Pelosi wants to add another article of impeachment!!!
Jan 4, 2020 21:39:59 #
proud republican
Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
She went to Court of Appeals to ask if she could add another Article of Impeachment without any v**es!!! Really??? Can she do that???
Jan 4, 2020 21:57:26 #
proud republican wrote:
She went to Court of Appeals to ask if she could add another Article of Impeachment without any v**es!!! Really??? Can she do that???
No, I do not think so.
Jan 4, 2020 22:10:04 #
[quote=proud republican]She went to Court of Appeals to ask if she could add another Article of Impeachment without any v**es!!! Really??? Can she do that???[/quote
=============
No wonder she has been holding the F**e Articles of Impeachment. She is thinking of other ways to add. They have been doing the fishing expedition, to make it effective.
She is the number one law breaker that Congress had created.
I think even if president Trump wins in 2020, and if Congress is still under the radical democrats, they'll continue impeaching him.
That is why it is important, we must remove the radical dems from Congress in 2020. Taxpayers are spending so much money for the crimes these democrats are doing.
=============
No wonder she has been holding the F**e Articles of Impeachment. She is thinking of other ways to add. They have been doing the fishing expedition, to make it effective.
She is the number one law breaker that Congress had created.
I think even if president Trump wins in 2020, and if Congress is still under the radical democrats, they'll continue impeaching him.
That is why it is important, we must remove the radical dems from Congress in 2020. Taxpayers are spending so much money for the crimes these democrats are doing.
Jan 4, 2020 22:22:50 #
[quote=Radiance3][quote=proud republican]She went to Court of Appeals to ask if she could add another Article of Impeachment without any v**es!!! Really??? Can she do that???[/quote
=============
No wonder she has been holding the F**e Articles of Impeachment. She is thinking of other ways to add. They have been doing the fishing expedition, to make it effective.
She is the number one law breaker that Congress had created.
I think even if president Trump wins in 2020, and if Congress is still under the radical democrats, they'll continue impeaching him.
That is why it is important, we must remove the radical dems from Congress in 2020. Taxpayers are spending so much money for the crimes these democrats are doing.[/quote]
=============
No wonder she has been holding the F**e Articles of Impeachment. She is thinking of other ways to add. They have been doing the fishing expedition, to make it effective.
She is the number one law breaker that Congress had created.
I think even if president Trump wins in 2020, and if Congress is still under the radical democrats, they'll continue impeaching him.
That is why it is important, we must remove the radical dems from Congress in 2020. Taxpayers are spending so much money for the crimes these democrats are doing.[/quote]
Jan 4, 2020 22:59:31 #
proud republican wrote:
She went to Court of Appeals to ask if she could add another Article of Impeachment without any v**es!!! Really??? Can she do that???
I don't think so....
Jan 4, 2020 23:49:52 #
Coos Bay Tom
Loc: coos bay oregon
proud republican wrote:
She went to Court of Appeals to ask if she could add another Article of Impeachment without any v**es!!! Really??? Can she do that???
I don't think she can
Jan 5, 2020 00:04:27 #
dtucker300
Loc: Vista, CA
Is This why Pelosi is Holding up Impeachment?
Pelosi managed to jam impeachment through the house but seems to have backed off of it now as she is refusing to hand the articles over to the Senate. Pelosi can hold onto them indefinitely according to the law but she is unlikely to do so because of the repercussions she may face e*******lly in 2020. Many are still curious as to why she is doing this, putting aside the legality of it, here are some theories as to why Pelosi may be keeping the Articles of Impeachment close to the chest:
1.) The House Impeachment Managers
Some believe this shocking delay has been caused by Pelosi’s inability to select impeachment managers yet. This role is crucial to impeachment, these managers act as the prosecutors in the case for impeachment, without them there is no impeachment trial.
