Isn't this the nature of politics?? (Page 2): Glad for you all ! I wish we could get rid of all the Democrats and RINO Republicans here in Illinory then and only then we'd have a great...

4430 Loc: Little Egypt ** Southern Illinory

CarryOn wrote:

Same here in MO with that hag mccask**l ... so happy she got booted out by Josh Hawley ..... she refused to make any kind of commitment, and every response on every controversial issue was that she was "still gathering information" ... no kidding .. same phrase over and over .... right up to the time of the v**e and then she would most often v**e with her party and not with the people of MO. So she is gone, gone, gone ....

Glad for you all !

I wish we could get rid of all the Democrats and RINO Republicans here in Illinory then and only then we'd have a great chance of MIGA = Making Illinory Great Again

Peewee Loc: San Antonio, TX

Carol Kelly wrote:

This is exactly what’s been bothering me. How many Romneys will v**e against our Working President. I’m hopeful that enough Democrats will see the error of the direction their party has taken to override the RINOS in the Senate. Harry Reid is a Mormon, Romney is a Mormon. Makes one wonder!

Don't forget Mike Lee saying the intel briefing was the worst ever while others said it was outstanding. They lie in wait until activated by their handlers. The only word that fits is a t*****r.

CarryOn

Peewee wrote:

Don't forget Mike Lee saying the intel briefing was the worst ever while others said it was outstanding. They lie in wait until activated by their handlers. The only word that fits is a t*****r.

Yes .. he showed his true colors too ... right alongside mitt ...

4430 Loc: Little Egypt ** Southern Illinory

CarryOn wrote:

Yes .. he showed his true colors too ... right alongside mitt ...

Mike Lee really surprised me !

lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas

nwtk2007 wrote:

It seems that republicans like Flake find it unfai... (show quote)

So, that means the majority of Americans for whom trump was NOT their choice for President, are just SOL?

Here's the problem;

Trump is President for 66,000,000 Americans out of 320,000,000..............leaving 240,000,000 with NO President.

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

lpnmajor wrote:

So, that means the majority of Americans for whom trump was NOT their choice for President, are just SOL?

Here's the problem;

Trump is President for 66,000,000 Americans out of 320,000,000..............leaving 240,000,000 with NO President.

He won so, yep. Don't like it, change the law!

CarryOn

4430 wrote:

Mike Lee really surprised me !

Me, too, 4430 ... But I suppose at this point we should not be surprised when any politician shows his/her true colors ... it's the nature of the beast ....

Peewee Loc: San Antonio, TX

lpnmajor wrote:

So, that means the majority of Americans for whom trump was NOT their choice for President, are just SOL?

Here's the problem;

Trump is President for 66,000,000 Americans out of 320,000,000..............leaving 240,000,000 with NO President.

Wrong, you didn't v**e so you lost. We would have won by a larger margin but also didn't v**e and the margin of victory was smaller. The winner is the president of all, whether you or we v**ed or not. That's the way it has always been. We gritted through Obama, you need to grit through Trump. But you would rather pout and disrupt and start a civil war. Gee, more death and destruction, figures. Bernie bros are already wanting to k**l, burn, and destroy.

maximus Loc: Chattanooga, Tennessee

lpnmajor wrote:

So, that means the majority of Americans for whom trump was NOT their choice for President, are just SOL?

Here's the problem;

Trump is President for 66,000,000 Americans out of 320,000,000..............leaving 240,000,000 with NO President.

Since when did a sitting president duly elected become president only for those that v**ed for him. Those who have no president are without by choice, nothing more. Out of that 320 million, only about 130 million v**ed. Why do you have to post something that's not true to bolster your views?
You know we used to call a person that bawled and pouted and threw things and cursed others because they didn't get their way a spoiled brat, but now we just call them democrats.

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

maximus wrote:

Since when did a sitting president duly elected become president only for those that v**ed for him. Those who have no president are without by choice, nothing more. Out of that 320 million, only about 130 million v**ed. Why do you have to post something that's not true to bolster your views?
You know we used to call a person that bawled and pouted and threw things and cursed others because they didn't get their way a spoiled brat, but now we just call them democrats.

debeda

nwtk2007 wrote:

It seems that republicans like Flake find it unfai... (show quote)

YES

debeda

CarryOn wrote:

You are absolutely right! br br I'm just glad h... (show quote)

Right ON

Hug

CarryOn wrote:

Same here in MO with that hag mccask**l ... so happy she got booted out by Josh Hawley ..... she refused to make any kind of commitment, and every response on every controversial issue was that she was "still gathering information" ... no kidding .. same phrase over and over .... right up to the time of the v**e and then she would most often v**e with her party and not with the people of MO. So she is gone, gone, gone ....

Couldn't get rid of her fast enough. Now we need to replace Roy Blunt. With Blunt it has always been about the money. Blunt works for the Establishment, nor for the people.

CarryOn

Hug wrote:

Couldn't get rid of her fast enough. Now we need to replace Roy Blunt. With Blunt it has always been about the money. Blunt works for the Establishment, nor for the people.

Agree with you on that one, Hug. I, too, think Blunt is definitely Establishment and in it for the money .. and power. From what I hear, he is one of the top fundraisers and that is why he has so much power to begin with.

Fortunately, he has stood by President Trump (at least publicly) on most things ... so far. Given the mood here .. at least in the people I see around me .. he'd better hang in there with Trump, too, or he will see himself run out of office just like the hag. I know I've called his office more than once just to add my .02 to what we expect of him ... and I always make sure to point out that I am one of those "college-educated suburban housewives" that the dems seem to think they have a chance to turn against Trump .. not happening.

Are you also from the Show Me State?

Hug

CarryOn wrote:

Agree with you on that one, Hug. I, too, think Bl... (show quote)

Yes, I knew Blunt when he was Missouri Secretary of State. I liked him then. Blunt inherited Hancoks seat in the house. Blunt went for the money as soon as he got to Washington. Was mixed up in a scandal early on. Publically supports President Trump, but will cut President Trumps throat if given the chance.