One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
A sad state of the DemocRats
Page 1 of 2 next>
Jan 22, 2020 09:40:43   #
MR Mister Loc: Washington DC
 
Monday on the radio, LevinTV host Mark Levin criticized media pundits for discussing the impeachment articles against President Trump seemingly without any idea of what’s required to impeach a president or the separation-of-powers battle that’s at the heart of this politically motivated impeachment.

“I think part of the problem we have, ladies and gentlemen, is most of the people commenting on impeachment have no idea what they’re talking about. Have not studied the subject in any significant way,” Levin said.

Levin described how during the Clinton impeachment trial in the late 1990s, he studied President Andrew Johnson’s impeachment trial in-depth to understand the process, the Constitution’s requirements for impeachment, and the case against President Johnson and how it informed what was happening to President Bill Clinton.

“People are comparing the Clinton impeachment to the Trump impeachment,” Levin said. Setting the record straight, before Trump’s trial begins in the Senate, Levin defended President Trump from the accusations thrown against him by Democrats and the media and explained how Johnson’s impeachment trial is essential to understanding what’s happening to Trump.

“This is an assault by the Democrats on the Constitution, on the power and independence of the presidency. It is an assault on the separation of powers,” Levin said.

“This is a disgrace.”

It would be fitting for all the Dems in DC to wear a Swastika.

Reply
Jan 22, 2020 09:58:20   #
Liberty Tree
 
MR Mister wrote:
Monday on the radio, LevinTV host Mark Levin criticized media pundits for discussing the impeachment articles against President Trump seemingly without any idea of what’s required to impeach a president or the separation-of-powers battle that’s at the heart of this politically motivated impeachment.

“I think part of the problem we have, ladies and gentlemen, is most of the people commenting on impeachment have no idea what they’re talking about. Have not studied the subject in any significant way,” Levin said.

Levin described how during the Clinton impeachment trial in the late 1990s, he studied President Andrew Johnson’s impeachment trial in-depth to understand the process, the Constitution’s requirements for impeachment, and the case against President Johnson and how it informed what was happening to President Bill Clinton.

“People are comparing the Clinton impeachment to the Trump impeachment,” Levin said. Setting the record straight, before Trump’s trial begins in the Senate, Levin defended President Trump from the accusations thrown against him by Democrats and the media and explained how Johnson’s impeachment trial is essential to understanding what’s happening to Trump.

“This is an assault by the Democrats on the Constitution, on the power and independence of the presidency. It is an assault on the separation of powers,” Levin said.

“This is a disgrace.”

It would be fitting for all the Dems in DC to wear a Swastika.
Monday on the radio, LevinTV host Mark Levin criti... (show quote)


Most are getting their news from.the MSM so of course they are only getting Democrat spin.

Reply
Jan 22, 2020 11:04:52   #
working class stiff Loc: N. Carolina
 
MR Mister wrote:
Monday on the radio, LevinTV host Mark Levin criticized media pundits for discussing the impeachment articles against President Trump seemingly without any idea of what’s required to impeach a president or the separation-of-powers battle that’s at the heart of this politically motivated impeachment.

“I think part of the problem we have, ladies and gentlemen, is most of the people commenting on impeachment have no idea what they’re talking about. Have not studied the subject in any significant way,” Levin said.

Levin described how during the Clinton impeachment trial in the late 1990s, he studied President Andrew Johnson’s impeachment trial in-depth to understand the process, the Constitution’s requirements for impeachment, and the case against President Johnson and how it informed what was happening to President Bill Clinton.

“People are comparing the Clinton impeachment to the Trump impeachment,” Levin said. Setting the record straight, before Trump’s trial begins in the Senate, Levin defended President Trump from the accusations thrown against him by Democrats and the media and explained how Johnson’s impeachment trial is essential to understanding what’s happening to Trump.

“This is an assault by the Democrats on the Constitution, on the power and independence of the presidency. It is an assault on the separation of powers,” Levin said.

“This is a disgrace.”

