One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register ☰
Main
The War Pigs Are Finally Revealing Themselves - And This Is Just The Beginning...
Page <prev 2 of 2
Jan 14, 2020 14:06:28   #
Owl32 Loc: ARK
 
? if all these people have such entanglements in the NWO/CFR what are they doing in our Government and Congress? This whole business is Anti-American and contrary to our Constitution. They all need to go and 3/4 of them placed in a hole in the Ground.

Reply
Jan 14, 2020 14:43:58   #
Seth
 
Owl32 wrote:
most have been there long, TERM LIMITS, put on the B****t the People will v**e for it!


Most v**ers are unaware that these folks are affiliated with g*******t causes. A lot of those on Eagle's list are people one would hardly suspect of having ulterior motives to those of the founders.

While they're infinitely more subtle than the raging lefties that confront us every day, they pose just as great a danger to our sovereignty and our identity as a nation as the outspoken left.

George Dubya Bush, when he was POTUS, acting in concert with then Mexican President Vicente Fox and then Canadian P.M. Stephen Harper, put together the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America(SPP), a stealthy attempt at creating a North American Union exactly like the EU. The only people allowed to attend their summits were the American Foreign Relations Committee and the three countries' "captains of industry." Reporters weren't permitted to attend, and after conferences were flat out told that what was discussed was none of their business.

It took sharp patriotic congressmen like Tom Tancredo to throw a monkey wrench into the works, so the SPP never reached fruition.

*Tancredo was the primary candidate I supported for the 2008 e******ns, but as he was the Democrats' worst nightmare, the media pretended he didn't exist while they gave RINO McCain enough coverage to make him the nominee.


Reply
Jan 14, 2020 16:34:59   #
Lt. Rob Polans ret.
 
eagleye13 wrote:
Bring our troops home!

The War Pigs Are Finally Revealing Themselves - And This Is Just The Beginning...
https://www.zerohedge.com/users/tyler-durden


n 2016 during the e******n campaign of Donald Trump one of the primary factors of his popularity among conservatives was that he was one of the first candidates since Ron Paul to argue for bringing US troops home and ending American involvement in the various elitist fabricated wars in the Middle East. From Iraq, to Afghanistan, to Syria and Yemen and beyond, the Neo-Cons and Neo-Libs at the behest of their g*******t masters had been waging war oversees unabated for over 15 years. The time was ripe for a change and people felt certain that if Hillary Clinton entered the White House, another 4-8 years of war were guaranteed.

https://www.zerohedge.com/s3/files/inline-images/animal%20farm%20pig1.jpg?itok=-RuNkHSF

There was nothing to be gained from these wars. They were only d**gging the US down socially and economically, and even the idea of “getting the oil” had turned into a farce as the majority of Iraqi oil has been going to China, not the US. General estimates on the costs of the wars stand at $5 trillion US tax dollars and over 4500 American dead along with around 40,000 wounded. The only people that were benefiting from the situation were g*******ts and banking elites, who had been clamoring to destabilize the Middle East since the day they launched their “Project For A New American Century” (PNAC). Truly, all wars are banker wars.
The Obama Administration's attempts to lure Americans into supporting open war with the Assad regime in Syria had failed. Consistent attempts by George W. Bush and Obama to increase tensions with Iran had fizzled. Americans were showing signs of fatigue, FINALLY fed up with the lies being constructed to trick them into being complicit in the banker wars. Trump was a breath of fresh air...but of course, like all other puppets of the g*******ts, his promises were empty.

In my article 'Clinton vs. Trump And The Co-Option Of The Liberty Movement', published before the 2016 e******n, I warned that Trump's rhetoric might be a grand show, and that it could be scripted by the establishment to bring conservatives back into the Republican/Neo-Con fold. At the time, l*****t media outlet Bloomberg openly reveled in the idea that Trump might absorb and destroy the “Tea Party” and liberty movement and turn them into something far more manageable. The question was whether or not the liberty movement would buy into Trump completely, or remain skeptical.

Initially, I do not think the movement held onto its objectivity at all. Far too many people bought into Trump blindly and immediately based on misguided hopes and a desire to “win” against the l*****ts. The insane cultism of the political left didn't help matters much, either.

