Trump needs approval from Congress for a military strike (Page 2): 9/11 was computed by trumps friends the saudi crown prince the same one who bailed out Trump from bankruptcy twice.

Lonewolf

Radiance3 wrote:

===================== br i My goodness what you a... (show quote)

9/11 was computed by trumps friends the saudi crown prince the same one who bailed out Trump from bankruptcy twice.

Weewillynobeerspilly Loc: North central Texas

Lonewolf wrote:

9/11 was computed by trumps friends the saudi crown prince the same one who bailed out Trump from bankruptcy twice.

WTF is wrong with you?

American Vet

Pennylynn wrote:

Okay, let us stick to law, In 1973, over the obje... (show quote)

Thanks for the info.....

Lonewolf

Weewillynobeerspilly wrote:

WTF is wrong with you?

All true

Cherokee38 Loc: Atlanta

Barracuda2020 wrote:

This post was stated back in June, here we are again, he doesn't obey our own Constitutional laws...again and again and again.

Now we've listened to Trump accuse Obama for years of planning to attack Iran and start a war for his re-e******n, and here he is doing the very thing. Is anyone surprised?

http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2019/06/28/trump-wrong-iran-attack-requires-approval-from-congress-column/1564107001/

READ THE LAW YOU ARE ADDRESSING!!

TrueAmerican

Liberty Tree wrote:

If he did nothing you would compain about that. He will never do anything right in your eyes. You would prefer another Obama/Clinton B******i with more Americans dead.

Weewillynobeerspilly Loc: North central Texas

Lonewolf wrote:

All true

None of that is true......only a fool would believe any of that garbage....oh, never mind....my bad.

Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone

Lonewolf wrote:

9/11 was computed by trumps friends the saudi crown prince the same one who bailed out Trump from bankruptcy twice.

What you are talking about happened in early 1990, Donald Trump had two sales. Not bankruptcy, just a need to unload a stake he had in a hotel and a mothballed yacht. The Prince, Bin Talal, bought both. This was not bailout, there was no financial assistance provided, but rather a straight up purchase .

Ergo, what you claim is a lie. This is what happens when you get all your news from "The Beast", half t***hs but mostly lies twisted to make President Trump look bad. How pedestrian on your part!

F.D.R.

Barracuda2020 wrote:

This post was stated back in June, here we are again, he doesn't obey our own Constitutional laws...again and again and again.

Now we've listened to Trump accuse Obama for years of planning to attack Iran and start a war for his re-e******n, and here he is doing the very thing. Is anyone surprised?

http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2019/06/28/trump-wrong-iran-attack-requires-approval-from-congress-column/1564107001/

OOOPS !

mongo Loc: TEXAS

Barracuda2020 wrote:

This post was stated back in June, here we are again, he doesn't obey our own Constitutional laws...again and again and again.

Now we've listened to Trump accuse Obama for years of planning to attack Iran and start a war for his re-e******n, and here he is doing the very thing. Is anyone surprised?

http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2019/06/28/trump-wrong-iran-attack-requires-approval-from-congress-column/1564107001/

Just FYI, the Marines can be sent in to any threat to Americans
without any congressional approval including acts of war by the President
if he deems it necessary to avoid further conflicts.

SEMPER FI

hdjimv Loc: South Dakota

Weewillynobeerspilly wrote:

None of that is true......only a fool would believe any of that garbage....oh, never mind....my bad.

Radiance3

Lonewolf wrote:

9/11 was computed by trumps friends the saudi crown prince the same one who bailed out Trump from bankruptcy twice.

===================
Another dumb bell populating this OPP. Likewise this country. Your fellow rug heads must not be allowed in this country. They terrorize the world.

Radiance3

Barracuda2020 wrote:

Yes and after that horrendous attack, even Bush new the constitutional laws and abided by them. Once again Trump is not King or an Imperialist, simply a commander in chief and has to adhere to Congress.

=============
Your statements are stupid, not worth of my time. Get lost.

Sonny Magoo Loc: Where pot pie is boiled in a kettle

We don't need no stinking permission from Congress. Can't trust the Squad

Radiance3

Barracuda2020 wrote:

Yes and after that horrendous attack, even Bush new the constitutional laws and abided by them. Once again Trump is not King or an Imperialist, simply a commander in chief and has to adhere to Congress.

===================
Your stupid comment does not exist in any of the constitutional authorities of the Commander-in-Chief of this country.

In light of the text, plan, and history of the Constitution, its interpretation by both past Administrations and the courts, the longstanding practice of the executive branch, and the express affirmation of the President's constitutional authorities by Congress, we think it beyond question that the President has the plenary constitutional power to take such military actions as he deems necessary and appropriate to respond to the terrorist attacks upon the United States on September 11, 2001. Force can be used both to retaliate for those attacks, and to prevent and deter future assaults on the Nation. Military actions need not be limited to those individuals, groups, or states that participated in the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon: the Constitution vests the President with the power to strike terrorist groups or organizations that cannot be demonstrably linked to the September 11 incidents, but that, nonetheless, pose a similar threat to the security of the United States and the lives of its people, whether at home or overseas. (32) In both the War Powers Resolution and the Joint Resolution, Congress has recognized the President's authority to use force in circumstances such as those created by the September 11 incidents. Neither statute, however, can place any limits on the President's determinations as to any terrorist threat, the amount of military force to be used in response, or the method, timing, and nature of the response. These decisions, under our Constitution, are for the President alone to make.

https://fas.org/irp/agency/doj/olc092501.html

The radical dems lead by Obama will try all they can to use this for impeachable offense specially it affected Iran the ally of Obama. These radical people would rather protect Iran, than the United Stated. These radical democrats are t*****rs, with clear display of "treasonous acts"