It would be fitting for all the Dems in DC to wear a Swastika.
Monday on the radio, LevinTV host Mark Levin criti... (show quote)


“This is an assault by the Democrats on the Constitution, on the power and independence of the presidency. It is an assault on the separation of powers,” Levin said.

I have a slightly different take on that matter.

Republicans and Trump supporters do not own the Constitution.
The House was set up as the representatives of the people. The House reflects the fact that most people don't support the Trump administration. The House members are, in fact, discharging their Constitutional functions. They are putting the brakes on an administration that seeks to govern as though it has a mandate when it does not have such a mandate.

The Presidency is not an independent government with unlimited independence and powers. It is a third of our government. The powers and independence of the Presidency are checked by the Congress and Supreme Court. Far from being an assault on the separation of powers, this impeachment is an assertion of the power of the House, and Congress in general, to reign in an executive who asserts he has unlimited power and independence. The possibility that the Presidency might not answer to Congress is exactly why the power to impeach was put into the Constitution.

Far from being a disgrace, the government is functioning the way it was designed by the Constitution. The country is divided, therefore the government is divided. Calling the Dems n**is does nothing to alter the fact that they represent the people reminding the administration that it does not have a mandate, nor even popular support.

From the lies about the size of the inauguration crowd to the recent photo of an altered county e******n map on his desk, this President has fooled himself about his popular support. The impeachment is a check on that illusion.

Reply
Jan 22, 2020 11:07:28   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
working class stiff wrote:
“This is an assault by the Democrats on the Constitution, on the power and independence of the presidency. It is an assault on the separation of powers,” Levin said.

I have a slightly different take on that matter.

Republicans and Trump supporters do not own the Constitution.
The House was set up as the representatives of the people. The House reflects the fact that most people don't support the Trump administration. The House members are, in fact, discharging their Constitutional functions. They are putting the brakes on an administration that seeks to govern as though it has a mandate when it does not have such a mandate.

The Presidency is not an independent government with unlimited independence and powers. It is a third of our government. The powers and independence of the Presidency are checked by the Congress and Supreme Court. Far from being an assault on the separation of powers, this impeachment is an assertion of the power of the House, and Congress in general, to reign in an executive who asserts he has unlimited power and independence. The possibility that the Presidency might not answer to Congress is exactly why the power to impeach was put into the Constitution.

Far from being a disgrace, the government is functioning the way it was designed by the Constitution. The country is divided, therefore the government is divided. Calling the Dems n**is does nothing to alter the fact that they represent the people reminding the administration that it does not have a mandate, nor even popular support.

From the lies about the size of the inauguration crowd to the recent photo of an altered county e******n map on his desk, this President has fooled himself about his popular support. The impeachment is a check on that illusion.
“This is an assault by the Democrats on the Consti... (show quote)


If this were a bipartisan impeachment and there were actual crimes committed, I'd agree with you. However, . . . .

Reply
Jan 22, 2020 13:01:46   #
MR Mister Loc: Washington DC
 
working class stiff wrote:
“This is an assault by the Democrats on the Constitution, on the power and independence of the presidency. It is an assault on the separation of powers,” Levin said.

I have a slightly different take on that matter.

Republicans and Trump supporters do not own the Constitution.
The House was set up as the representatives of the people. The House reflects the fact that most people don't support the Trump administration. The House members are, in fact, discharging their Constitutional functions. They are putting the brakes on an administration that seeks to govern as though it has a mandate when it does not have such a mandate.

The Presidency is not an independent government with unlimited independence and powers. It is a third of our government. The powers and independence of the Presidency are checked by the Congress and Supreme Court. Far from being an assault on the separation of powers, this impeachment is an assertion of the power of the House, and Congress in general, to reign in an executive who asserts he has unlimited power and independence. The possibility that the Presidency might not answer to Congress is exactly why the power to impeach was put into the Constitution.

Far from being a disgrace, the government is functioning the way it was designed by the Constitution. The country is divided, therefore the government is divided. Calling the Dems n**is does nothing to alter the fact that they represent the people reminding the administration that it does not have a mandate, nor even popular support.

