JediKnight wrote:
H****r is not president, in fact, he's not even a politician. Ukraine, our State Department, and the DOJ all found "nothing" regarding the false claim that H****r was somehow dirty with Burisma. So, what purpose other than distraction would be served by calling H****r to testify? Even if he did something inappropriate while working at Burisma - that has absolutely zero to do with Trump trying to extort Ukraine.
Now, on the other hand, we have heard from some of Trump's own people that Trump attempted a quid-pro-quo...and we already know why the Senate refuses to call them to testify now don't we? This current group of republicans is sad, sorry, and pathetic. They will be held accountable come November, whether Trump steals the e******n again or not. count on it.
H****r is not president, in fact, he's not even a ... (
show quote)
We have also heard from the Ukrainians that there was no quid-pro-quo.
As for accountability in November......the Dems will be the ones held accountable for the very
expensive, time-consuming fraud they called impeachment. Betting they lose the House.
promilitary wrote:
We have also heard from the Ukrainians that there was no quid-pro-quo.
As for accountability in November......the Dems will be the ones held accountable for the very
expensive, time-consuming fraud they called impeachment. Betting they lose the House.
Considering that the Ukrainians NEED our cash - what would you expect them to say?
Not that it matters, but even the summarized memo that Trump put out about his "perfect call" clearly shows an attempt at quid-pro-quo -which of course is illegal by our laws.
So once again, what does H****r B***n working at Burisma have to do with Trump's impeachment? nothing. nothing at all. period.
JediKnight wrote:
Considering that the Ukrainians NEED our cash - what would you expect them to say?
Not that it matters, but even the summarized memo that Trump put out about his "perfect call" clearly shows an attempt at quid-pro-quo -which of course is illegal by our laws.
So once again, what does H****r B***n working at Burisma have to do with Trump's impeachment? nothing. nothing at all. period.
And they got our cash on time. Don't worry, H****r will be called before the Senate.
JediKnight wrote:
H****r is not president, in fact, he's not even a politician. Ukraine, our State Department, and the DOJ all found "nothing" regarding the false claim that H****r was somehow dirty with Burisma.
And where, praytell, is the OFFICIAL documentation of that? When and where did this absolving occur?
There
isn't any. You're just repeating the
opinions of numbnuts blathering on your propaganda-porn news agencies who've spent so much time lying to cover for the establishment they have no choice but continue.
Quote:
So, what purpose other than distraction would be served by calling H****r to testify? Even if he did something inappropriate while working at Burisma - that has absolutely zero to do with Trump trying to extort Ukraine.
Little. He would take the 5th immediately.
Quote:
Now, on the other hand, we have heard from some of Trump's own people that Trump attempted a quid-pro-quo...
Attempted...and who are "Trump's own people"?
Quote:
and we already know why the Senate refuses to call them to testify now don't we?
Why didn't the House dips**ts do it? It was
their job. Do you know
anything?Besides, what would that accomplish? Every time there's some televised hearing they use "classified" as an excuse to not say anything.
Quote:
This current group of republicans is sad, sorry, and pathetic. They will be held accountable come November, whether Trump steals the e******n again or not. count on it.
Think so? I think the Republicans will win the House back. I think the Dems (and g*******t Republicans) have waaay overplayed their hand and the reason you don't know that is you prefer to be lied to and told what to think.
amadjuster wrote:
And they got our cash on time. Don't worry, H****r will be called before the Senate.
They got the cash because Trump got caught.
IF H****r is called before the Senate, he should do exactly what Trump's people do: refuse to comply. They have no evidence of wrongdoing at all, so why even bother?
Perhaps you remember hearing: "what's good for the goose is often good for the gander."
If I were H****r, I would tell the republicans exactly where they could go with their lies and fairy tales.
JediKnight wrote:
H****r is not president, in fact, he's not even a politician. Ukraine, our State Department, and the DOJ all found "nothing" regarding the false claim that H****r was somehow dirty with Burisma. So, what purpose other than distraction would be served by calling H****r to testify? Even if he did something inappropriate while working at Burisma - that has absolutely zero to do with Trump trying to extort Ukraine.
Now, on the other hand, we have heard from some of Trump's own people that Trump attempted a quid-pro-quo...and we already know why the Senate refuses to call them to testify now don't we? This current group of republicans is sad, sorry, and pathetic. They will be held accountable come November, whether Trump steals the e******n again or not. count on it.
H****r is not president, in fact, he's not even a ... (
show quote)
We've heard that they thought, heard, understood or assumed he wanted a quid pro quo. But his own words were, no quid quo pro, although it's not illegal, especially if corruption is in the balance.
Any way, just wait and see.
BigMike wrote:
Think so? I think the Republicans will win the House back. I think the Dems (and g*******t Republicans) have waaay overplayed their hand and the reason you don't know that is you prefer to be lied to and told what to think.
You can find documentation right here:
businessinsider.com › ukraine-gas-company-burisma-holdings-j...
Burisma, the Ukrainian gas company tied to Joe Biden's son ...
3 days ago - During a July 25 phone call, Trump urged Ukraine's president to launch investigations into former Vice President Joe Biden and his son, H****r ...
nwtk2007 wrote:
We've heard that they thought, heard, understood or assumed he wanted a quid pro quo. But his own words were, no quid quo pro, although it's not illegal, especially if corruption is in the balance.
Any way, just wait and see.
Do you know why we have a State Department and DOJ? In case you don't, they are the departments that handle investigations of foreign governments suspected of wrong doing like corruption. The president does not investigate corruption. period.
Have you noticed that since telling that lie, you haven't heard of even one investigation into the so called rampant corruption in Ukraine? Now, why do you suppose that is?
Just because Trump and his minions claim "quid pro" is not illegal does not make it so. According to the Constitution - it is illegal. In fact, even our campaign laws say 'a candidate cannot accept any gifts in kind from a foreign government or citizen' which use results in a campaign contribution. So, Trump asking Ukraine to investigate a political opponent is asking for a contribution to his own e******n. ILLEGAL as hell!
JediKnight wrote:
Information is power -when used properly.
You have no power. Only a keyboard, and a light saber with dead batteries.
archie bunker wrote:
You have no power. Only a keyboard, and a light saber with dead batteries.
not what your wife tells me!
JediKnight wrote:
not what your wife tells me!
What does she tell you, o warrior of the skies?
JediKnight wrote:
They got the cash because Trump got caught.
IF H****r is called before the Senate, he should do exactly what Trump's people do: refuse to comply. They have no evidence of wrongdoing at all, so why even bother?
Perhaps you remember hearing: "what's good for the goose is often good for the gander."
If I were H****r, I would tell the republicans exactly where they could go with their lies and fairy tales.
They got the cash because Trump got caught. br b... (
show quote)
Delusional! Very sad. You'll see I'm right before the e******n. Your guys make a lot of noise but seem short on results.
JediKnight wrote:
Considering that the Ukrainians NEED our cash - what would you expect them to say?
Not that it matters, but even the summarized memo that Trump put out about his "perfect call" clearly shows an attempt at quid-pro-quo -which of course is illegal by our laws.
So once again, what does H****r B***n working at Burisma have to do with Trump's impeachment? nothing. nothing at all. period.
Nope, not an argument that works1
archie bunker wrote:
What does she tell you, o warrior of the skies?
That's private....you don't have a need to know!
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.