One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
What happened to the Republicans
Page <<first <prev 5 of 5
Jan 24, 2020 09:32:16   #
straightUp Loc: California
 
Weewillynobeerspilly wrote:
Damn StraightUp!!!........you have been busy on the forum as of late.

Everything ok man?


Yeah... I'm currently between projects, so I have a little more free time but somehow my "honey do" list got a lot bigger. LOL

Reply
Jan 24, 2020 10:27:19   #
jimpack123 Loc: wisconsin
 
straightUp wrote:
Well, they certainly turned it into a Dog and Pony show. As far as I am concerned, Trump isn't even the main issue here - it's Congress that's effectively being tested. The evidence against Trump is so overwhelming it's not even a debate anymore so the focus is shifting to the senators themselves.

Many of them are continuing to insist there is no proof of wrongdoing but their ONLY argument is... "because I say so". It's what you call flat-out denial, which is why they don't want to argue or debate the evidence.

In fairness to true conservatives (as opposed to the rabid right) it seems there ARE Republicans in Congress with an interest in doing what's right but they are being heavily warned not to v**e against Trump. Word got out from the Trump entourage that if senators “v**e against the president,” their “head will be on a pike.”

So the question is... will Congress fail to rein in a corrupt president and what kind of precedent will that create for us in the future?

I think conservatives need to seriously think about this because demographic trends indicate the liberals will continue to have a natural edge on democracy for years to come and a precedent that says it's OK for a ruling party to keep a president in office by dismissing all the evidence against him could well bite them in the ass if when that president and ruling party turns out to be Democrat.

If there is one thing the Right needs as they slip into minority status it's a reverence for the Constitution that protects people from abusive majorities.
Well, they certainly turned it into a Dog and Pony... (show quote)

Amen I do believe that at least 4GOP senators will v**e for witnesses anyone that is in up for ree******n will think long and hard about it

Reply
Jan 24, 2020 13:12:46   #
Weewillynobeerspilly Loc: North central Texas
 
straightUp wrote:
Yeah... I'm currently between projects, so I have a little more free time but somehow my "honey do" list got a lot bigger. LOL




I hear ya brother......honey do will always be there, so be safe in the knowledge of that. ....and it doubles in short order from my experience

Reply
 
 
Jan 24, 2020 14:45:34   #
straightUp Loc: California
 
CounterRevolutionary wrote:
This Senate hearing on President Trump's impeachment must, just like Nixon's, "Follow the Money."

Before I go down this rabbit hole, let me just point out that NO conspiracy or distraction can excuse the Senate's refusal to weigh the "evidence". It's very simple. The fact of the matter is, Senate Republicans are refusing to do their job. Even if the House were making all this stuff up... it is STILL the Constitutional duty for Senate to weigh the evidence. Even if Trump were saving the world from "bad people"... it is STILL the Constitutional duty for Senate to weigh the evidence. So if you're trying to excuse Senate Republicans for violating the Constitution, you're wasting your time.

That being said... let's see what you got.

CounterRevolutionary wrote:

Yesterday, January 22, 2020, we had a detailed account from the House Intelligence Committee of how President Donald Trump held up the delivery of monetary aid to the Ukraine to fight the dangerous Russian encroachment upon its borders in some f**e quid-pro-quo deal for dirt on Joe Biden.

Where would this military aid money appropriated by our Congress be deposited in the Ukraine?

It would be deposited into a highly contested crooked bank, the largest in the Ukrain, fully digitalized and automated, the Privatbank which was nationalized by former Ukrainian President Poroshenko because it was riddled with embezzlement of its cash moving from the Ukraine to Latvia to American banks
br Yesterday, January 22, 2020, we had a detailed... (show quote)

1. Your sarcastic "dangerous Russian encroachment upon its borders" is a poor description of the fact that Russia has actually invaded their country and taken control of significant parts of it including Crimea. The fact that you can present such details about Privatbank without even knowing that Russia has invaded tells me that you just found an article that you THINK provides an excuse for what Trump did.

2. It's not Trump's place to decide if they should get the funding. Congress approved the funding and Trump's job was to deliver it. If Trump had any issues with the corruption in the Ukraine, he should have made that case to Congress but he didn't.

3. After Trump's quid-pro-quo was leaked, he sent the money anyway. Which means your argument against sending money to corrupt Ukraine really isn't helping his case.

CounterRevolutionary wrote:

But, Privatbank has a tight connection to Barisma gas which is owned by another Russian Mafioso Mykola Zlochevsky. Just prior the win of the comedian Zelensky in the April 2019 Ukrainian e******n, President Poroshenko re-privatized Privatbank and gave it back to its Russian Mafia oligarch Kolomoisky's possession. Burisma gas company owner, Zlochevsky, (with the company's many subsidiaries merged with Privatbank), vanished and later popped up in Monaco opening a new energy company.