From the lies about the size of the inauguration crowd to the recent photo of an altered county e******n map on his desk, this President has fooled himself about his popular support. The impeachment is a check on that illusion.
“This is an assault by the Democrats on the Consti... (show quote)


What you describe was once a fact. But not today, today our country has been blinded by words that say
"you can get a free college education and help from the government if you v**e for me and my party"
And it was working until Trump came along, in just a few years, 50 years of Democrat work bit the dust.
Now the Dems are in panic mode, only hope for them is to take him out of office or k**l him.

Reply
Jan 23, 2020 08:56:49   #
Big Kahuna
 
MR Mister wrote:
Monday on the radio, LevinTV host Mark Levin criticized media pundits for discussing the impeachment articles against President Trump seemingly without any idea of what’s required to impeach a president or the separation-of-powers battle that’s at the heart of this politically motivated impeachment.

“I think part of the problem we have, ladies and gentlemen, is most of the people commenting on impeachment have no idea what they’re talking about. Have not studied the subject in any significant way,” Levin said.

Levin described how during the Clinton impeachment trial in the late 1990s, he studied President Andrew Johnson’s impeachment trial in-depth to understand the process, the Constitution’s requirements for impeachment, and the case against President Johnson and how it informed what was happening to President Bill Clinton.

“People are comparing the Clinton impeachment to the Trump impeachment,” Levin said. Setting the record straight, before Trump’s trial begins in the Senate, Levin defended President Trump from the accusations thrown against him by Democrats and the media and explained how Johnson’s impeachment trial is essential to understanding what’s happening to Trump.

“This is an assault by the Democrats on the Constitution, on the power and independence of the presidency. It is an assault on the separation of powers,” Levin said.

“This is a disgrace.”

It would be fitting for all the Dems in DC to wear a Swastika.
Monday on the radio, LevinTV host Mark Levin criti... (show quote)


All demonrats should be required to wear swastikas in the US. All conservatives could wear the American f**g, a gun emblem and a patriot symbol to denote liberty and American values. We should know our enemies and all demorats are becoming our enemies.

Reply
Jan 23, 2020 08:58:20   #
Big Kahuna
 
working class stiff wrote:
“This is an assault by the Democrats on the Constitution, on the power and independence of the presidency. It is an assault on the separation of powers,” Levin said.

I have a slightly different take on that matter.

Republicans and Trump supporters do not own the Constitution.
The House was set up as the representatives of the people. The House reflects the fact that most people don't support the Trump administration. The House members are, in fact, discharging their Constitutional functions. They are putting the brakes on an administration that seeks to govern as though it has a mandate when it does not have such a mandate.

The Presidency is not an independent government with unlimited independence and powers. It is a third of our government. The powers and independence of the Presidency are checked by the Congress and Supreme Court. Far from being an assault on the separation of powers, this impeachment is an assertion of the power of the House, and Congress in general, to reign in an executive who asserts he has unlimited power and independence. The possibility that the Presidency might not answer to Congress is exactly why the power to impeach was put into the Constitution.

Far from being a disgrace, the government is functioning the way it was designed by the Constitution. The country is divided, therefore the government is divided. Calling the Dems n**is does nothing to alter the fact that they represent the people reminding the administration that it does not have a mandate, nor even popular support.

From the lies about the size of the inauguration crowd to the recent photo of an altered county e******n map on his desk, this President has fooled himself about his popular support. The impeachment is a check on that illusion.
“This is an assault by the Democrats on the Consti... (show quote)


You should be wearing a swastika. Get one from the demonrat party and wear it proudly.

Reply
Jan 23, 2020 09:00:17   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
MR Mister wrote:
Monday on the radio, LevinTV host Mark Levin criticized media pundits for discussing the impeachment articles against President Trump seemingly without any idea of what’s required to impeach a president or the separation-of-powers battle that’s at the heart of this politically motivated impeachment.