When Trump started saturating his cabinet with banking elites and g*******ts from the CFR the moment he entered office, I knew without any doubt that he was a fraud. Close associations with establishment swamp creatures was something he had consistently criticized Clinton and other politicians for during the campaign, but Trump was no better or different than Clinton; he was just an errand boy for the elites. The singular difference was that his rhetoric was designed to appeal directly to liberty minded conservatives.

This meant that it was only a matter of time before Trump broke most of his campaign promises, including his assertions that he would bring US troops home. Eventually, the mask had to come off if Trump was going to continue carrying out the agenda of his masters.

Today, the mask has indeed come off. For the past three years Trump has made announcements of an imminent pull back of troops in the Middle East, including the recent claim that troops would be leaving Syria. All of the announcements were followed by an INCREASE in US troop presence in the region. Consistent attempts have been made to foment renewed strife with Iran. The build-up to war has been obvious, but some people on the Trump train still didn't get it.

The most common argument I heard when pointing out all the inconsistencies in Trump's claims as well as his direct links to g*******ts was that “He hadn't started any wars, so how could he be a g*******t puppet...?” My response has always been “Give it a little time, and he will.”

One of my readers noted recently that “Trump Derangement Syndrome” (TDS) actually goes both ways. L*****ts double down on their hatred of Trump at every opportunity, but Trump cultists double down on their support for Trump regardless of how many promises he breaks. This has always been my biggest concern – That conservatives in the liberty movement would ultimately abandon their principles of limited government, the end to banking elites in the White House and ending illegal wars because they had invested themselves so completely in the Trump farce that they would be too embarrassed to admit they had been conned.

Another concern is that the liberty movement would be infected by an influx of people who are neo-conservative statists at their core. These people pretend to be liberty minded conservatives, but when the veil is lifted they show their true colors as the War Pigs they really are. A distinction has to be made between Bush era Neo-Con control freaks and constitutional conservatives; there are few if any similarities between the two groups, but the establishment hopes that the former will devour the latter.

I've noticed that the War Pigs are out in force this past week, beating their chests a calling for more blood. The US government has assassinated Iranian military commander Qasem Soleimani, retaliations against US targets have begun, and now the Iraqi government has demanded that US troops be removed from the region, to which Trump has said “no” and demanded payment instead. A new troop surge has been initiated and this WILL end in all out war. The tit-for-tat has just begun.

How do Trump cultists respond? “K**l those terrorists!”

Yes, many of the same people that applauded Trump's supposed opposition to the wars three years ago are now fanatically cheering for the beginning of perhaps the most destructive war of all. The rationalizations for this abound. Soleimani was planning attacks on US targets in Iraq, they say. And, this might be true, though no hard proof has yet been presented.

I'm reminded of the Bush era claims of Iraqi “Weapons of Mass Destruction”, the weapons that were never found and no proof was found that they ever existed. The only weapons Iraq had were the weapons the US sold to them decades ago. Any government can fabricate an excuse for assassination or war for public consumption; the Trump Administration is no different.

That said, I think the most important factor in this debate has fallen by the wayside. The bottom line is, US troops and US bases should NOT be in Iraq in the first place. Trump himself stated this time and time again. Even if Soleimani was behind the attacks and r**ts in Iraq, US assets cannot be attacked in the region if they are REMOVED from the region as Trump said he would do.

There is only one reason to keep US assets in Iraq, Afghanistan or Syria at this time, and that is to create ongoing tensions in the area which can be used by the establishment to trigger a new war, specifically with Iran.

The War Pigs always have reasons and rationales, though.

They say the Muslim world is a threat to our way of life, and I agree that their ideology is completely incompatible with Western values. That said, the solution is not sending young Americans to die overseas in wars based on lies. Again, these wars only benefit the bankers and g*******ts; they do not make us safer as a people. The only moral solution is to make sure the f*****t elements of Muslim extremism are not imported to our shores.

