One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Justice...
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
Feb 1, 2020 18:32:12   #
PeterS
 
where is it when you refuse to hear the evidence!



Reply
Feb 1, 2020 18:35:52   #
Wolf counselor Loc: Heart of Texas
 
PeterS wrote:
where is it when you refuse to hear the evidence!


Have you lost your memory goober.

What about all those witnesses they questioned when the house had their inquiry ?

Are you suffering from self imposed memory loss ?

Reply
Feb 1, 2020 18:41:11   #
permafrost Loc: Minnesota
 
Wolf counselor wrote:
Have you lost your memory goober.

What about all those witnesses they questioned when the house had their inquiry ?

Are you suffering from self imposed memory loss ?




Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-TN) said that while he disapproved of Trump's actions, he'd v**e to block witnesses because 'there is no need for more evidence to prove something that has already been proven.'

Reply
 
 
Feb 1, 2020 18:47:29   #
Wolf counselor Loc: Heart of Texas
 
permafrost wrote:
Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-TN) said that while he disapproved of Trump's actions, he'd v**e to block witnesses because 'there is no need for more evidence to prove something that has already been proven.'


Get over it and move on Goober.

Trump is acquitted and there's nothing you can do about it but whine, whine, whine.

Meanwhile, Trump and us supporters continue to win, win, win.

Just like he said we would.

Reply
Feb 1, 2020 18:54:11   #
steve66613
 
Wolf counselor wrote:
Get over it and move on Goober.

Trump is acquitted and there's nothing you can do about it but whine, whine, whine.

Meanwhile, Trump and us supporters continue to win, win, win.

Just like he said we would.


Aaaaaaand......acquittal is FOREVER!

Reply
Feb 1, 2020 18:59:07   #
permafrost Loc: Minnesota
 
Wolf counselor wrote:
Get over it and move on Goober.

Trump is acquitted and there's nothing you can do about it but whine, whine, whine.

Meanwhile, Trump and us supporters continue to win, win, win.

Just like he said we would.



Well just to push a point, the trial is not yet over.. the no-removal will not be announced until maybe as late as Wednesday..

yes, we all knew from McConnell announcement a couple weeks ago that no removal would happen. did not think that even without his public comment.

But what frosts me is that i did expect an appearance of a real look into the the orange misdeeds. but no, all we got was a refusal to follow the constitution..



Reply
Feb 1, 2020 19:00:16   #
permafrost Loc: Minnesota
 
steve66613 wrote:
Aaaaaaand......acquittal is FOREVER!




I will remind Bill Clinton but I bet he knew that years ago.. in the 90s..

Reply
 
 
Feb 1, 2020 19:00:53   #
Liberty Tree
 
permafrost wrote:
Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-TN) said that while he disapproved of Trump's actions, he'd v**e to block witnesses because 'there is no need for more evidence to prove something that has already been proven.'


He also said it did not rise to the constitutional standards for removal from office. You did not mention that..

Reply
Feb 1, 2020 19:21:30   #
permafrost Loc: Minnesota
 
Liberty Tree wrote:
He also said it did not rise to the constitutional standards for removal from office. You did not mention that..


yesterday, I posted 5 threads on the incompetence of your orange loved one.

I got not a single reply to any of them.. do you guys only work on Saturday night?

Drat, eating a bowl of rocky road.. hard to do that and anything else..

but yes, he and Rubio and several others fell back on "political judgement" to rationalize no more witnesses and no removal from office.

speaks volume of the decay of the once republican party..

putting party loyalty over the constitution makes the end of our nation a very possable outcome of the trump takeover of the republican party.

A very sad and pathetic condition for any nation to be in. let alone our once wonderful country..



Reply
Feb 1, 2020 19:27:15   #
okie don
 
Biden did the 'quid pro quo', not Trump.
Things got 'hot' for the Demo's, Pelosie's son Paul ,
Kerry's step son Heintz,
Biden's son H****r.
I'm not surprised if Schritt didn't get some American Tax money from Ukraine too, if t***h be known. He got upset enuf. Lol 😁

Reply
Feb 1, 2020 19:32:32   #
okie don
 
Wonder who the Lib's are gonna run?
Bloomberg I guess.
Biden's history.
Bernie's is an out and out Marxist.
Indian Warren tells fibs.
Buttigieg has his problems being married to a man.
What a Heintz 57 bunch. Cheeeeez 😜

Reply
 
 
Feb 1, 2020 19:39:59   #
okie don
 
Wonder who the Lib's are gonna run?
Bloomberg I guess.
Biden's history.
Bernie's is an out and out Marxist.
Indian Warren tells fibs.
Buttigieg has his problems being married to a man.
What a Heintz 57 bunch. Cheeeeez 😜

Reply
Feb 1, 2020 19:57:40   #
permafrost Loc: Minnesota
 
okie don wrote:
Biden did the 'quid pro quo', not Trump.
Things got 'hot' for the Demo's, Pelosie's son Paul ,
Kerry's step son Heintz,
Biden's son H****r.
I'm not surprised if Schritt didn't get some American Tax money from Ukraine too, if t***h be known. He got upset enuf. Lol 😁



Biden was working for the countries administration on an approved national policy..

trump was doing nothing but looking for a chance to announce an investigation, true or not , into the Biden to help his probable e******n chances..

We may never see the day that republicans live as they demand others live..

placing of off spring into great positions a/c family linage is long standing in the republican party. From Supreme court justice to numerous cabinet positions the connection are seeming never ending..

and then we have the never before depth of the trump kids.. hundreds of millions in $$$ because daddy was slithered into the oval office.

so do not bother to try and spin the BS about Biden, I agree H****r should have considered appearance but never the less nothing was in violation of any law..

the trump rats on the other hand should have been under the molements law and that was simply ignored as so many other laws in the orange jerks term..




The pressure and the corruption were clear and apparent.

So…it was neither illegal nor immoral for H****r B***n to take the job, and H****r B***n did nothing illegal or immoral as a director. Thus, H****r B***n was not indicted by the Ukrainian government. If he had done something illegal or immoral, then, he would have had to have broken American law. But he didn’t, did he?

So, why is President Trump going after H****r B***n? Because he wants to get Joe Biden, and having nothing on Joe Biden- he is going after his son.



Reply
Feb 1, 2020 19:59:14   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
PeterS wrote:
where is it when you refuse to hear the evidence!


Where is it Pels kept saying they had so much??

Reply
Feb 1, 2020 20:02:42   #
permafrost Loc: Minnesota
 
okie don wrote:
Wonder who the Lib's are gonna run?
Bloomberg I guess.
Biden's history.
Bernie's is an out and out Marxist.
Indian Warren tells fibs.
Buttigieg has his problems being married to a man.
What a Heintz 57 bunch. Cheeeeez 😜




ha ha ha,,, good one okie... lord, imagine a right wing trump supporter accusing someone else of fibs.. and yet has never ending love for the most vile malicious and dependable liar in all the western world..

dang,, that is a good joke,,, gotta hand to you Okie,, caught me way off base..



Reply
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.