One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Wild life preserve is supposed to mean just that
Page <<first <prev 4 of 4
Jan 20, 2020 18:19:31   #
JoyV
 
Barracuda2020 wrote:
Clean Water Act. The standards are technology-based (i.e. they are based on the performance of treatment and control technologies); they are not based on risk or impacts upon receiving

Pre Obama is going backward as Obama worked hard to clean up the standards for the environment, especially under the clean water act, which Cheney/ Bush had broken down so that they were allowed to frack by wh**ever means they chose necessary by and with wh**ever toxic chemical they wanted to dispose of.
Clean Water Act. The standards are technology-base... (show quote)


Can you list what sites were cleaned up due to Obama policies? How bout Trump? Just because one spends more money does not mean one has accomplished more.

At the end of fiscal year 2008, there were 1,257 sites on the National Priorities list for cleanup. By the end of fiscal year 2016, that number had increased to 1,337 sites. Here is an MSM article during the first term of the Obama administration. It was neither written to be pro Trump, as this was long before anyone but a clairvoyant could have known Trump would become President. Nor is it a conservative site. http://www.nbcnews.com/id/32351544/ns/us_news-environment/t/obamas-epa-plans-fewer-toxic-cleanups/ While in 2017 under Trump the EPA already was targetting more superfund sites than under Obama. https://www.epa.gov/superfund/superfund-task-force-final-report and one year later, https://www.epa.gov/superfund/superfund-task-force-status-recommendations In his first year 13 superfund sites were cleaned up. How much money is spent is far less important than how it is spent!

Reply
Jan 20, 2020 18:29:04   #
Weewillynobeerspilly Loc: North central Texas
 
Barracuda2020 wrote:
Hey asshole




Could you narrow that down? There are many assholes here......

Reply
Jan 20, 2020 18:37:31   #
JoyV
 
Barracuda2020 wrote:
Little land available for ownership, really, go sell this load somewhere else, as it is foreigners are buying up our farmlands. You're talking about cattlemen who want to use public-state or federal land without cost, to use it freely.

Trump certainly did have to do with stealing away our public landmarks and parks/preservations, go look at the bill. Go look at the Big Ears and Grand Staircase. Also, I'm tired of your accusations without any credible link.

Trump and his inauguration, was completely bogus, and I never said it had anything with the parks, why would I. Stay on track and don't get confused forcing me to straighten you out.
Little land available for ownership, really, go se... (show quote)


I never said cattlemen wanted to graze their cattle for free. They pay for grazing rights! https://land.az.gov/grazing-leases-agreements-and-improvements And how much land is private in your State? In my State of AZ, only 17% of the State is available for private ownership!!!!! https://arizonaland.com/wilderness-ranch-land/sierra-mountain-ranch/only-17-percent-of-land-in-arizona-is-private/

My post was in response to a post with a link which linked Trump's statement regarding the inaugeral crowds to the National Parks Service. It was that article which made the connection, not me.

As for Trump stealing "our" land. By what right should any of "MY" State's 17% of private land or state land become "YOUR" land by government proclamation? Did you pay me or any of us for it? This was eminent domain on a grande scale with NO reimbursement!!! Not even a token reimbursement! Trump did not steal the land. He returned it to the owners!!!! Whether those owners were the residents of a State as a whole, or private owners. He returned stolen goods. Returning stolen goods is not stealing!

Reply
 
 
Jan 22, 2020 08:55:43   #
Cuda2020
 
Weewillynobeerspilly wrote:
Could you narrow that down? There are many assholes here......


This is true, and as they say assholes are like opinions and everyone has one. Humor, das goot.

Reply
Jan 22, 2020 09:05:22   #
Cuda2020
 
JoyV wrote:
I never said cattlemen wanted to graze their cattle for free. They pay for grazing rights! https://land.az.gov/grazing-leases-agreements-and-improvements And how much land is private in your State? In my State of AZ, only 17% of the State is available for private ownership!!!!! https://arizonaland.com/wilderness-ranch-land/sierra-mountain-ranch/only-17-percent-of-land-in-arizona-is-private/

My post was in response to a post with a link which linked Trump's statement regarding the inaugeral crowds to the National Parks Service. It was that article which made the connection, not me.

As for Trump stealing "our" land. By what right should any of "MY" State's 17% of private land or state land become "YOUR" land by government proclamation? Did you pay me or any of us for it? This was eminent domain on a grande scale with NO reimbursement!!! Not even a token reimbursement! Trump did not steal the land. He returned it to the owners!!!! Whether those owners were the residents of a State as a whole, or private owners. He returned stolen goods. Returning stolen goods is not stealing!
I never said cattlemen wanted to graze their cattl... (show quote)


I see, except that wasn't me.

Some ranchers do some don't.

I wouldn't be talking about stealing private land, would I? Though... they can claim it under eminent domain.

You actually believe Trump claimed this to give land back to the owners, really, please validate that, that's not what I've seen.

http://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/11/trump-seize-private-property/602161/

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/trump-justice-department-sues-to-seize-private-property-for-border-wall-construction-2019-12-27

http://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2019/1/18/18176893/eminent-domain-trump-border-wall-gop

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 4
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.