose platform had been used to publicize the fight over political disinformation, must have felt that they had to get involved because shortly afterward, they suspended O’Keefe’s account.

No, not Weigel, who had spread the wrong information, but O’Keefe, the one who brought t***h to light.

According to Twitter, O’Keefe violated one of their policies, namely one that prohibits the posting of other’s personal and “private information without their express authorization and permission.”

But as we noted before, the only information O’Keefe used was found on a very public website from the FEC. As Project Veritas said, “The information we reported is in the public domain, there is nothing ‘private’ about it.”

But apparently, that doesn’t really matter to Twitter. O’Keefe’s account was “locked” on Tuesday, suspended indefinitely. And as of Friday, it was still that way.

Project Veritas has sought out an explanation for this several times with no response from the social media platform.

They reported on Thursday, “UPDATE: @Twitter has still not responded to @JamesOKeefeIII appeal for reinstatement after being LOCKED for reporting an @FEC paystub of @BernieSanders campaign Kyle Jurek; information that is publicly available and easily accessible.”

What seems to be the real issue here is that O’Keefe made accusations against a p**********l candidate that apparently someone within the higher-ups at Twitter supports. They don’t really care where the information came from or even if it’s true or not. What matters is if their wealthy socialist candidate wins.

And those like O’Keefe are making that harder to accomplish. After all, they can’t have people knowing that Sanders employs c*******t renegades hell-bent on seeing violent acts being taken out on their opponents.

To be clear, we aren’t just talking about a few punks who maybe incite a little vandalism.

These are people who passionately stated that if the DNC nominated any other candidate than Sanders, their journalists should be d**gged “out by their hair and light them on fire in the streets.” They are young men who publicly applauded the acts of Soviet reeducation camps and gulags that k**led millions. And those who would have no problem resorting to a 1917 Russia-like violence if they don’t get what they want.

And yet, Twitter would rather see O’Keefe silenced then these c*******t-pushing individuals.
Subscribe Free
Evidence Found of Sanders’ Payment to Violent C***... (show quote)

=================
Sanders would bring us to very dangerous c*******t country. He has been a c*******t for years.All is campaign e******ns are LIES. Trying to lure the free loaders to v**e for him.

Reply
Feb 16, 2020 23:06:57   #
CounterRevolutionary
 
Radiance3 wrote:
=================
Sanders would bring us to very dangerous c*******t country. He has been a c*******t for years.All is campaign e******ns are LIES. Trying to lure the free loaders to v**e for him.


Why, oh why, can't these ridiculous socialists and c*******ts recognize that their own progressive presidents and congressmen are responsible for creating poverty?

First, they created a Marxist government central bank that prints so much funny money devaluing our time and labor.

Secondly, the Progressive politicians created a Marxist Progressive Tax, stifling small business growth and competition, actually entrenching the corporate monopolies they pretend to oppose.

Thirdly, they created the 1931 Davis-Bacon Act, mandating government infrastructure be build by only a unionized workforce, cutting out 86% of non-unionized workers from bidding on government contracts, thus jacking up the cost of building some 33%, socking the cost to the taxpayers. The extra cost ends up in the pockets of the progressive politicians and labor union bosses.

Meanwhile, union membership remains at an all-time low since is was made mandatory, workers unable to unshackle themselves from crooked labor leaders. Passing the National Right to Work Act would actually clean up the unions and increase their membership. but, that's another story.

In fact, right now, President Trump's $287 billion bill sits idle, awaiting passage in the House to fund his plans to rebuild our infrastructure, blocked by the Democrat controlled House, insisting our President abide by the 1931 antiquated Davis-Bacon Act. President Trump can easily wave this law at the stroke of his pen; it has been done by his predecessors in the White House 4 times before by President Roosevelt under the New Deal, Nixon, GH Bush Sr., and GW Bush.

You might consider writing your congressional Representatives to help us jump start the economy for the millions of unemployed workers on the West Coast still suffering in Liberal La La Land - Washington, Oregon and California. Or better yet, write President Trump to wave the Davis-Bacon Act and get the ball rolling.

