Bring common sense to the table, we all know what makes sense and what doesn't...
The defense that Parnas is a liar isn't going to hold up here for several reasons that make sense against arguments that will not hold up, think here people, this is a Darwin moment...
...the first defense we will hear is that Parnas is a liar, so...everyone involved is lying and is a liar, we know this, it's not f**e news
...the number off things Parnas is saying are so numerous and detailed it is virtually impossible to spin lies this convoluted
...stories of this nature come with pure corroboration, there are substantial other references with documents and other proof that the claims fit with other sources, fabrications get spotted because the facts don't match
...denials by the parties with criminal exposure are the least credible thing in the picture, of course the person looking at criminal charges is going to lie, it's what they do, they have to lie rather than face charges
...the person coming clean who is also involved especially when facing charges has every reason to be as t***hful as possible, yes they may be a liar because it's what they do, but that point of coming clean is where they will be at their most reliably t***hful. Saying they are lying as a defense is denial
...and the ultimate in common sense, does what we are looking at fit a pattern, does the person have a history of such behavior, or does this person have such an impeccable history that such behavior simply doesn't fit. We know, everyone knows including supporters that this president doesn't necessarily follow the rules, heck it's what his people like about him. That established it is no stretch to accept that he was withholding both aid and support, perhaps you don't care or see anything wrong with that. Okay fine, but were laws broken, were things done in a way that simply are not acceptable conduct from the president. Is it okay for him to make a policy pressuring a country that has nothing to do with foreign policy or the best interests of our country? It is not, not by this president or any other...
...and before going into whataboutism, there has never been any president who has ever come even close to this so don't go there, it is utterly ridiculous.
woodguru wrote:
Bring common sense to the table, we all know what makes sense and what doesn't...
The defense that Parnas is a liar isn't going to hold up here for several reasons that make sense against arguments that will not hold up, think here people, this is a Darwin moment...
...the first defense we will hear is that Parnas is a liar, so...everyone involved is lying and is a liar, we know this, it's not f**e news
...the number off things Parnas is saying are so numerous and detailed it is virtually impossible to spin lies this convoluted
...stories of this nature come with pure corroboration, there are substantial other references with documents and other proof that the claims fit with other sources, fabrications get spotted because the facts don't match
...denials by the parties with criminal exposure are the least credible thing in the picture, of course the person looking at criminal charges is going to lie, it's what they do, they have to lie rather than face charges
...the person coming clean who is also involved especially when facing charges has every reason to be as t***hful as possible, yes they may be a liar because it's what they do, but that point of coming clean is where they will be at their most reliably t***hful. Saying they are lying as a defense is denial
...and the ultimate in common sense, does what we are looking at fit a pattern, does the person have a history of such behavior, or does this person have such an impeccable history that such behavior simply doesn't fit. We know, everyone knows including supporters that this president doesn't necessarily follow the rules, heck it's what his people like about him. That established it is no stretch to accept that he was withholding both aid and support, perhaps you don't care or see anything wrong with that. Okay fine, but were laws broken, were things done in a way that simply are not acceptable conduct from the president. Is it okay for him to make a policy pressuring a country that has nothing to do with foreign policy or the best interests of our country? It is not, not by this president or any other...
...and before going into whataboutism, there has never been any president who has ever come even close to this so don't go there, it is utterly ridiculous.
Bring common sense to the table, we all know what ... (
show quote)
I wonder what schitt or nadler offered him
woodguru wrote:
Bring common sense to the table, we all know what makes sense and what doesn't...
The defense that Parnas is a liar isn't going to hold up here for several reasons that make sense against arguments that will not hold up, think here people, this is a Darwin moment...
...the first defense we will hear is that Parnas is a liar, so...everyone involved is lying and is a liar, we know this, it's not f**e news
...the number off things Parnas is saying are so numerous and detailed it is virtually impossible to spin lies this convoluted
...stories of this nature come with pure corroboration, there are substantial other references with documents and other proof that the claims fit with other sources, fabrications get spotted because the facts don't match
...denials by the parties with criminal exposure are the least credible thing in the picture, of course the person looking at criminal charges is going to lie, it's what they do, they have to lie rather than face charges
...the person coming clean who is also involved especially when facing charges has every reason to be as t***hful as possible, yes they may be a liar because it's what they do, but that point of coming clean is where they will be at their most reliably t***hful. Saying they are lying as a defense is denial
...and the ultimate in common sense, does what we are looking at fit a pattern, does the person have a history of such behavior, or does this person have such an impeccable history that such behavior simply doesn't fit. We know, everyone knows including supporters that this president doesn't necessarily follow the rules, heck it's what his people like about him. That established it is no stretch to accept that he was withholding both aid and support, perhaps you don't care or see anything wrong with that. Okay fine, but were laws broken, were things done in a way that simply are not acceptable conduct from the president. Is it okay for him to make a policy pressuring a country that has nothing to do with foreign policy or the best interests of our country? It is not, not by this president or any other...
...and before going into whataboutism, there has never been any president who has ever come even close to this so don't go there, it is utterly ridiculous.
Bring common sense to the table, we all know what ... (
show quote)
You accept liars as long as they say what you want to hear. You are such a phony.
woodguru wrote:
Bring common sense to the table, we all know what makes sense and what doesn't...
The defense that Parnas is a liar isn't going to hold up here for several reasons that make sense against arguments that will not hold up, think here people, this is a Darwin moment...
...the first defense we will hear is that Parnas is a liar, so...everyone involved is lying and is a liar, we know this, it's not f**e news
...the number off things Parnas is saying are so numerous and detailed it is virtually impossible to spin lies this convoluted
...stories of this nature come with pure corroboration, there are substantial other references with documents and other proof that the claims fit with other sources, fabrications get spotted because the facts don't match
...denials by the parties with criminal exposure are the least credible thing in the picture, of course the person looking at criminal charges is going to lie, it's what they do, they have to lie rather than face charges
...the person coming clean who is also involved especially when facing charges has every reason to be as t***hful as possible, yes they may be a liar because it's what they do, but that point of coming clean is where they will be at their most reliably t***hful. Saying they are lying as a defense is denial
...and the ultimate in common sense, does what we are looking at fit a pattern, does the person have a history of such behavior, or does this person have such an impeccable history that such behavior simply doesn't fit. We know, everyone knows including supporters that this president doesn't necessarily follow the rules, heck it's what his people like about him. That established it is no stretch to accept that he was withholding both aid and support, perhaps you don't care or see anything wrong with that. Okay fine, but were laws broken, were things done in a way that simply are not acceptable conduct from the president. Is it okay for him to make a policy pressuring a country that has nothing to do with foreign policy or the best interests of our country? It is not, not by this president or any other...
...and before going into whataboutism, there has never been any president who has ever come even close to this so don't go there, it is utterly ridiculous.
Bring common sense to the table, we all know what ... (
show quote)
Lets see now, Parnas was "spying" on the US Ambassador to Ukraine; the person denying visa's to some from Ukraine wanting to bring information to the US gov regarding the Biden's. Hmm. We were also not allowed to fully question her inthe impeachment inquiry.
Well, now we can!!
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.