This is essentially why Obama didn't resist Russia with anything more than economic sanctions and no weapons. Trump supplied arms to simply be preventive of Russia coming further west in Ukraine which they have never indicated they would. There is really not much our military aid has actually done but provide military insurance for Ukraine. We have, essentially, supplied their military, nothing more. The only fighting is small pockets of "resistance" not actually intended to prevent the Russian take over, which we could not prevent if they decided to take Ukraine totally. What little resistance there is is not supported by the Eastern Ukraine people and certainly not by the Crimean people, who actually v**ed to be "Russian."
These regions have been Russian for a long time and are filled with Russian nationals.
I dare say that if Texas and California are allowed to continue to be over run by southern immigrants for a long enough period of time and if Mexico was a fairly powerful nation, we might see California and Texas elect to become Mexican once again. Long story short, the significance of this military aid is way over stated and I suspect is a source of some enrichment of many here in the states. The idea to follow the money might be very interesting, indeed, in Ukraine.
I have been listening to the stories of Shokin and the other "corrupt" investigators as presented by the democrats today and at least as far as Shokin is concern, this directly contradict what Shokins and the president of Ukraine claim. It makes me wonder even more what Joe Biden was providing to Ukraine and Burisma such that they would launder money to him through his son H****r.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.