Reply
 
 
Feb 16, 2020 23:31:24   #
dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA
 
no propaganda please wrote:
Evidence Found of Sanders’ Payment to Violent C*******ts

Well-known and popular p**********l candidates such as Vermont’s Senator Bernie Sanders can not control who supports them or believes in their cause no more than they can demand who dislikes them. And as with just about any politician or even celebrity, there are bound to be a few deranged individuals who choose, for some reason or another, to vow allegiance to them and them alone.

However, Sanders, and anyone else, for that matter, most definitely has a choice to encourage that behavior or dissuade their followers from acting or speaking too rashly. And for Sanders, it seems he has encouraged it and even paid for it.

One supporter of the Vermont senator was recently recorded saying some extraordinarily violent and h**eful things in regards to anyone who felt that Bernie should not become our president, or in his wishes Supreme Leader, as the man is prone to believe more in c*******m than democracy. The man and a few other supporters had been known to “volunteer” for the Sanders’ campaign but it was recently found out that they were actually on the payroll.

So Sanders was, in fact, paying these individuals to spew out this type of rhetoric. And even if he didn’t know exactly what they were implying, it doesn’t look good for a p**********l candidate to have such views being expressed through his campaign.

Prominent right-wing journalist and Project Veritas founder James O’Keefe made the discovery and posted about it on his Twitter account. A similar post by Washington Post reporter David Weigel was made, but it stated that the young man was a “volunteer” and not a Sanders employee. O’Keefe then came forward with FEC documentation that proved otherwise and publicly requested that a retraction of the Weigel’s story be made.

As Project Veritas reporter Eric Spracklen said, “Weigel said the subjects of our investigation were campaign volunteers, not true. To prove the inaccuracy, our Tweet linked to a page found on the Federal E******n Commission website showing the ‘volunteer’ was in fact a paid staffer of the Sanders campaign.”

After verifying the sources, Weigel did retract his post.

But Twitter, the social media giant whose platform had been used to publicize the fight over political disinformation, must have felt that they had to get involved because shortly afterward, they suspended O’Keefe’s account.

No, not Weigel, who had spread the wrong information, but O’Keefe, the one who brought t***h to light.

According to Twitter, O’Keefe violated one of their policies, namely one that prohibits the posting of other’s personal and “private information without their express authorization and permission.”

But as we noted before, the only information O’Keefe used was found on a very public website from the FEC. As Project Veritas said, “The information we reported is in the public domain, there is nothing ‘private’ about it.”

But apparently, that doesn’t really matter to Twitter. O’Keefe’s account was “locked” on Tuesday, suspended indefinitely. And as of Friday, it was still that way.

Project Veritas has sought out an explanation for this several times with no response from the social media platform.

They reported on Thursday, “UPDATE: @Twitter has still not responded to @JamesOKeefeIII appeal for reinstatement after being LOCKED for reporting an @FEC paystub of @BernieSanders campaign Kyle Jurek; information that is publicly available and easily accessible.”

What seems to be the real issue here is that O’Keefe made accusations against a p**********l candidate that apparently someone within the higher-ups at Twitter supports. They don’t really care where the information came from or even if it’s true or not. What matters is if their wealthy socialist candidate wins.

And those like O’Keefe are making that harder to accomplish. After all, they can’t have people knowing that Sanders employs c*******t renegades hell-bent on seeing violent acts being taken out on their opponents.

To be clear, we aren’t just talking about a few punks who maybe incite a little vandalism.

These are people who passionately stated that if the DNC nominated any other candidate than Sanders, their journalists should be d**gged “out by their hair and light them on fire in the streets.” They are young men who publicly applauded the acts of Soviet reeducation camps and gulags that k**led millions. And those who would have no problem resorting to a 1917 Russia-like violence if they don’t get what they want.

And yet, Twitter would rather see O’Keefe silenced then these c*******t-pushing individuals.
Subscribe Free
Evidence Found of Sanders’ Payment to Violent C***... (show quote)



But look at what you can have with socialism! Tough choice isn't it.
But look at what you can have with socialism! Toug...



Reply
Feb 17, 2020 13:24:34   #
Mike Easterday
 
They are Stalinist type c****es ! The worst kind !!!

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.