The War Pigs say that we deserve payment for our “services rendered” in the region before we leave, echoing the sentiments of Donald Trump. I ask, what services? Payment for what? The invasion the Iraqi's didn't want, based on fallacies that have been publicly exposed? The US bases that should not be there in the first place? The hundreds of thousands dead from a war that had no purpose except to deliberately destabilize the region?

We will never get “payment” from the Iraqis as compensation for these mad endeavors, and the War Pigs know this. They want war. They want it to go on forever. They want to attach their egos to the event. They want to claim glory for themselves vicariously when we win, and they want to claim victimhood for themselves vicariously when our soldiers or citizens get k**led. They are losers that can only be winners through the sacrifices of others.

The War Pigs defend the notion that the president should be allowed to make war unilaterally without support from congress. They say that this type of action is legal, and technically they are right. It is “legal” because the checks and balances of war were removed under the Bush and Obama Administrations. The passage of the AUMF (Authorization For Use Of Military Force) in 2001 gave the Executive Branch dictatorial powers to initiate war on a whim without oversight. Just because it is “legal” does not mean it is constitutional, or right.

In the end, the Trump bandwagon is meant to accomplish many things for the g*******ts; the main goal though is that it is designed to change liberty conservatives into rabid statists. It is designed to make anti-war pro-constitution activists into war mongers and supporters of big government, as long as it is big government under “our control”. But it's not under our control. Trump is NOT our guy. He is an agent of the establishment and always has been.

For now, the saber rattling is aggressive but the actions have been limited, but this will not be the case for long. Some may ask why the establishment has not simply launched all out war now? Why start out small? Firstly, they need conservatives psychologically invested in the idea. This may require a false f**g event or attack on American civilians. Secondly, they need to execute an extensive troop build-up, which could take a few months. Declarations of a "need for peace" are always used to stall for time while the elites position for war.

War with Iran is pointless, and frankly, unwinnable, and the elites know this. It's not just a war with Iran, it is a war with Iran, their allies, and every other nation that reacts negatively to our actions. And, these nations do not have to react militarily, they can react economically by dumping US treasuries and the dollar as world reserve.

The establishment wants the US embroiled in Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, etc. until we are so hollowed out from conflict that we collapse.

They also need a considerable distraction to hide their responsibility for the implosion of the Everything Bubble and the economic pain that will come with it. The end game for the establishment is for America to self destruct, so that it can be rebuilt into something unrecognizable and eternally monstrous. They want every vestige of our original principles to be erased, and to do that, they need us to be complicit in our own destruction.

They need us to participate. Don't participate, and refuse to support new banker wars. Don't be a War Pig.
Bring our troops home! br br The War Pigs Are Fin... (show quote)


I agree with bring the troops home and yes there has been a buildup of them lately. Something I disagree with. The mask is off? Yes, but not in the way that he says. The terrorist was k**led (how does he justify Trump is a g*******t next to that)? Now add to it what I've tried to tell you, no clue if you were listening. So, second in command of terror in the middle east, first in command of terror in the middle east for the deep state. And President Trump's a g*******t? Sorry, it doesn't work for me.

Reply
 
 
Jan 14, 2020 16:40:16   #
Lt. Rob Polans ret.
 
Owl32 wrote:
? if all these people have such entanglements in the NWO/CFR what are they doing in our Government and Congress? This whole business is Anti-American and contrary to our Constitution. They all need to go and 3/4 of them placed in a hole in the Ground.


This wasn't a one day thing for them to get into the government. Many (like Bushes) are on the fringe. Yes, I'd volunteer to put them in a hole about 6' deep by 3' wide and usually covered!

Reply
Jan 14, 2020 16:52:07   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
Lt. Rob Polans ret. wrote:
I agree with bring the troops home and yes there has been a buildup of them lately. Something I disagree with. The mask is off? Yes, but not in the way that he says. The terrorist was k**led (how does he justify Trump is a g*******t next to that)? Now add to it what I've tried to tell you, no clue if you were listening. So, second in command of terror in the middle east, first in command of terror in the middle east for the deep state. And President Trump's a g*******t? Sorry, it doesn't work for me.
I agree with bring the troops home and yes there h... (show quote)


Who sais Trump is a g*******t?