“I think part of the problem we have, ladies and gentlemen, is most of the people commenting on impeachment have no idea what they’re talking about. Have not studied the subject in any significant way,” Levin said.

Levin described how during the Clinton impeachment trial in the late 1990s, he studied President Andrew Johnson’s impeachment trial in-depth to understand the process, the Constitution’s requirements for impeachment, and the case against President Johnson and how it informed what was happening to President Bill Clinton.

“People are comparing the Clinton impeachment to the Trump impeachment,” Levin said. Setting the record straight, before Trump’s trial begins in the Senate, Levin defended President Trump from the accusations thrown against him by Democrats and the media and explained how Johnson’s impeachment trial is essential to understanding what’s happening to Trump.

“This is an assault by the Democrats on the Constitution, on the power and independence of the presidency. It is an assault on the separation of powers,” Levin said.

“This is a disgrace.”

It would be fitting for all the Dems in DC to wear a Swastika.
Monday on the radio, LevinTV host Mark Levin criti... (show quote)


Sums it up right here.:
This is an assault by the Democrats on the Constitution, on the power and independence of the presidency. It is an assault on the separation of powers,” Levin said.

“This is a disgrace.”

Reply
Jan 23, 2020 09:01:51   #
Big Kahuna
 
MR Mister wrote:
What you describe was once a fact. But not today, today our country has been blinded by words that say
"you can get a free college education and help from the government if you v**e for me and my party"
And it was working until Trump came along, in just a few years, 50 years of Democrat work bit the dust.
Now the Dems are in panic mode, only hope for them is to take him out of office or k**l him.


The demonrat party is handing out swastikas. Have they mailed you one yet? Wear it proudly.

Reply
Jan 23, 2020 09:06:28   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
working class stiff wrote:
“This is an assault by the Democrats on the Constitution, on the power and independence of the presidency. It is an assault on the separation of powers,” Levin said.

I have a slightly different take on that matter.

Republicans and Trump supporters do not own the Constitution.
The House was set up as the representatives of the people. The House reflects the fact that most people don't support the Trump administration. The House members are, in fact, discharging their Constitutional functions. They are putting the brakes on an administration that seeks to govern as though it has a mandate when it does not have such a mandate.

The Presidency is not an independent government with unlimited independence and powers. It is a third of our government. The powers and independence of the Presidency are checked by the Congress and Supreme Court. Far from being an assault on the separation of powers, this impeachment is an assertion of the power of the House, and Congress in general, to reign in an executive who asserts he has unlimited power and independence. The possibility that the Presidency might not answer to Congress is exactly why the power to impeach was put into the Constitution.

Far from being a disgrace, the government is functioning the way it was designed by the Constitution. The country is divided, therefore the government is divided. Calling the Dems n**is does nothing to alter the fact that they represent the people reminding the administration that it does not have a mandate, nor even popular support.

From the lies about the size of the inauguration crowd to the recent photo of an altered county e******n map on his desk, this President has fooled himself about his popular support. The impeachment is a check on that illusion.
“This is an assault by the Democrats on the Consti... (show quote)


You left out the part of the Senates sole role of power governing the Impeachment process and it being the finder of “ fact” ~~ Not subject to hear say as a form of clear and convincing evidence...To the contrary it is their duty to throw out such inference.~~

Reply
Jan 23, 2020 09:48:33   #
MR Mister Loc: Washington DC
 
working class stiff wrote:
“This is an assault by the Democrats on the Constitution, on the power and independence of the presidency. It is an assault on the separation of powers,” Levin said.

I have a slightly different take on that matter.

Republicans and Trump supporters do not own the Constitution.
The House was set up as the representatives of the people. The House reflects the fact that most people don't support the Trump administration. The House members are, in fact, discharging their Constitutional functions. They are putting the brakes on an administration that seeks to govern as though it has a mandate when it does not have such a mandate.

