woodguru

They announced they are opening an investigation into why Yovanovitch was fired... and that my friends is an investigation that incorporates the whole ball of sticky Parnas wax. It by the way is an investigation that attorney general Barr and the DOJ should have taken up over a year ago...oh wait, Barr is part of the criminal conspiracy on multiple levels.

Barr needs to retain a criminal defense attorney, and not on the tax payer's dime either, a personal attorney paid for by himself. He has brought actions against members of his own organization and if ever there was Karma this is it.

So what do you think, should a president under this degree of personal involvement in a criminal conspiracy on multiple levels be able to invoke executive privilege let alone pardon anyone involved?

bggamers Loc: georgia

Barr cant investigate another countries issues

Radiance3

=============
This is what happened after the long waiting of the Articles to be submitted at the Senate Office. Pelosi/Schitt gathered more h**x to present. McConnell must dismiss the Articles, and allow them to file another impeachment inquiry based on added h**x they found.

woodguru

Barr was apparently involved in an effort to make the case go away against Dymetrio, one of the oligarchs involved in the Ukraine corruption who is wanted by the US. This is not the first instance Giuliani has been paid by foreign criminals to influence their cases, and Cohen was involved in the same thing. Barr has been sitting on cases that the DOJ should have been all over.

The issue I'm talking about is that the Ukraine has opened an investigation involving Yovanovitch being fired...

and the DOJ has the ability to investigate and prosecute everyone involved in the Ukraine scandal, it is exactly what the DOJ does.

https://www.alternet.org/2020/01/trump-buried-in-mockery-as-ukraine-announces-an-investigation-into-his-associates-art-of-the-deal-baby/?utm_source=&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=3503

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

This is good. She was denying visa's to people from Ukraine wanting to go meet with US gov officials regarding the Bidens and Burisma. We now know who those individuals are. This should prove interesting.

woodguru

If it's a h**x that would be super easy to prove, where is the DOJ in this, it is their responsibility to investigate possible criminal activity...oh wait, Barr is part of the coverup.

Seth

LOL! Whenever anyone on the right side of the aisle refuses to be railroaded on the basis of slanderous lies, your ilk yells that it's a "cover-up!"

Fig A, your ilk: -- "It's a cover-up!"

Meanwhile, the Obama Administration, which was the longest running soup-to-nuts cover-up in the history of the universe, was, by your ilk's lights, "wholesome" in every way.

Figure B, your ilk: 🙈 -- "Nothing to see here."

Radiance3

===============
History has proven that DOJ Barr has the best integrity on his track records.
He is under the president's jurisdiction, while complying with all policies protocols available on his official disposal. He reports to the president.

It was Loretta Lynch who violated her rule as DOJ by allowing Comey to decide the exoneration of Hillary. Comey has no authority to exonerate but investigate while Loretta renders the decision . Loretta allowed Comey and told him just call the Hillary case a matter. Out of 15 violations of federal laws, she advised Comey to call it a matter. July 2016.

Radiance3

================
Forget it Guru. The president has the liberty to dismiss all prior employees and to hire his own under his administration.

Whether the person did a good or poor job, I will fire all prior appointees and hire my own. I choose what I want, who I could trust, to carry the responsibilities assigned to them in good faith . This is a p**********l executive power, no one must interfere.

Obama did that no one complained. Like president Bush to. Why question president Trump? Are you guys so greedy of power wanting to take over the president's?

Radiance3

=============
The Articles of Impeachment was a h**x. I've explained this over and over to these dumb bells.

The impeachment proceedings were under the House jurisdiction. They did the inquiry at a secret basement with locked door, then Schitt and Pelosi, did the deliberation, depriving the presence of the GOP Intelligence officers. Then they made up the h**x issues.

DOJ Barr must not be part of this.That is under the House of Congress who does the proceedings.

The Articles of Impeachment was a h**x and unconstitutional.That will be proven at the Senate trial. Don't be so dumb. I am tired of you.

Seth

Mr. Wood can't help himself -- he's so caught up in the Democrat party line that facts, reality, logic and t***h in general don't even register in his thought process.

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

Media Bias/Fact Check

AlterNet is a liberal activist news service and is a project of the non-profit Independent Media Institute that Launched in 1998. According to their about page “AlterNet has developed a unique model of journalism to confront the failures of corporate media, as well as the vitriol and disinformation of right wing media, especially “h**e talk” media.” The current editor is Roxanne Cooper.

In 2018, AlterNet was bought by the owners of the left leaning Raw Story under the newly created company AlterNet Media. According John Byrne, who is one of the owners of Raw Story, “AlterNet will continue to carry content from the Independent Media Institute, its prior owner.” According to Fairness.com the “Independent Media Institute has served the public through the creation and distribution of content about political and social issues.”

Funded by / Ownership

AlterNet is owned by the owners of Raw Story under the name AlterNet Media. The website is funded through online advertising.

Analysis / Bias

In review, AlterNet publishes news with a far left bias through story se******n and the use of emotionally loaded words such as these: Trump goes off in an all-caps New Year’s Eve Twitter meltdown: ‘MEXICO IS PAYING FOR THE WALL’ and The F Word: The Craven Right Wing Is Now Smearing Teenage School Shooting Survivors. The website also features a separate news category that focuses on negative reports about Donald Trump. When it comes to sourcing, AlterNet typically uses known mainstream sources such as the New York Daily News and NBC News.

AlterNet also frequently delves into p***********e with the promotion of anti-GMO propaganda, which is not consistent with the consensus of science. AlterNet has conistently reported on the connection between cell phones and cancer, which is misleading as there is not a scientific consensus on whether radiation for cell phones causes cancer or not.

In general, AlterNet consistently publishes pro-Left news stories and those that denigrate the right.

A factual search reveals that AlterNet has a Mixed claim via Snopes and false claim from Check Your Fact.

Overall, we rate AlterNet far Left Biased based on story se******n and wording that always favors the left. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to a few failed fact checks as well as the promotion of p***********e.

Tug484

Parnes doesn't look credible and people in the Ukraine are saying he's lying because they never talked to him.

Seth

He's followed around by a long trail of fraud and unpaid debts, reporters who have used him as a source say the Dems will get burned if they put any stock in him and face it: like the treacherous Cohen, the mutt's willing to tell the feds wh**ever they want to hear if it will help reduce his eventual sentence.

When they snatched him and his partner up at Dulles, they were fleeing subpoenas with one way tickets for the tall timber.

The Democrats' usual star witness, one of honesty, credibility and ethics...

NOT!!!

Tug484

That sure hits the nail on the head.