2.) Timing
One theory than many propose is that Pelosi is waiting to hand the articles over until after the Senate clears other items off of the agenda. A lot of recent legislation is waiting to go through the Senate and Pelosi might want to wait so that Impeachment is the number 1 issue in the Senate.
3.) Control
By keeping the articles of impeachment in the House Pelosi maintains control over the entire process. Considering the position the Democrats are in this may be her best option.
4.) Attacking the President
By keeping the articles Pelosi would make it so the Senate could not exonerate the President, this would make him a guilty man without ever getting a trial. This move has never been seen in politics before and would set a dangerous precedent.
5.) Political Advantage
Pelosi is very afraid that a Senate trial will bolster Republican efforts in 2020 and that the trial will ultimately be key in getting Trump reelected. This would be against her best interest as a democrat, this is in theory of course. No one knows for sure why Pelosi and her team is keeping the articles, but we may find out soon.
Ten senators to watch during the Impeachment:
There are several senators that are going to be very important if and when impeachment moves forward. Remember that Pelosi can hold onto the articles of impeachment indefinitely. If she eventually hands the articles over to the Senate there are 10 Senators that could make moves that would shift the outcome and the optics. Here are the Senators that can change the fate of impeachment and Donald Trump:
1.) Mitch McConnell
Mitch McConnell reigns supreme in the Senate, he could k**l impeachment the second it is handed to him, but that is unlikely. McConnell and Republicans alike only have the political clout to gain if they hold a trial and the Democrats end up with egg on their faces.
2.) Chuck Schumer
Chuck Schumer is in charge of the Democrats on the Senate side of Congress. He could very easily move impeachment or a trial in a direction that supports his point of view. It is important to keep your eyes on the Schumer as impeachment moves forward.
3.) Lamar Alexamder
Lamar Alexander is retiring in 2020 and if the Senate trial is held before he leaves he could v**e in any direction. He has split from the GOP and Trump on other occasions, he could do anything because he doesn’t have an e******n to lose.
4.) Susan Collins
Susan Collins has proven herself to be an unreliable v**e on the big GOP issues. Impeachment is no different, many are unsure as to where she will v**e.
5.) Doug Jones
Doug Jones is in a tight spot, he is facing a very tough ree******n and may swing to supporting Trump in order to win.
6.) Joe Manchin
Joe Manchin should have an obvious spot on this list, anytime actual debate goes on in Congress Manchin is looked at. Manchin is in a tough spot being in a red state while running as a Democrat, this is the primary cause for his constantly changing v**es.
7.) Lisa Murkowski
Lisa Murkowski is a flip flop in the Senate, she has v**ed against the GOP before and impeachment may be no different. It will be important to watch here as impeachment ramps up.
8.) Rand Paul
Rand Paul is likely going to shoot impeachment down but he may delay the whole process. He vowed to shoot down any v**e if the rules were unfair or blocked any witness.
9.) Mitt Romney
RINO Romney may v**e against Trump out of sheer spite. The two have never been close and have battled it out in public statements in the past.
10.) Krysten Sinema
Kyrsten Sinema won a tight e******n in 2018, she was as far left as can be then but now she is a much more moderate voice. She could swing either way in an impeachment fight.
Pelosi managed to jam impeachment through the house but seems to have backed off of it now as she is refusing to hand the articles over to the Senate. Pelosi can hold onto them indefinitely according to the law but she is unlikely to do so because of the repercussions she may face e*******lly in 2020. Many are still curious as to why she is doing this, putting aside the legality of it, here are some theories as to why Pelosi may be keeping the Articles of Impeachment close to the chest:
1.) The House Impeachment Managers
Some believe this shocking delay has been caused by Pelosi’s inability to select impeachment managers yet. This role is crucial to impeachment, these managers act as the prosecutors in the case for impeachment, without them there is no impeachment trial.
2.) Timing
One theory than many propose is that Pelosi is waiting to hand the articles over until after the Senate clears other items off of the agenda. A lot of recent legislation is waiting to go through the Senate and Pelosi might want to wait so that Impeachment is the number 1 issue in the Senate.
