Headlines driven by an anonymous leak. Absurd!
Jan 28, 2020 11:17:55 #
nwtk2007 wrote:
You could be right, especially if Schiff is the one who composed the whistleblower complaint, then it is in his own mind and a figment of his imagination.
There has to be a way to get rid of this guy. His district is Hollywood. v**ed on by people who only speak from scripts. His constitutes probably don't even know who he is.
Jan 28, 2020 13:27:57 #
Weewillynobeerspilly wrote:
It was exposed pretty well under the moon cricket obammy, that's how the greatest President of all time took office a few years ago TRUMP!!.......cant wait for Trump to start leaking obammy and Hillary docs.
Bet you sing a different tune...still be a show tune, just different
You must be out of meth, what you wrote was almost coherent......stupid, but coherent.
Bet you sing a different tune...still be a show tune, just different
You must be out of meth, what you wrote was almost coherent......stupid, but coherent.
Bravo!
Jan 28, 2020 14:09:01 #
nwtk2007 wrote:
This is what our media is all about. Look at all ... (show quote)
But then how about when they prove out? The GOP would like to stop at the reasonable doubt without bringing out evidence and witnesses that either prove or disprove it. Fine if you want to say something isnt proved, but do everything possible to then prove or disprove of it, meaning cooperate with investigations.
Jan 28, 2020 14:11:40 #
nwtk2007
Loc: Texas
woodguru wrote:
But then how about when they prove out? The GOP would like to stop at the reasonable doubt without bringing out evidence and witnesses that either prove or disprove it. Fine if you want to say something isnt proved, but do everything possible to then prove or disprove of it, meaning cooperate with investigations.
Give us some examples.
Jan 28, 2020 14:20:28 #
woodguru wrote:
But then how about when they prove out? The GOP would like to stop at the reasonable doubt without bringing out evidence and witnesses that either prove or disprove it. Fine if you want to say something isnt proved, but do everything possible to then prove or disprove of it, meaning cooperate with investigations.
As schiff did in the House investigation?
Jan 29, 2020 01:59:49 #
nwtk2007 wrote:
This is what our media is all about. Look at all ... (show quote)
Nothing "bombshell" about it. At worst President Trump said he would like to withhold aid, (until he knew all about, or at least enough to make sure the same corruption wasn't ongoing,) the corruption and abuse of power that was OBVIOUS between Joe Biden and the former corrupt Ukrainian government. MOST Americans would like this abject corruption, abuse of power, selling of influence, and personally enriching themselves by the Bidens investigated and exposed. It makes NO difference what President Trump said to Bolton, (he may have said nothing at all,) all that matters is what President Trump DID. Which was release the aid, (ahead of schedule,) with no pressure on the Ukrainian president and no conditions. I guess since the Democrat/socialists are creepy, underhanded, lying, c***ting opportunists who abuse their positions to enrich themselves, (donations to the Clinton foundation dried up when she wasn't able to c***t her way into office,)when they have authority, they assume everyone is like they are. I have noticed that everything they have accused President Trump of doing, is exactly what they themselves have done, and worse.
Jan 29, 2020 12:00:52 #
Ricktloml wrote:
Nothing "bombshell" about it. At worst ... (show quote)
Now all we have to do, is make them pay for it..........
Jan 29, 2020 12:21:32 #
nwtk2007
Loc: Texas
Ricktloml wrote:
Nothing "bombshell" about it. At worst ... (show quote)
I think Trump may well have said he's like to withhold millitary aid until Ukraine proved they were going to investigate, but he obviously changed his mind. They think wanting to do something is the same as intent.
I guess that since I'd like to rob a bank so I could have a lot of money is intent to rob the back! LOL! They even say he changed his mind when he got "caught." Was I "caught" went someone told by I would go to jail if I robbed a bank? Even if he wanted to do it and even if for the reason they claim, he changed his mind and didn't. However, if it turns out that the Biden's are as dirty as they appear to be, it kind of justifies Trumps actions.
Bottom line is that most likely, all Bolton could claim is that Trump wanted to withhold military aid to Ukraine but instead, without Ukraine even having a clue about it, he elected to release the aid.
What they have is Trump guilty of a "thought" crime, at best.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.