At least he isn't swamped with CFR g*******ts in his cabinet.

Trump’s Cabinet members:
(CFR/Not CFR)
Main article: Formation of Donald Trump's cabinet
After E******n Day, media outlets reported on persons described by various sources as possible appointments to senior positions in the incoming Trump presidency. The number of people which have received media attention as potential cabinet appointees is higher than in most previous p**********l e******ns, partly because the Trump '16 campaign staff (and associated PACs) was significantly smaller and less expensive,[102] thus there are not as many people already expected to receive specific roles in the upcoming Trump administration. In particular, "Trump ha[d] a smaller policy brain trust [policy group] than a new president normally carries"[103] because as an anti-establishment candidate who began his campaign by largely self-funding his way to the Republican Party nomination,[104] unlike most previous p**********l winners "Trump does not have the traditional cadre of Washington insiders and donors to build out his Cabinet."[105] An additional factor that tends to make the field of potential nominees especially broad, is that unlike most p**********l t***sition teams who select politicians as their appointees, the Trump t***sition team "has started with a mandate to hire from the private sector [as opposed to the governmental sector] whenever possible."
Vice President[
Mike Pence (not CFR)
Cabinet
The following cabinet positions are listed in order of their creation (also used as the basis for the United States p**********l line of succession).
Secretary of State
Rex Tillerson (not CFR)

Mike Pompeo (not CFR)

Secretary of the Treasury
Steve Mnuchin (not CFR)
.
Secretary of Defense
Jim Mattis (not CFR)

Mark Esper (not CFR)

Attorney General
Dana Boente (not CFR)
Sally Yates (not CFR)

Jeff Sessions (not CFR)
Matthew Whitaker (not CFR)
William Barr (not CFR)

Secretary of the Interior]
Ryan Zinket (not CFR)

David Bernhardt (not CFR)

Secretary of Agriculture
Sonny Perdue (not CFR)

Secretary of Commerce
Wilbur Ross (not CFR)

Secretary of Labor
Alex Acosta (not CFR)

Eugene Scalia (not CFR)

Secretary of Health and Human Services
Tom Price (not CFR)

Secretary of Housing and Urban Development
Ben Carson (not CFR)

Secretary of T***sportation
Elaine Chao (CFR/85)
.
Secretary of Energy
Rick Perry (not CFR)

Dan Brouillette (not CFR)
Secretary of Education
Betsy DeVos (not CFR)


Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Robert Wilkie (CFR)
Secretary of Homeland Security[
John F. Kelly (not CFR)
Kirstjen Nielsen (not CFR)
Cabinet-level officials[edit]
Further information: Political appointments of Donald Trump
Cabinet-level officials have positions that are considered to be of Cabinet level, but which are not part of the Cabinet. Which exact positions are considered part of the p**********l cabinet, can vary with the president. The CIA and FEMA were cabinet-level agencies under Bill Clinton, but not George W. Bush. The head of the Office of National Drug Control Policy (aka the drug czar) was a cabinet-level position under both Bill Clinton and George W. Bush, but not under Barack Obama. (Not to be confused with the head of the DEA, who has remained in the org chart underneath the cabinet position held by the Attorney General.) Designation of an agency as being cabinet-level requires[citation needed] that Congress enact legislation, although executive orders unilaterally created by the president can be used to create many other types of position inside the executive branch.[citation needed] Members of the cabinet proper, as well as cabinet-level officials, meet with the president in a room adjacent to the Oval Office.
White House Chief of Staff
.Reince Priebus (not CFR)

Mick Mulvaney (2019) (not CFR)

United States Trade Representative
Robert E. Lighthizer (CFR)


Director of National Intelligence
Dan Coats (not CFR)
ats resigned from his position as Director of National Intelligence. Joseph Maguire took over as acting director.
Ambassador to the United Nations
Nikki Haley (not CFR)

Heather Nauert (not CFR)
On December 7, 2018, Trump nominated Heather Nauert for UN Ambassador.[233] Nauert withdrew her nomination on February 22, 2019.
Kelly Knight Craft (not CFR)