Yeah, so? The entire former Soviet Union is drowning in corruption, that includes both Russia and the Ukraine. We can talk about corruption in the former Soviet republics all day but in the end NONE of it matters to the impeachment case here in America. Bottom line... Trump tried to secretly bribe a foreign president for personal gain and that's a violation of our constitution and the fact that you are trying to make excuses for that violation is an acknowledgment that he is guilty (with an explanation) so again, you're not helping him.

CounterRevolutionary wrote:

The European Union now wants to circumvent President Trump's sanctions against Iranian oil purchases and is cooking up a loophole through Burisma to Iran, the world's biggest sponsor of terrorism.

That's an obvious sign that the U.S. under Trump is losing control of the situation. The EU is just getting tired of Trump's i***t games. They may come back to the fold when we get a decent president again but the world may never regain the confidence it once had in American long-term commitment. Trump is losing everywhere actually, North Korea made a joke out of him, even Iraq is demanding that we leave now since Trump pulled that bonehead move on Soleimani who was an invited guest in their country.

BTW, I know it's important for your BS rhetoric to keep referring to Iran as a the world's biggest sponsor of terrorism but statistically speaking, the world's biggest sponsor of terrorism is the United States of America.

CounterRevolutionary wrote:

By the way, H****r B***n as well as Devon Asher of Sec. State John Kerry's former p**********l campaign,, and Bill Clinton's 1999 CIA Counter terrorist chief, Joseph Cofer Black, all sat on Burisma's board of executives under the direction of Zlochevsky. Look this up on Wikipedia and scroll down to "Management":

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burisma_Holdings

So? Are American private citizens not allowed to sit on boards of foreign companies?

CounterRevolutionary wrote:

So, what is going on between Burisma and Privatbank of the Ukraine while the new President Zelensky is saddled with cleaning up this den of thieves?:

https://pjmedia.com/trending/did-biden-save-this-ukraine-firm-responsible-for-1-8b-in-missing-aid-his-son-is-on-the-board/
PJ Media: News and Politics
Did Biden Save This Ukraine Firm Responsible for $1.8B in Missing Aid? His Son is on the Board...
By Tyler O'Neil March 21, 2018
… Two major figures in this corruption feature prominently in Biden's Ukraine investment.

"Zlochevsky founded Burisma in Cyprus in 2006. He served as natural resources minister under Yanukovych, and gave himself the licenses to develop the country's abundant gas fields. He also had a flare for lavishness, running a super-exclusive fashion boutique named after himself.
br So, what is going on between Burisma and Priva... (show quote)

LOL - "a flare for lavishness" and "running a super-exclusive fashion boutique named after himself" Gee, who does THAT sound like? LOL

CounterRevolutionary wrote:

"Burisma's major subsidiaries ended up sharing the same business ad-dress as the natural gas firm controlled by Ukrainian oligarch Ihor Kolomoisky. He controlled the country's largest financial institution, ProvatBank, through which the Ukrainian military and government workers got paid. He also owned media companies and airlines. In violation of Ukraine law, he maintained Ukrainian, Israeli, and Cypr**t passports."

Is this where Congress and the IMF intend to deposit military aid packages to the Ukraine?

Wouldn't it be best for President Trump to wait for the newly elected President Zelensky to set up his new cabinet and justice department to clean up the Privatbank of the Ukraine before the United States deposits any financial aid money into the hands of the Russian mafia, Kolomoisky and Zlochevsky? How much of this money will end up purchasing Iranian oil for the European Union?

PJ Media continues:
"Kolomoisky gained a reputation for violence and brutality, along with lawlessness. Rival oligarchs have sued him for alleged involvement in "murders and beheadings" related to a business deal. He also allegedly used "hired rowdies armed with baseball bats, iron bars, gas and rubber bullet pistols and chainsaws" to take over a steel plant in 2006. He built his multibillion-dollar empire by "raiding" other companies, forcing them to merge with his own using brute force.

"For these and other reasons, the U.S. government placed Kolomoisky on its visa ban list, pro-hibiting him from entering the country legally. In 2015, however, after H****r B***n and Devon Archer had joined Burisma's board, Kolomoisky was given admittance back into the U.S.

"Archer and the younger Biden brought other benefits to Burisma, however. Archer represented the company at the Louisiana Gulf Coast Oil Exposition in 2015. Biden addressed the Energy Security for the Future conference in Monaco. The vice president's son brought much-needed legitimacy to the shoddy gas company.

"Less than a month after Archer joined Burisma's board, the company hired another Kerry lackey, David Leiter, as a lobbyist in Washington, D.C. He successfully lobbied for more aid to the country.

