One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Trump Removes Pollution Controls on Streams and Wetlands
Page <<first <prev 4 of 4
Jan 26, 2020 09:16:21   #
moldyoldy
 
Navigator wrote:
Your post is wildly inaccurate as is the MSM reporting on this issue where your brainwashed self undoubtedly obtained your information.


Maybe you should investigate

Reply
Jan 26, 2020 09:36:33   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
moldyoldy wrote:
The new water rule will remove federal protections from more than half the nation’s wetlands, and hundreds of thousands of small waterways. That would for the first time in decades allow landowners and property developers to dump pollutants such as pesticides and fertilizers directly into many of those waterways, and to destroy or fill in wetlands for construction projects.
“This will be the biggest loss of clean water protection the country has ever seen,” said Blan Holman, a lawyer specializing in federal water policy at the Southern Environmental Law Center. “This puts drinking water for millions of Americans at risk of contamination from unregulated pollution. This is not just undoing the Obama rule. This is stripping away protections that were put in place in the ’70s and ’80s that Americans have relied on for their health.”
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/trump-removes-pollution-controls-on-streams-and-wetlands/ar-BBZeL7l?ocid=spartandhp
The new water rule will remove federal protections... (show quote)


I’ll start by saying I do have concerns over this, mixed feelings.. Our water is terrible to drink even with the present day restrictions..
The EPA had failed in this regard too..

The over reach by government has got to stop!! Let the states Set and enforce the rules governing all companies relative to waste or dumping or anything else. They have better regulatory control than the federal government which is a mass order unattainable by say farmers etc... The state can fine, issue clean up orders and or shut down businesses ..

Not all is lost in The new rule, written by the “Environmental Protection Agency and the Army Corps of Engineers, will retain federal protections of large bodies of water, as well as larger rivers and streams that flow into them and wetlands that lie adjacent to them. But it removes protections for many other waters, including wetlands that are not adjacent to large bodies of water, some seasonal streams that flow for only a portion of the year, “ephemeral” streams that only flow after rainstorms, and water that temporarily flows through underground passages.”

Reply
Jan 26, 2020 09:42:46   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
A perfect example of the failed EPA~~They created the polluted water here in Colorado and have fought clean up for years even sfter losing the lawsuit...

A gold company said the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is mismanaging the Superfund cleanup of nearly 50 old mining sites in southwestern Colorado and should be removed as the agency in charge.

Sunnyside Gold Corp., which owns mining property in the Bonita Peak Superfund district, made the complaint Monday in a letter to the EPA. In a written statement Tuesday, the EPA said it is following Superfund laws and is conducting a thorough investigation and cleanup.

The exchange was the latest skirmish in a long-running battle between Sunnyside and the EPA over the cleanup. The EPA has targeted Sunnyside to help pay for the cleanup, and the company has resisted, launching multiple challenges to the size and management of the project.

The West’s Old Mining Legacy Still Shows Up In Tainted Waters Today
Sunnyside's letter said the EPA has a conflict of interest because the agency was responsible for a massive spill of polluted water in 2015 from the Gold King Mine, another site in the Superfund district.

https://apnews.com/8770e53018d546b4962ae8b650139152

Reply
 
 
Jan 26, 2020 09:55:36   #
moldyoldy
 
lindajoy wrote:
A perfect example of the failed EPA~~They created the polluted water here in Colorado and have fought clean up for years even sfter losing the lawsuit...

A gold company said the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is mismanaging the Superfund cleanup of nearly 50 old mining sites in southwestern Colorado and should be removed as the agency in charge.

Sunnyside Gold Corp., which owns mining property in the Bonita Peak Superfund district, made the complaint Monday in a letter to the EPA. In a written statement Tuesday, the EPA said it is following Superfund laws and is conducting a thorough investigation and cleanup.

The exchange was the latest skirmish in a long-running battle between Sunnyside and the EPA over the cleanup. The EPA has targeted Sunnyside to help pay for the cleanup, and the company has resisted, launching multiple challenges to the size and management of the project.

The West’s Old Mining Legacy Still Shows Up In Tainted Waters Today
Sunnyside's letter said the EPA has a conflict of interest because the agency was responsible for a massive spill of polluted water in 2015 from the Gold King Mine, another site in the Superfund district.

https://apnews.com/8770e53018d546b4962ae8b650139152
A perfect example of the failed EPA~~They created ... (show quote)



All of the digging into the ground has caused pollution for centuries. Including dumping nuclear waste. Cleaning it up is likely impossible, containing it has failed. Allowing more is i***tic. Thanks for your input

Reply
Jan 26, 2020 10:36:25   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
moldyoldy wrote:
All of the digging into the ground has caused pollution for centuries. Including dumping nuclear waste. Cleaning it up is likely impossible, containing it has failed. Allowing more is i***tic. Thanks for your input


If states enforce the laws on the book in their state then more should not become an issue..

We don't need government overreach, we need states to enforce Those businesses involved..

I want clean air, water and land too..
Its our responsibility to hold our states not government to ensure its done... As your article points out its not removal of all waters.

Thank You for your opinion too...

Reply
Jan 26, 2020 11:26:23   #
moldyoldy
 
lindajoy wrote:
If states enforce the laws on the book in their state then more should not become an issue..

We don't need government overreach, we need states to enforce Those businesses involved..

I want clean air, water and land too..
Its our responsibility to hold our states not government to ensure its done... As your article points out its not removal of all waters.

Thank You for your opinion too...


Whether state or federal big business with big money will sway our politicians. It all comes back to getting rid of lobbyists and PACs

Reply
Jan 26, 2020 11:40:14   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
moldyoldy wrote:
Whether state or federal big business with big money will sway our politicians. It all comes back to getting rid of lobbyists and PACs


Amen to that moldy!!!! Fully support this too!!!👍👍😉🙏🙏👏🏻👏🏻

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 4
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.