nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

I don't subscribe to the WSJ and they require money to read their "stuff" but, I did hear they have an article about how the dems haven't been able to show criminality in the efforts of leadership to "coerce" other governments, since there is none. What they DID say was that the dems, because of that, they would have to show it was coercion for corrupt reasons; personal gain and they admit that all presidents in all of their efforts are seeking personal political gain, so how does one prove that Trump is more extraordinary in that regard and warrants removal??

If someone can cut and paste the article, maybe we could get clarity on their view.

Carol Kelly

I do get some stuff from WSJ, but I can’t cut and paste. Someone else will, I’m sure.
Obama certainly used the office to his financial advantage and loaded us with socialist judges, etc all over the place and enough Muslims to eventually take us down.

2bltap Loc: Move to the Mainland

What continues to be left out of damn near every conversation pertaining to this issue is that Bill Clinton himself signed onto a deal with the Ukraine government to do exactly what President Trump is doing with regards to assisting each other with investigating corruption between our two countries. Now why is that?
Semper Fi
Mike

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

We know why. I am pretty sure Ukraine is investigating and have information.