3.) Control
By keeping the articles of impeachment in the House Pelosi maintains control over the entire process. Considering the position the Democrats are in this may be her best option.
4.) Attacking the President
By keeping the articles Pelosi would make it so the Senate could not exonerate the President, this would make him a guilty man without ever getting a trial. This move has never been seen in politics before and would set a dangerous precedent.
5.) Political Advantage
Pelosi is very afraid that a Senate trial will bolster Republican efforts in 2020 and that the trial will ultimately be key in getting Trump reelected. This would be against her best interest as a democrat, this is in theory of course. No one knows for sure why Pelosi and her team is keeping the articles, but we may find out soon.
Ten senators to watch during the Impeachment:
There are several senators that are going to be very important if and when impeachment moves forward. Remember that Pelosi can hold onto the articles of impeachment indefinitely. If she eventually hands the articles over to the Senate there are 10 Senators that could make moves that would shift the outcome and the optics. Here are the Senators that can change the fate of impeachment and Donald Trump:
1.) Mitch McConnell
Mitch McConnell reigns supreme in the Senate, he could k**l impeachment the second it is handed to him, but that is unlikely. McConnell and Republicans alike only have the political clout to gain if they hold a trial and the Democrats end up with egg on their faces.
2.) Chuck Schumer
Chuck Schumer is in charge of the Democrats on the Senate side of Congress. He could very easily move impeachment or a trial in a direction that supports his point of view. It is important to keep your eyes on the Schumer as impeachment moves forward.
3.) Lamar Alexamder
Lamar Alexander is retiring in 2020 and if the Senate trial is held before he leaves he could v**e in any direction. He has split from the GOP and Trump on other occasions, he could do anything because he doesn’t have an e******n to lose.
4.) Susan Collins
Susan Collins has proven herself to be an unreliable v**e on the big GOP issues. Impeachment is no different, many are unsure as to where she will v**e.
5.) Doug Jones
Doug Jones is in a tight spot, he is facing a very tough ree******n and may swing to supporting Trump in order to win.
6.) Joe Manchin
Joe Manchin should have an obvious spot on this list, anytime actual debate goes on in Congress Manchin is looked at. Manchin is in a tough spot being in a red state while running as a Democrat, this is the primary cause for his constantly changing v**es.
7.) Lisa Murkowski
Lisa Murkowski is a flip flop in the Senate, she has v**ed against the GOP before and impeachment may be no different. It will be important to watch here as impeachment ramps up.
8.) Rand Paul
Rand Paul is likely going to shoot impeachment down but he may delay the whole process. He vowed to shoot down any v**e if the rules were unfair or blocked any witness.
9.) Mitt Romney
RINO Romney may v**e against Trump out of sheer spite. The two have never been close and have battled it out in public statements in the past.
10.) Krysten Sinema
Kyrsten Sinema won a tight e******n in 2018, she was as far left as can be then but now she is a much more moderate voice. She could swing either way in an impeachment fight.
Jan 5, 2020 00:39:41 #
proud republican wrote:
She went to Court of Appeals to ask if she could add another Article of Impeachment without any v**es!!! Really??? Can she do that???
The whole House would have to v**e on it again...and she would have to include the first two articles in the new v**e. I have my doubts that she would even get a majority v**e a second time. Enough is enough, and even Democrats are getting s**k of this fiasco.
Jan 5, 2020 01:24:23 #
EmilyD wrote:
The whole House would have to v**e on it again...and she would have to include the first two articles in the new v**e. I have my doubts that she would even get a majority v**e a second time. Enough is enough, and even Democrats are getting s**k of this fiasco.
Jan 5, 2020 06:33:31 #
[quote=Radiance3][quote=proud republican]She went to Court of Appeals to ask if she could add another Article of Impeachment without any v**es!!! Really??? Can she do that???[/quote
=============
No wonder she has been holding the F**e Articles of Impeachment. She is thinking of other ways to add. They have been doing the fishing expedition, to make it effective.