The Presidency is not an independent government with unlimited independence and powers. It is a third of our government. The powers and independence of the Presidency are checked by the Congress and Supreme Court. Far from being an assault on the separation of powers, this impeachment is an assertion of the power of the House, and Congress in general, to reign in an executive who asserts he has unlimited power and independence. The possibility that the Presidency might not answer to Congress is exactly why the power to impeach was put into the Constitution.

Far from being a disgrace, the government is functioning the way it was designed by the Constitution. The country is divided, therefore the government is divided. Calling the Dems n**is does nothing to alter the fact that they represent the people reminding the administration that it does not have a mandate, nor even popular support.

From the lies about the size of the inauguration crowd to the recent photo of an altered county e******n map on his desk, this President has fooled himself about his popular support. The impeachment is a check on that illusion.
“This is an assault by the Democrats on the Consti... (show quote)


Perhaps you miss his rallies where thousands have to stand outside do to the fact the building only holds 30,000 people.!! So, how unpopular is he?

Reply
 
 
Jan 23, 2020 09:52:22   #
MR Mister Loc: Washington DC
 
drlarrygino wrote:
The demonrat party is handing out swastikas. Have they mailed you one yet? Wear it proudly.


Let me tell you something, there was a time where I put 30 cal holes in swastikas that stood and walked toward me. I guess I missed you.

Reply
Jan 23, 2020 10:51:46   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
lindajoy wrote:
You left out the part of the Senates sole role of power governing the Impeachment process and it being the finder of “ fact” ~~ Not subject to hear say as a form of clear and convincing evidence...To the contrary it is their duty to throw out such inference.~~


But Linda, it's all the dems could come up with in the "discovery" inquiries! The dem's ended it so they must have thought there was simply no more evidence? Time to throw this thing where it belongs, in the garbage where the rest of the democrat screw ups have gone!!

Reply
Jan 23, 2020 11:04:06   #
working class stiff Loc: N. Carolina
 
lindajoy wrote:
You left out the part of the Senates sole role of power governing the Impeachment process and it being the finder of “ fact” ~~ Not subject to hear say as a form of clear and convincing evidence...To the contrary it is their duty to throw out such inference.~~


You're right, I did. In this particular case the Senate role makes analysis more complicated. I was trying to get to the larger point that Congress has ceded a lot of it's powers to the Executive. That Congress is divided does throw a twist into the situation.

In a political environment as polarized as we are, making the argument that the House is acting within the Constitution to assert it's rights is a thankless task. My post wasn't really about the impeachment, it's processes, or outcome. Just as I think of the Trump administration as an outcome of forces larger than Mr. Trump, I view the House impeachment the same way.

We have been down this road before. An administration that asserts that if the President does it, it's legal.
And an inevitable response of impeachment.

Reply
Jan 23, 2020 11:19:19   #
bahmer
 
MR Mister wrote:
Monday on the radio, LevinTV host Mark Levin criticized media pundits for discussing the impeachment articles against President Trump seemingly without any idea of what’s required to impeach a president or the separation-of-powers battle that’s at the heart of this politically motivated impeachment.

“I think part of the problem we have, ladies and gentlemen, is most of the people commenting on impeachment have no idea what they’re talking about. Have not studied the subject in any significant way,” Levin said.

Levin described how during the Clinton impeachment trial in the late 1990s, he studied President Andrew Johnson’s impeachment trial in-depth to understand the process, the Constitution’s requirements for impeachment, and the case against President Johnson and how it informed what was happening to President Bill Clinton.

“People are comparing the Clinton impeachment to the Trump impeachment,” Levin said. Setting the record straight, before Trump’s trial begins in the Senate, Levin defended President Trump from the accusations thrown against him by Democrats and the media and explained how Johnson’s impeachment trial is essential to understanding what’s happening to Trump.

“This is an assault by the Democrats on the Constitution, on the power and independence of the presidency. It is an assault on the separation of powers,” Levin said.

“This is a disgrace.”

It would be fitting for all the Dems in DC to wear a Swastika.
Monday on the radio, LevinTV host Mark Levin criti... (show quote)


Amen and Amen

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.