Director of the Office of Management and Budget[edit]
and Budget Committee then presented to the full Senate for a v**e.
Mick Mulvaney (not CFR)

Director of the Central Intelligence Agency[edit]
Mike Pompeo (not CFR)
Gina Haspel (not CFR)
On March 13, 2018, President Donald Trump announced via Twitter that he would nominate Gina Haspel to be the CIA director.[243] On May 17, Haspel was confirmed by the Senate in a 54-45 v**e, officially giving her the post, and making her the first full-time female CIA director.
Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency[edit]
Scott Pruitt (not CFR)
Amid 15 federal investigations of his conduct ranging from criminal record destruction to corrupt allocation of funds and abuse of power, Pruitt announced he would resign from office on July 6, leaving Andrew R. Wheeler as the acting head of the agency
Andrew Wheeler (not CFR)
On November 16, 2018 President Trump nominated Acting Administrator Andrew Wheeler to the position full-time. Wheeler was confirmed by the senate on February 28, 2019, with a 52-47 v**e.
Administrator of the Small Business Administration[
Linda McMahon (not CFR)
Jovita Carranza (not CFR)
On April 4, 2019 President Trump nominated Treasurer of the United States Jovita Carranza to the Small Business Administration, replacing Linda McMahon.[258]

BTW: John R.Bolton (CFR) War Monger. Gone from cabinet for a reason.

CFR Roster Source: http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/cfrall1.htm#d

******************************************************************************


Trump’s Cabinet members:
(CFR/Not CFR)
Main article: Formation of Donald Trump's cabinet
"After E******n Day, media outlets reported on persons described by various sources as possible appointments to senior positions in the incoming Trump presidency. The number of people which have received media attention as potential cabinet appointees is higher than in most previous p**********l e******ns, partly because the Trump '16 campaign staff (and associated PACs) was significantly smaller and less expensive,[102] thus there are not as many people already expected to receive specific roles in the upcoming Trump administration. In particular, "Trump ha[d] a smaller policy brain trust [policy group] than a new president normally carries"[103] because as an anti-establishment candidate who began his campaign by largely self-funding his way to the Republican Party nomination,[104] unlike most previous p**********l winners "Trump does not have the traditional cadre of Washington insiders and donors to build out his Cabinet."[105] An additional factor that tends to make the field of potential nominees especially broad, is that unlike most p**********l t***sition teams who select politicians as their appointees, the Trump t***sition team "has started with a mandate to hire from the private sector [as opposed to the governmental sector] whenever possible.""
Vice President[
Mike Pence (not CFR)
Cabinet
The following cabinet positions are listed in order of their creation (also used as the basis for the United States p**********l line of succession).
Secretary of State
Rex Tillerson (not CFR)

Mike Pompeo (not CFR)

Secretary of the Treasury
Steve Mnuchin (not CFR)
.
Secretary of Defense
Jim Mattis (not CFR)

Mark Esper (not CFR)

Attorney General
Dana Boente (not CFR)
Sally Yates (not CFR)

Jeff Sessions (not CFR)
Matthew Whitaker (not CFR)
William Barr (not CFR)

Secretary of the Interior]
Ryan Zinket (not CFR)

David Bernhardt (not CFR)

Secretary of Agriculture
Sonny Perdue (not CFR)

Secretary of Commerce
Wilbur Ross (not CFR)

Secretary of Labor
Alex Acosta (not CFR)

Eugene Scalia (not CFR)

Secretary of Health and Human Services
Tom Price (not CFR)

Secretary of Housing and Urban Development
Ben Carson (not CFR)

Secretary of T***sportation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Elaine Chao (CFR/85)
.
Secretary of Energy
Rick Perry (not CFR)

Dan Brouillette (not CFR)
Secretary of Education
Betsy DeVos (not CFR)

Secretary of Veterans Affairs
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Robert Wilkie (CFR)
Secretary of Homeland Security[
John F. Kelly (not CFR)

