Big Kahuna

I would love to hear sloJoe, cocaine sniffer h****r, joe' s extorting brother, the f**e FISA initiator and inept B******i fiasco initiator, hitlery rotten clinton and the most corrupt islamic ex-President , in our history, bathhouse barry ovommit, put under oath and have to testify about their attempts to collude, destroy, extort and take down our country and make it a 3rd world hell hole. When real justice has been served, these t*****rs should be executed at Gitmo for being the t*****rs that they are.

Tug484

I'm with you on that.

F.D.R.

C'mon really? Are you that blind? Democrats haven't presented any 'crimes' or factual evidence. What they gave is opinion and supposition about what THEY felt was 'wrong' nothing else. Now they're trying to convince us that we should also feel it was wrong. Sorry, but it's not working.

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

They claim the evidence is over whelming and undeniable and uncontested. Why do they need to gather more when they claim they have all they need?

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

And all fishing trips must come to an end!

tbutkovich

All they get when they go on their fishing trip is “More Whoppers aka More Lies!”

Lt. Rob Polans ret.

Well if you call this t***h,
BREAKING: New Documents Prove Adam Schiff Mischaracterized Key Piece Of Evidence
190.9K Views Share
Clayton Keirns
Follow Clayton Keirns
Posted January 22, 2020 in Politics

The liberal news media leaped for joy last week when they believed they had the "smoking gun" evidence against Donald Trump - a note from Rudy Giuliani that mentioned a meeting with "Mr. Z".

Without evidence, Schiff automatically assumed that "Mr. Z" was President Zelensky of Ukraine. However, new documents are disputing that, and Schiff is about to have egg on his face.

Here's the scoop from Politico:

House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff appears to have mischaracterized a text message exchange between two players in the Ukraine saga, according to documents obtained by POLITICO — a possible error the GOP will likely criticize as another example of the Democrats’ rushed effort to impeach President Donald Trump.

The issue arose when Schiff (D-Calif.) sent a letter to House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.) last week summarizing a trove of evidence from Lev Parnas, an indicted former associate of Trump’s personal attorney Rudy Giuliani. In one section of the letter, Schiff claims that Parnas “continued to try to arrange a meeting with President Zelensky,” citing a specific text message exchange where Parnas tells Giuliani: “trying to get us mr Z.” The remainder of the exchange — which was attached to Schiff’s letter — was redacted.

But an unredacted version of the exchange shows that several days later, Parnas sent Giuliani a word document that appears to show notes from an interview with Mykola Zlochevsky, the founder of Burisma, followed by a text message to Giuliani that states: “mr Z answers my brother.” That suggests Parnas was referring to Zlochevsky not Zelensky.

This news has already been making the rounds on Twitter, and President Trump himself JUST tweeted about it:

A tweet from President Trump was something like Big story folks, I hope f**e news covers it.

Lt. Rob Polans ret.

Exactly! It was 3 shoes last night, this may be 4

BREAKING: New Documents Prove Adam Schiff Mischaracterized Key Piece Of Evidence
190.9K Views Share
Clayton Keirns
Follow Clayton Keirns
Posted January 22, 2020 in Politics

The liberal news media leaped for joy last week when they believed they had the "smoking gun" evidence against Donald Trump - a note from Rudy Giuliani that mentioned a meeting with "Mr. Z".

Without evidence, Schiff automatically assumed that "Mr. Z" was President Zelensky of Ukraine. However, new documents are disputing that, and Schiff is about to have egg on his face.

Here's the scoop from Politico:

House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff appears to have mischaracterized a text message exchange between two players in the Ukraine saga, according to documents obtained by POLITICO — a possible error the GOP will likely criticize as another example of the Democrats’ rushed effort to impeach President Donald Trump.

The issue arose when Schiff (D-Calif.) sent a letter to House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.) last week summarizing a trove of evidence from Lev Parnas, an indicted former associate of Trump’s personal attorney Rudy Giuliani. In one section of the letter, Schiff claims that Parnas “continued to try to arrange a meeting with President Zelensky,” citing a specific text message exchange where Parnas tells Giuliani: “trying to get us mr Z.” The remainder of the exchange — which was attached to Schiff’s letter — was redacted.

But an unredacted version of the exchange shows that several days later, Parnas sent Giuliani a word document that appears to show notes from an interview with Mykola Zlochevsky, the founder of Burisma, followed by a text message to Giuliani that states: “mr Z answers my brother.” That suggests Parnas was referring to Zlochevsky not Zelensky.

This news has already been making the rounds on Twitter, and President Trump himself JUST tweeted about it:

A tweet from President Trump was something like Big story folks, I hope f**e news covers it.

Lt. Rob Polans ret.

He isn't hiding, it's more a why get in the mud with the other pigs?

Lt. Rob Polans ret.

"What does it possibly matter now?" There is no justification for B******i. They had to k**l Amb. Stevens and that was the easiest way. The cia still found the missiles, the morons left the serial numbers on.

Lt. Rob Polans ret.

Did you see it? 1. Abuse of power-not an impeachable offense. 2. Obstruction of Congress-I never saw any proof. If they can use that every president after Trump will be impeached.

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

That is exactly right. Impeachment will become a political tool of the House Majority should an opposing president get elected and in most mid-term e******ns after a new president is elected, the House goes to the opposition party. Heck, we are essentially there at that place already!

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

Now, to claim executive privilege is obstruction. Holder was an example. Obama was doing the same thing but much more often during his "scandal-less" administration.

Radiance3

===============
The purpose is for Schitt and Nadler lie and lie to destroy the president's reputation, so people will not v**e for him on the 2020 e******n.

This is a campaign propaganda by Schitt and Nadler, trashing president Trump in order to sway e*****rates against him in 2020.

I think McConnell is not effective leader for the GOP Senate.I don't like him.

tbutkovich

Senate Minority Leader Schmuck Schumer is getting his A$$ kicked big time!