One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
DOJ Quietly Ends Clinton Witch Hunt...Here's What They Found
Jan 10, 2020 13:24:15   #
woodguru
 
So if you want to say this is f**e news from a liberal source, let's hear what the right spin media says
https://www.alternet.org/2020/01/trumps-doj-quietly-ends-two-year-fishing-expedition-on-the-clintons-and-admits-it-found-nothing/?utm_source=&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=3443

Well...they did put the uranium one conspiracy BS to rest, so it wasn't a total waste. Clinton did not have any unilateral veto power or influence over the committee, and the "corrupt" donor had sold his stake in Uranium One long before the deal.

Yet purely ignorant people will continue to use the shorthand term "Uranium One" as everything corrupt about Hillary...because ignorance is king with some people.

Reply
Jan 10, 2020 14:13:38   #
JimMe
 
woodguru wrote:
So if you want to say this is f**e news from a liberal source, let's hear what the right spin media says
https://www.alternet.org/2020/01/trumps-doj-quietly-ends-two-year-fishing-expedition-on-the-clintons-and-admits-it-found-nothing/?utm_source=&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=3443

Well...they did put the uranium one conspiracy BS to rest, so it wasn't a total waste. Clinton did not have any unilateral veto power or influence over the committee, and the "corrupt" donor had sold his stake in Uranium One long before the deal.

Yet purely ignorant people will continue to use the shorthand term "Uranium One" as everything corrupt about Hillary...because ignorance is king with some people.
So if you want to say this is f**e news from a lib... (show quote)




So the Right does make leaps in reporting just like the Left... Sad but True...

Reply
Jan 10, 2020 14:14:09   #
American Vet
 
woodguru wrote:
So if you want to say this is f**e news from a liberal source, let's hear what the right spin media says
https://www.alternet.org/2020/01/trumps-doj-quietly-ends-two-year-fishing-expedition-on-the-clintons-and-admits-it-found-nothing/?utm_source=&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=3443

Well...they did put the uranium one conspiracy BS to rest, so it wasn't a total waste. Clinton did not have any unilateral veto power or influence over the committee, and the "corrupt" donor had sold his stake in Uranium One long before the deal.

Yet purely ignorant people will continue to use the shorthand term "Uranium One" as everything corrupt about Hillary...because ignorance is king with some people.
So if you want to say this is f**e news from a lib... (show quote)


LOL. The Secretary of State did not have any "influence"?? Can you even say that with a straight face?

Reply
 
 
Jan 11, 2020 07:17:55   #
silvereagle
 
I knew all along k**liary could not have done the deed.Our politicians did this and the annointed one signed off on it.Maybe she got a kickback I dont know.

Reply
Jan 11, 2020 07:22:34   #
American Vet
 
silvereagle wrote:
I knew all along k**liary could not have done the deed.Our politicians did this and the annointed one signed off on it.Maybe she got a kickback I dont know.


Bill Clinton "made $500k for a Russian speech"
This is accurate. The source of the claim is the 2015 book "Clinton Cash" by author and political consultant Peter Schweizer. During an April 2015 interview about the book on Fox News Sunday, he said something that caught our eye: "Of the 13 (Bill) Clinton speeches that fetched $500,000 or more, only two occurred during the years his wife was not secretary of state."

We rated that claim True. And in the course of our investigation of Clinton’s federal financial disclosure forms, we found that former President Clinton gave a talk in 2010 to a Russian finance corporation. He was compensated $500,000.

https://www.politifact.com/facebook-fact-checks/statements/2019/oct/28/facebook-posts/fact-checking-hillary-clintons-ties-russia/

Reply
Jan 11, 2020 07:27:00   #
silvereagle
 
American vet.All politicians make speeches for whopping big money.I call it abuse of their power.They have done this for decades.Look at Olebammie a multi multi millionaire.He is still raking in the big bucks.

Reply
Jan 11, 2020 11:24:19   #
laurig
 
How much do you suppose this cost the Clintons??

Reply
 
 
Jan 12, 2020 09:50:49   #
promilitary
 
woodguru wrote:
So if you want to say this is f**e news from a liberal source, let's hear what the right spin media says
https://www.alternet.org/2020/01/trumps-doj-quietly-ends-two-year-fishing-expedition-on-the-clintons-and-admits-it-found-nothing/?utm_source=&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=3443

Well...they did put the uranium one conspiracy BS to rest, so it wasn't a total waste. Clinton did not have any unilateral veto power or influence over the committee, and the "corrupt" donor had sold his stake in Uranium One long before the deal.

Yet purely ignorant people will continue to use the shorthand term "Uranium One" as everything corrupt about Hillary...because ignorance is king with some people.
So if you want to say this is f**e news from a lib... (show quote)



Beginning to have my doubts about Barr. Not only with this but also that nothing seems to be
forthcoming about the Epstein mess and I am afraid it never will. I am suspecting that Barr found
that there were a LOT of very powerful, high placed men involved.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.