Kirstjen Nielsen (not CFR)
Cabinet-level officials
Further information: Political appointments of Donald Trump
Cabinet-level officials have positions that are considered to be of Cabinet level, but which are not part of the Cabinet. Which exact positions are considered part of the p**********l cabinet, can vary with the president. The CIA and FEMA were cabinet-level agencies under Bill Clinton, but not George W. Bush. The head of the Office of National Drug Control Policy (aka the drug czar) was a cabinet-level position under both Bill Clinton and George W. Bush, but not under Barack Obama. (Not to be confused with the head of the DEA, who has remained in the org chart underneath the cabinet position held by the Attorney General.) Designation of an agency as being cabinet-level requires[citation needed] that Congress enact legislation, although executive orders unilaterally created by the president can be used to create many other types of position inside the executive branch.[citation needed] Members of the cabinet proper, as well as cabinet-level officials, meet with the president in a room adjacent to the Oval Office.
White House Chief of Staff
.Reince Priebus (not CFR)

Mick Mulvaney (2019 (not CFR)

United States Trade Representative
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Robert E. Lighthizer (CFR)


Director of National Intelligence
Dan Coats (not CFR)
ats resigned from his position as Director of National Intelligence. Joseph Maguire took over as acting director.
Ambassador to the United Nations
Nikki Haley (not CFR)

Heather Nauert (not CFR)
On December 7, 2018, Trump nominated Heather Nauert for UN Ambassador.[233] Nauert withdrew her nomination on February 22, 2019.
Kelly Knight Craft (not CFR)

Director of the Office of Management and Budget[edit]
and Budget Committee then presented to the full Senate for a v**e.
Mick Mulvaney (not CFR)

Director of the Central Intelligence Agency[edit]
Mike Pompeo (not CFR)
Gina Haspel (not CFR)
On March 13, 2018, President Donald Trump announced via Twitter that he would nominate Gina Haspel to be the CIA director.[243] On May 17, Haspel was confirmed by the Senate in a 54-45 v**e, officially giving her the post, and making her the first full-time female CIA director.
Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency
Scott Pruitt (not CFR)
Amid 15 federal investigations of his conduct ranging from criminal record destruction to corrupt allocation of funds and abuse of power, Pruitt announced he would resign from office on July 6, leaving Andrew R. Wheeler as the acting head of the agency
Andrew Wheeler (not CFR)
On November 16, 2018 President Trump nominated Acting Administrator Andrew Wheeler to the position full-time. Wheeler was confirmed by the senate on February 28, 2019, with a 52-47 v**e.
Administrator of the Small Business Administration
Linda McMahon (not CFR)
Jovita Carranza (not CFR)
On April 4, 2019 President Trump nominated Treasurer of the United States Jovita Carranza to the Small Business Administration, replacing Linda McMahon
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BTW: John R.Bolton (CFR) War Monger. Gone from cabinet for a reason.

CFR Roster Source: http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/cfrall1.htm#d

Reply
Jan 16, 2020 17:46:43   #
promilitary
 
Seth wrote:
I think the author of the piece is reading too much into events.

Where Iran is concerned (and our relationship with Israel), I believe that Caroline Glick has it spot on:

http://www.jewishworldreview.com/0120/glick011320.php3



I think he's WRITING too much.....have to wonder who takes the time read all of his postings.

Reply
Jan 16, 2020 18:08:01   #
Right leaning Centrist
 
promilitary wrote:
I think he's WRITING too much.....have to wonder who takes the time read all of his postings.


And saying too little.

Reply
 
 
Jan 17, 2020 09:14:39   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
Right leaning Centrist wrote:
And saying too little.


Have you ever taken the time to study the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR)?
Who created it in the 1920's?
Its policies?
Globalism?

Reply
Jan 17, 2020 09:14:55   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
promilitary wrote:
I think he's WRITING too much.....have to wonder who takes the time read all of his postings.


Have you ever taken the time to study the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR)?
Who created it in the 1920's?
Its policies?
Globalism?

Reply
Jan 17, 2020 09:17:16   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
Lonewolf wrote:
The best post I have read in a long time thanks


"The best post I have read in a long time thanks." - Lonrwolf

Thank you.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
Home | Latest Digest | Back to Top | All Sections
Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms of use | DMCA
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.