"Both Biden and Kerry championed $1.8 billion in taxpayer-backed loans to be given to Ukraine courtesy of the IMF. That money would go directly through Kolomoisky's PrivatBank, and then it would disappear.

According to the Ukrainian anticorruption watchdog Nashi Groshi, 'This t***saction of $1.8 bil-lion ... with the help of f**e contracts was simply an asset siphoning operation.'"
End of article.

Joseph Cofer Black of Burisma, and Blake Darche (founder of CrowdStrike where Hillary Clinton's DNC computer was inspected for "Russian hacking"), both men from the CIA, stationed in the Ukraine, makes this whole f**e impeachment affair stink to high heaven. Bells and whistles should be going off. Shut down the CIA!

Our good President Trump is trying to protect us from subsidizing the Russian Mafia and Iranian terrorists, and the Democrats are having a purple snit, insisting our financial aid to the Ukraine get into the most corrupt bank on the planet before Zelensky can clean up the mess.

[b[Follow the money, guys![/b]
br "Burisma's major subsidiaries ended up sh... (show quote)


Again, it's not Trump's place to overrule Congress. The IMF and the World Bank have rules about what a country can do with the money they get. If we don't have the confidence in those rules, then our elected legislators should not have approved the aid. If Trump had information about the corruption in the Ukraine that would be cause for concern, he should have addressed Congress about it. But he didn't. Chances are he DID know about all this, or certainly, Pompeo should have... It's not like everything you just described happened inside a week. So, why didn't Trump follow normal protocol and express his concern to Congress?

I'm betting it's because if Congress decided NOT to appropriate the funds, Trump would not have had that same leverage to bribe Zelensky with.

Anyway - thank you for giving me so much ammunition. I really enjoy shooting holes in your lame-ass excuses with your own bullets.

Reply
Jan 24, 2020 14:46:46   #
straightUp Loc: California
 
Weewillynobeerspilly wrote:
I hear ya brother......honey do will always be there, so be safe in the knowledge of that. ....and it doubles in short order from my experience

Yeah, I'm experiencing that now...

Reply
Jan 24, 2020 16:07:45   #
CounterRevolutionary
 
straightUp wrote:
Again, it's not Trump's place to overrule Congress. The IMF and the World Bank have rules about what a country can do with the money they get. If we don't have the confidence in those rules, then our elected legislators should not have approved the aid. If Trump had information about the corruption in the Ukraine that would be cause for concern, he should have addressed Congress about it. But he didn't. Chances are he DID know about all this, or certainly, Pompeo should have... It's not like everything you just described happened inside a week. So, why didn't Trump follow normal protocol and express his concern to Congress?

I'm betting it's because if Congress decided NOT to appropriate the funds, Trump would not have had that same leverage to bribe Zelensky with.

Anyway - thank you for giving me so much ammunition. I really enjoy shooting holes in your lame-ass excuses with your own bullets.
Again, it's not Trump's place to overrule Congress... (show quote)


Straigntup, you are highly confused about the separation of powers in our Constitution designed by our founding Fathers. The Executive Branch sets foreign policy, not Congress, who can only appropriate money for the President's foreign policy.

Now, let's talk about Putin seizing the Crimea. Why did he do it? (my answer does not mean I support Putin's foreign policy). When the Soviet Union broke up and the Iron Curtain countries were freed, including the Ukraine, One third of Russia's military-industrial complex went with it. The collapse of c*******m in Russia made the American Democrat Party and European Union cling to the next c*******t dictatorship China and its proxy, Iran, to promote the New World Order. Iran is oil, and the socialist EU would rather support c*******t Iran than the capitalists in Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, United Emirates, or even Iraq who have much more oil to sell.

Below is an old 2014 article from the Washington Times regarding the Ukraine's military aid shipments to Red China. Keep in mind, that China's biggest oil supplier is Iran and Trump has placed an international trade embargo on its phony fundamentalist centralized planning dictatorship of mullahs of which Barisma and the EU wants to do business with big-time. This is destabilizing peace in the Middle East and Russia and Latin America.

This is a very lengthy article from the Washington Times, and I certainly cannot copy it all, but I suggest you pull it up and read the entire text to get better educated on how Trump's economic warfare operates; better this than a full scale invasion of troops into Iran:

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/mar/13/inside-china-why-putins-intervention-in-ukraine-is/
"Inside China: Why Putin’s intervention in Ukraine is bad news for China
The Washington Times ... By Miles Yu - - Thursday, March 13, 2014 ...
The vessel is the world's largest hovercraft, and is essential for amphibious assault landings along beaches and coastlines. ... In a deal with Ukraine, China obtained its navy's largest ocean-going ship ...

