“why would an innocent man bar witnesses who could exonerate him” from testifying in the Senate’s impeachment trial?
Jan 2, 2020 12:58:41 #
nwtk2007
Loc: Texas
eden wrote:
The question Mark Hamill says we should ask ourselves.
Who's Mark Hamill??????
Jan 2, 2020 13:56:45 #
Jan 2, 2020 14:03:09 #
Jan 2, 2020 14:09:22 #
Jan 2, 2020 14:32:41 #
nwtk2007
Loc: Texas
EmilyD wrote:
Yoda to Hamill?
"Be an i***t....don't"
"Be an i***t....don't"
Or, Stupid, young Skywalker is!
Jan 2, 2020 15:42:30 #
PeterS wrote:
We had 13 witnesses crossover and appear before the house and not a single address or phone number was put out. BTW, isn't that the reason you want to know who the whistleblower so you can demean and denigrate them in any way you can?
If Trump was innocent he would allow people to speak and documents to be read. That he won't tell us all we need to know about his innocence--or lack thereof...
If Trump was innocent he would allow people to speak and documents to be read. That he won't tell us all we need to know about his innocence--or lack thereof...
They can speak if they want to, Trump cannot stop that.
The rest of your crap is not worth responding to, y'all have chased and chastised anyone not in liberal line of insanity....i will not waste my time showing what your side has done the last 3 years, you have lived and condoned it petey......you're just a denier liar.
Jan 2, 2020 15:44:27 #
eden wrote:
What “team” is that?
If I have to explain it ya. ......what did your momma say about stupid questions....go with that.
Jan 2, 2020 15:47:15 #
PeterS wrote:
No, they don't. That's called a red herring and is... (show quote)
Bulls**t!!! You know damn well Biden is dirty, guilty of of what you accuse Trump of.....only difference Trumo did not admit it on national TV petey.........just the typical anti Trump brigade hearing nothing.
Quit lying to yourself, you know damn well if Biden hits that stand its over....he is far too stupid to cover his own ass petey.
Jan 2, 2020 17:31:10 #
PeterS wrote:
You didn't answer the question, why would an innocent man hold back witnesses who could exonerate him? The answer is, he wouldn't, not if he were innocent.
As for your interpretation of an all-powerful president--I think you and he are probably the only ones who hold that opinion--why would the house have the power to impeach if the president was more powerful than they were?
As for your interpretation of an all-powerful president--I think you and he are probably the only ones who hold that opinion--why would the house have the power to impeach if the president was more powerful than they were?
I answered the question. The problem is your lack of scope. You can't understand the answer.
The Constitution defined his status vis a vis the other two branches. It it exactly as I stated.
Jan 2, 2020 17:38:28 #
eden wrote:
Question for you; why do you segue off at a tangent about P**********l powers ( and you are wrong anyway) and not answer the question posed. It is immaterial who posed the question.
Just answer directly the question posed. No stalling. No obfuscation. No what aboutisms.
Just provide an answer ...if you dare.
Just answer directly the question posed. No stalling. No obfuscation. No what aboutisms.
Just provide an answer ...if you dare.
I provided the answer... direct and on point... exactly as defined in the Constitution. (No, I am not wrong.) If you want another answer, how about this, why would you encourage a piss ant that persists in harassing you?
Jan 2, 2020 17:42:51 #
Lonewolf wrote:
No matter what our crimes are it has no bearing on trumps prosecution !
It does if you are attempting to prosecute Trump for your crimes. It certainly looks like that is the Dems program.
Jan 2, 2020 17:43:45 #
Jan 2, 2020 17:49:17 #
JW wrote:
It does if you are attempting to prosecute Trump for your crimes. It certainly looks like that is the Dems program.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.