She is the number one law breaker that Congress had created.
I think even if president Trump wins in 2020, and if Congress is still under the radical democrats, they'll continue impeaching him.
That is why it is important, we must remove the radical dems from Congress in 2020. Taxpayers are spending so much money for the crimes these democrats are doing.[/quote]
She will continue, she is trying her best not to get caught, along with the other crooked people in congress, Dem's and Rino's both!
=============
No wonder she has been holding the F**e Articles of Impeachment. She is thinking of other ways to add. They have been doing the fishing expedition, to make it effective.
She is the number one law breaker that Congress had created.
I think even if president Trump wins in 2020, and if Congress is still under the radical democrats, they'll continue impeaching him.
That is why it is important, we must remove the radical dems from Congress in 2020. Taxpayers are spending so much money for the crimes these democrats are doing.[/quote]
She will continue, she is trying her best not to get caught, along with the other crooked people in congress, Dem's and Rino's both!
Jan 5, 2020 06:42:10 #
Jan 5, 2020 08:25:29 #
Jan 5, 2020 08:45:46 #
Lonewolf wrote:
More crimes are exposed weekly they need to be addressed
I know, the Democrats are very criminal.
Jan 5, 2020 09:20:01 #
proud republican wrote:
She went to Court of Appeals to ask if she could add another Article of Impeachment without any v**es!!! Really??? Can she do that???
===============
Since 2018, Pelosi has spent all her time impeaching president Trump. They've spent hundreds of millions of our taxes to pay for their illegal acts.
They won't stop until perhaps the president is re-elected, and will continue to impeach him.
The House make up are made of 435 representatives. Right now we have 233 democrats, 197 Republicans, 1 Independent, and 4 vacancies. What are the costs of maintaining them in Congress?
Majority leader and minority leader of the House of Representatives $193,900
Speaker of the House of Representatives $223,500
Members of House of Representative Allowance (MRA) annually.
n 2016, each member’s MRA increased by 1% from the 2015 level, and the MRAs range from $1,207,510 to $1,383,709, with an average of $1,268,520.They could hire staff up to 18. All of them covered by Cadillac Medical care. These are the hidden costs. The 435 representatives are given full Cadillac Medical Care all paid for by the taxpayers. This is a separate budget.
Rough estimate of the 233 democrats in Congress, every year.
For democrats expenditures in Congress every year.
233 annual salary $174,000.00 =$40,542,000
233 for MRA 233 * $1,268,520 =$295,565,160. using the average cost.
1 Nancy's annual salary $233,500.00
These costs are not complete. There are many hidden costs like their Cadillac Medical Care and Vacation and sick leave with pay.
Out of this fund paid for them, all they did was impeaching president Trump.
CSRS or change their coverage to FERS. Members are now covered under one of four different
retirement arrangements: CSRS and Social Security;
The CSRS Offset plan, which includes both CSRS and Social Security, but with
CSRS contributions and benefits reduced by Social Security contributions and benefits;
ERS, (Federal Employees Retirement System), which includes the FERS basic retirement annuity, Social Security, and Thrift Savings Plan (TSP)
Under both CSRS (Civil Service Retirement System) and FERS, Members of Congress are eligible for a pension at the age of 62 if they have completed at least 5 years of service. Members are eligible for a pension at age 50 if
they have completed 20 years of service, or at any age after completing 25 years of service. The amount of the pension depends on length of service (as measured in months) and the average of the highest three years of salary. By law, the starting amount of a Member’s retirement annuity
may not exceed 80% of his or her final salary.
https://www.senate.gov/CRSpubs/ac0d1dd5-7316-4390-87e6-353589586a89.pdf
To minimize tax money funded to these l***hes, we need term limits.
Jan 5, 2020 09:23:27 #
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.