"On March 1, two tugboats hurriedly towed a nearly completed behemoth out of Ukraine’s Feodosiya shipyard on the Crimean Peninsula. It was loaded quickly onto a huge cargo ship that set sail to China....

"Ukraine is ranked as the world’s sixth-largest arms exporter. The former Soviet republic inherited a substantial portion of Moscow’s weapons expertise and military industry: About 30 percent of all Soviet defense industries are located inside Ukraine.

"The Ukrainian PA Yuzhmash weapons plant alone produced two-thirds of the Soviet Union’s surface-to-air missiles, nearly half of all Soviet ballistic missiles, and almost all of the Soviets’ space launch vehicles. Three of the Soviet Union’s six surface warship shipyards were located in Ukraine and made all classes of vessels from frigates and destroyers to nuclear-powered cruisers and aircraft carriers.
After Ukraine gained independence in 1991, many of the Soviet-era military design and manufacturing capabilities remained in Ukraine, creating a dilemma for Kiev: Its big-ticket weapons systems, defense technologies, military production capabilities and weapons experts left over from the Soviet era far exceeded the needs of independent Ukraine’s defenses.

"As a result, over the past two decades, Ukraine has binged on arms sales, exporting advanced Soviet weapons surpluses. And Kiev’s biggest customer has been China, under an international arms embargo since 1989 following the People’s Liberation Army’s slaughter of pro-democracy protesters in Tiananmen Square.

"Over the past two decades, Ukraine has been instrumental in helping the Chinese navy become a blue-water force with global reach. The crown jewel of China’s nationalism is the Kuznetsov-class aircraft carrier Liaoning. The half-finished Soviet vessel, then-known as the Varyag, was purchased for $20 million by the Chinese military from the Ukrainian government in 1998...."

Straigntup, you need to also understand that Iran's terrorist network, not only sends Spanish speaking trained Hezbollah and HAMAS agents to Latin America to partner with Venezuelan and Columbian c*******t - f*****t FARC drug cartels, and Mexican gangs crossing our southern border, but Iran also subsidizes the c*******t terrorists Chechen rebels inside Russia to destroy this fledgling Russian Federation democracy. Recall that Putin also invaded Iran to impede Iran's terrorist aggressions against Russia.

It is former President Obama's foreign policy of ending sanctions on Iran and entering in this disastrous nuclear deal, subsidizing Iran's international terrorism, while bailing out the European Union, Iran's biggest trading partner, that represents a world international security threat.

Even the AFL-CIO Trumpkin backs President Trump's economic warfare against China and Iran. See this labor union's support in the video "Death By China".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mMlmjXtnIXI
Death By China: How America Lost Its Manufacturing Base (Official Version)

Reply
Jan 24, 2020 16:38:13   #
CounterRevolutionary
 
EconomistDon wrote:
Thank you CounterRev. I can imagine Airplane and the rest of the lefty loonies with their fingers in their ears, going "LaLaLaLa" to avoid your post. If witnesses are called in the Senate, this information must come out. Trump was holding the funds for very good reason, and said that already. Trump explained that Zelensky was new to the scene in the Ukraine, and Trump needed to determine who he could trust before releasing the funds. But the real reasons for withholding the funds do not support the Democrat hatred that is driving this impeachment. So they will go on with "LaLaLaLa" and spouting their hatred.

BTW, the GAO reported that Obama withheld funds to other countries something like 19 times. No big deal. And Obama gave very little to the Ukraine because he was afraid of upsetting Putin.
Thank you CounterRev. I can imagine Airplane and ... (show quote)


Don, you write that "BTW, the GAO reported that Obama withheld funds to other countries something like 19 times. No big deal. And Obama gave very little to the Ukraine because he was afraid of upsetting Putin.[/quote]

I'm not sure Obama was afraid of Putin, but certainly disliked him, since Obama supported Iran through subsidizing the European Union, Iran's biggest trading partner, which was subsidizing the Chechen Rebels to destroy the Russian Federation. Obama also engaged in economic warfare against Russia by financing the Ukrainian civil war, sending our CIA, Biden, Kerry. George Soros, partnered with Russian c*******t Mafia Mikhail Khodorkovsky, (YUKOS Oli oligarch) with the neo-N**i Sefano Bandera gang to take over the media and arm the rebels. 400 Ukrainians were buried alive in this r*******n, just to oust Yukanovich and install president Poroshenko, who joined the socialist European Union of which our Federal Reserve Bank bailed out to the tune of $16 TRILLION dollars printed out of this air after the international housing market collapsed.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CkoOGQnj_aE
Ukraine on Fire The Real Story Full Documentary by Oliver Stone Original English version

Reply
Page <<first <prev 5 of 5
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.