What would happen if Sicilianthing was a President?? (Page 2): ============== Maybe planning that scary B and C.

Radiance3

proud republican wrote:

Speaking of Sicilianthing,where is he?? He has been awfully quiet today!!! I wonder what's up???

==============
Maybe planning that scary B and C.

proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA

Radiance3 wrote:

================
I see some valid points on his constitutional reforms, but I dread his means of fixing them. I tried several ways to calm him down, and do the right ways, but didn't work. He is as stubborn as a rock.

He would be dangerous as a President!!! He would be going for war without trying peace first!!!!That's what scares me about people like him! He maybe a nice person,but his means of fixing things are very dangerous!!

Radiance3

proud republican wrote:

He would be dangerous as a President!!! He would be going for war without trying peace first!!!!That's what scares me about people like him! He maybe a nice person,but his means of fixing things are very dangerous!!

=============
That was what I have been trying to fight with him. I did everything, all options on the table, but he must avoid those violence, that defeats the whole purpose of solving problems. My patience was up to the roof, thinking of any possibility to changing his mind. Nothing worked.

manning5 Loc: Richmond, VA

Radiance3 wrote:

=============
That was what I have been trying to fight with him. I did everything, all options on the table, but he must avoid those violence, that defeats the whole purpose of solving problems. My patience was up to the roof, thinking of any possibility to changing his mind. Nothing worked.

Is it possible that sic is a disinformation troll?

Radiance3

manning5 wrote:

Is it possible that sic is a disinformation troll?

============
Sici has all the information coming from the blog of Ana Von Rietz. She was a judge in Alaska, now retired, focused on digging up all the falsities of our governance including the Vatican. The constitution and the framers intents versus how it is presently applied.

They've accused and blamed the president of not fulfilling the constitution as intended by the Founders.

Sici's demands are various, and impossible to make considering the complexities and volume of events happening every day. Problems have accumulated over time, and president Trump no matter how he tries his best, is the end receiver of the problems that had accumulated over the years.

And Sici demands that the president acts to solving these problems. There is no perfect government. I credit the efforts of president Trump for alleviating the economic conditions of our country, in addition to the improvements of our national security.

With the changes of time, technology and the volume of information, the constitution needs amendments, additions, and revisions, on various areas applied to our governance.

However, Sici's approach to doing this, without going thru the proper protocol is very dangerous. If that happens, the process defeats the objectives of his changes to correct. It is adverse and dangerous. That is where Sici is banking at present. To forcibly require the president and the administration comply to his demands on following the constitution. Otherwise, he has that Plans B and C. I don't know what that is.

I tried various motivations to peacefully ask him solving these problems via a step process according to priorities, and proper protocol. Changes have to go thru the legislative process. And others must be addressed to the appropriate segment of the administration, via the department heads’ policies, before going thru the president's approval.

The Department heads, then to the president. Effective communication is very important.

I tried various motivations to urging him to solve legally, peacefully, with no violence. I appealed, I prayed with him, I cried, I yelled, I became mellow and kind, nothing worked. Sici is a stubborn person. He has a plan B and C. Hope he thinks about it very carefully. I still have to pray that he does not use force. I hope he is just bluffing, and thinks about what I've said.

Coos Bay Tom Loc: coos bay oregon

proud republican wrote:

We probably would be in Civil War by now!!!

Thank God for President Trump!! :sm24

Urgent !! Warning!! Alert !!---

Nailed it.

lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas

proud republican wrote:

We probably would be in Civil War by now!!!

Thank God for President Trump!! :sm24

Somebody getting under your skin?

Cuda2020

working class stiff wrote:

I don't know....I have a grudging respect for sicilianthing. He does use the same metrics to measure the Trump administration's performance that he used for the Obama administration.

Can't fault him for that.

True that

Radiance3

proud republican wrote:

We probably would be in Civil War by now!!!

Thank God for President Trump!! :sm24

==============
Here is Sicilian's final answer.

Final Answer:
—"That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness… it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security."****

I wonder why we have a 3 tiered justice system.
Why are these innocent people but set up were convicted, and others who've committed worst are free?
Stone – Charged
Flynn – Charged
Papadopoulos – Charged
Gates – Charged
Cohen – Charged

McCabe – Pass
Comey – Pass
Brennan – Pass
Clapper – Pass
Podesta – Pass
Hillary not charged, and more in the Deep State, and the Ukraine collusion.

proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA

lpnmajor wrote:

Somebody getting under your skin?

Nah!!! Just curious!!!

manning5 Loc: Richmond, VA

proud republican wrote:

Nah!!! Just curious!!!

So sic is an overzealous partisan, that wants adherence to the Constitution but cutting through the legal processes to achieve what he thinks is right. He is definitely edgy, that I know!