Trumps defense--typical ad hominem attack: Not a single republican defended Trump as they were more consumed with attacking the messenger...

PeterS

Not a single republican defended Trump as they were more consumed with attacking the messenger...

https://www.msnbc.com/hardball/watch/chris-matthews-not-one-republican-defended-trump-s-character-during-the-impeachment-debate-75397701733?cid=sm_npd_ms_fb_hb&fbclid=IwAR2q56gMcayMCPvf6JqUKcUWjQztQgqaUubRX5kvmL4Ruc1XqBPHSbup9Ig

okie don

Chris Matthews huh.
Lol 😁

American Vet

PeterS wrote:

Not a single republican defended Trump as they were more consumed with attacking the messenger...

https://www.msnbc.com/hardball/watch/chris-matthews-not-one-republican-defended-trump-s-character-during-the-impeachment-debate-75397701733?cid=sm_npd_ms_fb_hb&fbclid=IwAR2q56gMcayMCPvf6JqUKcUWjQztQgqaUubRX5kvmL4Ruc1XqBPHSbup9Ig

The 'attacker' is a mad dog with nothing but innuendo.....

son of witless

okie don wrote:

Chris Matthews huh.
Lol 😁

The Albino.

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

okie don wrote:

Chris Matthews huh.
Lol 😁

Mr tingles up my leg.

Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon

PeterS wrote:

Not a single republican defended Trump as they were more consumed with attacking the messenger...

https://www.msnbc.com/hardball/watch/chris-matthews-not-one-republican-defended-trump-s-character-during-the-impeachment-debate-75397701733?cid=sm_npd_ms_fb_hb&fbclid=IwAR2q56gMcayMCPvf6JqUKcUWjQztQgqaUubRX5kvmL4Ruc1XqBPHSbup9Ig

Your argument is dead....null and void.

Smedley_buzkill

okie don wrote:

Chris Matthews huh.
Lol 😁

Give Matthews a break. He hasn't been himself since he found out he can never have Nancy Pelosi's baby.

Lonewolf

He had no defense none just Moscow Mitch coverup

Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon

Lonewolf wrote:

He had no defense none just Moscow Mitch coverup

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😱😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

son of witless

Lonewolf wrote:

He had no defense none just Moscow Mitch coverup

Defense to whom ? To the Senate ? The Senate is just as partisan as the House. To the American V**er ? They will give you their answer in November. To you ? Why bother ?

Lonewolf

son of witless wrote:

Defense to whom ? To the Senate ? The Senate is just as partisan as the House. To the American V**er ? They will give you their answer in November. To you ? Why bother ?

your right

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

Lonewolf wrote:

He had no defense none just Moscow Mitch coverup

For your information Mitch’s nefarious ties are with China not Moscow. But why let facts get in the way?

son of witless

Lonewolf wrote:

your right

Thank you. Whether anyone agrees with my conclusions, my logic is infallible. Your guys knew going in that they would never convict President Trump in a Republican Senate. So what was the purpose ? There were two. To damage Trump politically. We will know in November. The second was to damage Senate Republicans so that Senator Schumer can be the Majority Leader. I honestly have no idea if that worked. Again November will either validate that strategy or it won't.

From a tactical viewpoint, if I was your side, I would never have tried such a dangerous move in an e******n year. It could boomerang on you. I would have done it after the e******n. Three years of failed attacks on Trump have inoculated him.

Dwight Logan

PeterS wrote:

Not a single republican defended Trump as they were more consumed with attacking the messenger...

https://www.msnbc.com/hardball/watch/chris-matthews-not-one-republican-defended-trump-s-character-during-the-impeachment-debate-75397701733?cid=sm_npd_ms_fb_hb&fbclid=IwAR2q56gMcayMCPvf6JqUKcUWjQztQgqaUubRX5kvmL4Ruc1XqBPHSbup9Ig

I believe you like using labels. You called Trumps defense "ad hominem." I believe the house impeachment efforts were "Ad nausium."

padremike Loc: Phenix City, Al

PeterS wrote:

Not a single republican defended Trump as they were more consumed with attacking the messenger...

https://www.msnbc.com/hardball/watch/chris-matthews-not-one-republican-defended-trump-s-character-during-the-impeachment-debate-75397701733?cid=sm_npd_ms_fb_hb&fbclid=IwAR2q56gMcayMCPvf6JqUKcUWjQztQgqaUubRX5kvmL4Ruc1XqBPHSbup9Ig

By defending the rule of law, the Constitution, T***h, apple pie, Chevrolet moms and pets, against despotic Marxis progressives, those Republicans defend the president's and all faithful Americans. Are you ready for the latest bit of Progressive love and concern? NYC is trying to ban pet stores from selling dogs, cats and rabbits. You have the option of taking home a rescue pet, which I completrly approve, but not by the imposition of government forceful overreach. Never forget that Progressives succeed by increments; a little bit of freedom (or choice) taken here, a little bit stolen there and before you realize it a huge bite of the freedom apple has been taken. They've taken much already but never fear. The core they discard contains seeds.